Whether there is honesty in Modi Government being mute spectators of bungling of public fund.

Why gram pradhan , secretary and Rojgar sevak remained absent on 09/07/2015 when they were informed to remain present with documents in order to cooperate enquiry?
Five Indira avases were passed in the name of Sommari Devi by the Government of India but still her Indira avas has reached to lintel level it means still not covered facing rains of the season. Sommari Devi is 80 years old revered lady. Those who are indulged in deep rooted corruption may call her spam never suit them. I am only helping the vulnerable lady. 
6. Request for obtaining information.—(/) A person, who desires to obtain any information under this Act, shall
make a request in writing or through electronic means in English or Hindi or in the official language of the area in
which the application is being made, accompanying such fee as may be prescribed, to—
(a) the Central Public Information Officer or State Public Information Officer, as the case may be, of the
concerned public authority;
(b) the Central Assistant Public Information Officer or State Assistant Public Information Officer, as the case
may be,
specifying the particulars of the information sought by him or her:
Provided that where such request cannot be made in writing, the Central Public Information Officer or State
Public Information Officer, as the case may be, shall render all reasonable assistance to the person making the request
orally to reduce the same in writing.

(2) An applicant making request for information shall not be required to give any reason for requesting the
information or any other personal details except those that may be necessary for contacting him.
 
Hon’ble accountable corrupt public functionaries of Government of India whether the registered post sent by you received by a spam. 
Why CPIO
ministry of Rural development denied to make available sought information under
Right to Information Act 2005 merely on flimsy ground that matter pertains to
I.A.Y. 
Hon’ble Sir according to subsection 3 of section 6 of Right to
Information Act 2005 –
 Where an application is made to a public authority
requesting for an information,— (i) which is held by another public authority;
or (ii) the subject matter of which is more closely connected with the
functions of another public authority, the public authority, to which such
application is made. shall transfer the application or such part of it as may
be appropriate to that other public authority and inform the applicant
immediately about such transfer: Provided that the tiansfer of an application
pursuant to this sub-section shall be made as soon as practicable but in no
case later than five days from the date of receipt of the application. 
Whether I.A.Y. is not integral part of ministry of Rural
development if not why entire I.A.Y. is on the website of ministry of Rural
development , government of India. 
Sommari
was given five houses , Mata Prasad was given two houses and Shivraj was given
two houses. Single picture fed up on multiple Indira Avases. 

[SUSPECTED SPAM] Grievance Disposal

Trash
x

PGPORTAL cpgrams-darpg@nic.in via nic.in 

3:00 PM (1 hour ago)

to me
Dear Sir/Madam,

 Your Grievance with Registration No.DORLD/E/2015/00476   has been disposed.
 Logon to : http://pgportal.gov.in/ for further details.
 Note: This is a system generated mail. Please do not reply to this.

Grievance Status

Print || Logout
Thank You for Your Valuable Feedback
Status as on 13 Jul 2015

Registration Number : DORLD/E/2015/00476
Name Of Complainant : Yogi M P Singh
Date of Receipt : 15 May 2015
Received by : Department of Rural Development
Forwarded to : Rural Housing
Contact Address : Rural Housing Division -Department of Rural Deptt.
Room No. 454, Krishi Bhavan, New Delhi
110114
Contact Number : 23782313
Grievance Description : Whether corruption can be concealed by saying matter is concerned with I.A.Y. And not concerned with the general administration of rural development ministry. Ministry of rural development is showing 19 newly constructed Indira Avases i.e. three in financial year 2012-13 ,13 in 2013-14 and three in 2014-15 but B.D.O. Chhanvey only 14 why? House of Sommari Devi still to be made . Whether the picture feeding of Indira houses on the website of Government of India is made arbitrarily by the staffs of Government. It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that whether there is competition in Government offices to search various tricks in order to siphon the Government fund meant to poor and downtrodden. Hon’ble Sir according to subsection 3 of section 6 of Right to Information Act 2005 – Where an application is made to a public authority requesting for an information,— (i) which is held by another public authority; or (ii) the subject matter of which is more closely connected with the functions of another public authority, the public authority, to which such application is made. shall transfer the application or such part of it as may be appropriate to that other public authority and inform the applicant immediately about such transfer: Provided that the tiansfer of an application pursuant to this sub-section shall be made as soon as practicable but in no case later than five days from the date of receipt of the application.
Current Status : CASE CLOSED
Your Feedback :
Poor
Date of Action : 13 Jul 2015
Details : In view of the clarification given by the concerned Division, the grievance is being treated as closed at this end.

2 comments on Whether there is honesty in Modi Government being mute spectators of bungling of public fund.

  1. Whether corruption can be concealed by saying matter is concerned with I.A.Y. And not concerned with the general administration of rural development ministry. Ministry of rural development is showing 19 newly constructed Indira Avases i.e. three in financial year 2012-13 ,13 in 2013-14 and three in 2014-15 but B.D.O. Chhanvey only 14 why? House of Sommari Devi still to be made . Whether the picture feeding of Indira houses on the website of Government of India is made arbitrarily by the staffs of Government. It is submitted before the Hon'ble Sir that whether there is competition in Government offices to search various tricks in order to siphon the Government fund meant to poor and downtrodden.

  2. There is substantial evidence of siphoning of public fund but it seems that there is caucus among the corrupts from top to bottom resulting in no action against wrongdoers. One condition is no information to accountable public functionaries about the siphoned public fund , second condition is information available but don't want to take action but third condition is worst as the public is crying to take action but accountable public function wants to shut their mouth. Today's India is facing the third condition which signal of sheer anarchy and lawlessness.

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: