Whether this is not procrastination on the part of High court at Allahabad in providing sought information.

Whether CPIO High court at Allahabad not lowered the dignity High court by not providing sought information.

  

Add star  

Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh

<yogimpsingh@gmail.com>

AttachmentSat, Jul 2, 2016 at 3:25 PM
To: “presidentofindia@rb.nic.in” <presidentofindia@rb.nic.in>, pmosb <pmosb@pmo.nic.in>, supremecourt <supremecourt@nic.in>, urgent-action <urgent-action@ohchr.org>, “hgovup@up.nic.in” <hgovup@up.nic.in>, cmup <cmup@up.nic.in>, csup <csup@up.nic.in>
CPIO ,High court of judicature at Allahabad itself affirmed before the commission on 31/05/2016  as fixed date of hearing in open court  that he will provide the sought information to appellant /your applicant within one month. It is unfortunate that High court of judicature at Allahabad didn’t abide its promise made before commission through its central public information officer.
02 July 2016
14:03
With due respect your applicant wants to draw the kind attention of the Hon’ble Sir to the following submissions as follows.
1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that please take a glance of following order passed by Hon’ble chief information commissioner of India as concluded after aforesaid hearing. Hon’ble Sir may be pleased to take a glance attached PDF document in order to take the perusal of signed copy of the order passed by Hon’ble Chief Information Commissioner of India on 31/05/2016 .

                               CETRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
                             2nd Floor, ‘B Wing, August Kranti Bhawan,
                                 Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi -110067
                                         Tel: +91-I 1-26717355
                                                                                   Appeal No. CIC/CC/A/2014/002533
Appellant: Shree Yogi M. P. Singh 
R/o Mohalla- Surekapuram,
          Jabalpur Road,
          Distt. Mirzapur, UP
Respondent: The Central Public Information Officer,
Registrar (A/c and Examination)/ In- Charge, High Court of Judicature at Allahabad,
Allahabad, UP.
Date of Hearing: 31.05 2016
Date of Decision: 31.05. 2016
ORDER
Facts:
1. The Appellant filed RTI Application dated 05.06.2014 seeking notings, action taken on letter No.18 CM/two-4-2014-16-J/201 1 dated 28.04.2014.
2. The CPIO responded on 11.06.2014. The Appellant filed a First Appeal dated 14.06.2014 with the First Appellate Authority (FAA). The FAA responded on 13.07.2014. The appellant filed the Second Appeal dated 17.11.2014 with the Commission.
Hearing:
3. Both the parties participated in the hearing through video conferencing.
4. The appellant referred to his RTI application dated 05.06.20 14 and stated that no information has been provided to him by the respondent.

5. The respondent stated that vide letter dated 11.06.2014 they have informed the appellant to deposit fee of Rs.50/- per item of information in the form of demand draft but the appellant did not deposit the requisite fee.
6. The appellant stated that he had deposited Postal Orders of Rs.500/- along with his RTI application but the respondent did not return the postal orders.
7. The respondent stated that they have returned the postal orders to the appellant.
8. The appellant stated that he has received the postal orders very late, that too after orders of FAA. Therefore, information may be provided to him free of cost.
Observations:
9. The respondent shall provide the information to the appellant free of cost.
Decision:
10. The respondent is directed to provide information to the appellant in context of the RTI application free of cost within 30 days of this order.
The appeal is disposed of. Copy of the decision be given free of cost to the parties.
                                                                                         Radha Krishna Mathur                                       
                                                                                Chief Information Commissioner
                             
              Authenticated true copy
                 (S. C. Sharma)
                      Dy. Registrar
2-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that High court of judicature at Allahabad is a credible institution of Government of India and its former judges Jagmohan Lal Sinha and many others recalled/remembered for their impeccable integrity who never hesitated in sending former prime minister of India behind the bar in order to establish the rule of law and overcome anarchy in the country.   
3-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that whether this is not reflection of insolence of central public information officer, High court of Judicature at Allahabad that by not providing sought information concerned with the action against moral turpitude of a judge of subordinate judiciary ,he breached his own promise and lowered the dignity of both High court of Judicature at Allahabad and central information commission of India. Whether accountable public functionaries don’t reveal the reminiscences by looking into the history of the High court so that subordinates can learn the lesson of honesty from the dignified life of legal luminaries who served the High court of judicature at Allahabad by setting up an excellent precedent.
                          This is humble request of your applicant to you Hon’ble Sir that It can never be justified to overlook  the rights of citizenry by delivering services in arbitrary manner by floating all set up norms. This is sheer mismanagement which is encouraging wrongdoers to reap benefit of loopholes in system and depriving poor citizens from right to justice. Therefore it is need of hour to take concrete steps in order to curb grown anarchy in the system. For this your applicant shall ever pray you Hon’ble Sir.
                           ‘Yours  sincerely
                            Yogi M. P. Singh Mobile number-7379105911
Mohalla-Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road District-Mirzapur , Uttar Pradesh ,India .

Sent from Mail for Windows 10


CPIO High court didn’t comply the order of CIC.pdf
192K View as HTML Scan and download

2 comments on Whether this is not procrastination on the part of High court at Allahabad in providing sought information.

  1. CPIO ,High court of judicature at Allahabad itself affirmed before the commission on 31/05/2016 as fixed date of hearing in open court that he will provide the sought information to appellant /your applicant within one month. It is unfortunate that High court of judicature at Allahabad didn't abide its promise made before commission through its central public information officer.

  2. Only those public authorities provide sought information to information to information seekers who ensures transparency and accountability in the working of its staffs. Every one knows that the deteriorating condition of High court of judicature at Allahabad.

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: