Whether this is not signal of rampant corruption, despite substantial evidence wrongdoers are set free.


Whether this is not signal of rampant corruption that despite substantial evidence wrongdoers are set scot free.

Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh yogimpsingh@gmail.com

Attachments10:11 PM (4 minutes ago)

to pmosbsupremecourturgent-actionhgovupMgnregacmupcsup
At least be afraid of God ,there is ultimate court which never spares a wrongdoer.
A wrongdoer sets scot free a wrongdoer because he himself frightened that he may be punished for his evil acts but God will deal all the wrongdoers with the same iron hand.
Where is gone three Indira Avases of Sommari Devi , one Indira Avas of Mata Prasad and one Indira Avas of Shivraj Yadav made in finanacial Year 2013-14 according to website of rural development ministry of Government of India.
 With due respect your applicant wants to draw the kind attention of the Hon’ble Sir to the following submissions as follows.
1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that where is gone Sommari Devi three Indira Avases allocated by Government of India in financial year  2013-14
Beneficiary Details of Somari Devi second Indira Avas.pdf
Beneficiary Details of Somari Devi third Indira Avas.pdf
Beneficiary Details of Somari Devi.pdf
2-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that where is gone Mata Prasad one  Indira Avase as two Indira Avases were allocated  to him  by Government of India in financial year  2013-14
Beneficiary Details of Mata Prasad second Indira Avas.pdf
Beneficiary Details of Mata Prasad first Indira Avas.pdf
3-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that where is gone Shivraj  one  Indira Avase as two Indira Avases were allocated  to him  by Government of India in financial year  2013-14
Beneficiary Details of Shivraj second Indira Avas.pdf
Beneficiary Details of Shivraj first Indira Avas.pdf
4-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that today your applicant downloaded the documents from website
http://mirzapur.nic.in which was in word document which PDF form is as
Indira avas 2013-14.pdf
NEEBI GAHARWAR (13-14).pdf
5-It  is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that Sommari has five unique identities   , Shivraj S/O Jagannath has two , Mata Prasad S/O Kashi Ram has two etc . How is it feasible? Here this question arises that which website is more authentic whether website of rural development ministry which a wrongdoer bureaucrat can’t change or http://mirzapur.nic.in  whose attachments and entries can be easily changed. D.M. Mirzapur asked B.D.O. Chhanbey to made available detail information about cheque number fed on the website of rural development ministry but how can he make available if his hand in glove.
 This is humble request of your applicant to you Hon’ble Sir that It can never be justified to overlook  the rights of citizenry by delivering services in arbitrary manner by floating all set up norms. This is sheer mismanagement which is encouraging wrongdoers to reap benefit of loopholes in system and depriving poor citizens from right to justice. Therefore it is need of hour to take concrete steps in order to curb grown anarchy in the system. For this your applicant shall ever pray you Hon’ble Sir.
                           ‘Yours  sincerely
                            Yogi M. P. Singh
Mohalla-Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road District-Mirzapur , Uttar Pradesh ,India .

2 comments on Whether this is not signal of rampant corruption, despite substantial evidence wrongdoers are set free.

  1. It is submitted before the Hon'ble Sir that Sommari has five unique identities , Shivraj S/O Jagannath has two , Mata Prasad S/O Kashi Ram has two etc . How is it feasible? Here this question arises that which website is more authentic whether website of rural development ministry which a wrongdoer bureaucrat can't change or http://mirzapur.nic.in whose attachments and entries can be easily changed. D.M. Mirzapur asked B.D.O. Chhanbey to made available detail information about cheque number fed on the website of rural development ministry but how can he make available if his hand in glove.

  2. If D.M. Mirzapur directed B.D.O. Chhanbey to make available sought information in regard to cheques used in fake entries and B.D.O. Chhanbey didn't make available it implies that some thing wrong was done. The silence of D.M. Mirzapur is also surprising. Why he is shielding the wrongdoers is a serious matter of concern?

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: