Whether status quo is maintained after direction issued by Lucknow bench of High court

 

Grievance Status for
registration number : GOVUP/E/2019/35924

 

Grievance Concerns To

 

Name Of Complainant-Yogi M. P. Singh

 

Date of Receipt-03/11/2019

 

Received By Ministry/Department-Uttar Pradesh

 

Grievance Description

 

Matter
is concerned with the home secretary government of Uttar Pradesh and others.
Herewith detail representation is attached in the PDF form. On behalf of Dinesh
Pratap Singh S/O Angad Prasad Singh Mohalla-Surekapuram Jabalpur Road Lakshmi
Narayan Baikunh Mahadev Mandir District Mirzapur PIN Code 231001

 

Grievance Document

 

Current Status-Grievance received Date of Action-03/11/2019

 

Officer Concerns To Forwarded to-Uttar Pradesh

 

Officer Name-Shri Arun Kumar Dube

 

Officer Designation-Joint Secretary

 

Contact Address-Chief Minister Secretariat U.P.
Secretariat, Lucknow

 

Email Address Contact Number-05222215127

 

 

Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
Whether status quo is maintained in the matter after the direction issued Dated-07/03/2006 by Lucknow bench of High court of Judicature at Allahabad?
1 message
Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>

3 November 2019 at 14:25

To: pmosb <pmosb@pmo.nic.in>, presidentofindia@rb.nic.in, supremecourt <supremecourt@nic.in>, urgent-action <urgent-action@ohchr.org>, cmup <cmup@up.nic.in>, hgovup@up.nic.in, csup@up.nic.in, uphrclko <uphrclko@yahoo.co.in>, lokayukta@hotmail.com, nch-ca@gov.in

श्री मान जी क्या न्याय पालिका की गरिमा नहीं गिर रही है जिस तरह से विद्वान न्यायाधीश ने आदेश दिया   कुंडी खोल कर दरवाजे  को खोल दिया  जाय जिससे की अनुराधा सिंह सक्षम न्यायालय से सिविल उपचार हासिल करे किन्तु यह क्या लखनऊ पुलिस खुद ही सिविल कोर्ट का पॉवर रखती है | किन्तु प्रार्थी को यह नही मालूम की यह पॉवर लखनऊ पुलिस को किसने डेलिगेट किया है या देश के किस कानून के अनुसार लखनऊ पुलिस को सिविल कोर्ट का दर्जा प्राप्त है | श्री मान जी भ्रष्टाचार का इतना बड़ा साम्राज्य है की लखनऊ पुलिस ने प्रार्थी दिनेश प्रताप सिंह के इतनी संगीन धाराए लगाया की और इतना ही नही पत्नी और बेटी को भी नही छोड़ा की वे लोग रातो रात मकान छोड़ दिए इतना अच्छा आदेश तो कोई कोर्ट भी न पास करता फिर क्या था कमरे का ताला तोड़ कर मकान कब्ज़ा हो गया समस्त सामान को लूट लिया गया प्रार्थी तो जेल में बंद था वकील खड़ा ही नही हुआ जमानत कैंसिल हो गयी पूरा परिवार आतंक के साये  में जीने लगा | यहा पर लोकतंत्र है की आराजकता है जहा पुलिस सिर्फ मनमाना करती है और न्यायालय सिर्फ खेद व्यक्त करके प्रिंट और इलेक्ट्रॉनिक मीडिया को मसाला परोस देता है | कार्यवाही तो किसी के विरुद्ध होती नही |
An application under article 32 of the constitution of India as Lucknow police not only took under teeth the direction of Lucknow bench of High court of judicature at Allahabad but also made the mockery of the law of land by acting as civil court in order to provide civil remedy to the multi named lady Anuradha Singh/ Aradhana Singh / Guddi,
To
The Hon’ble chief justice of India /companion judges
Supreme court of India, New Delhi, India
Petitioner-Yogi M. P. Singh.
Mohalla-Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road
District-Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh Pincode-231001
Versus
Respondent-1-Principal Secretary, Home,
Department of Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow.
2-Director General of police,
The government of Uttar Pradesh
Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh.
3-Superintendent of police,
District-Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh
Prayer-Aggrieved Dinesh Pratap Singh S/O Late Angad Pd. Singh Mobile number9838919619 seeks justice from the court as appropriate direction be issued to the aforementioned respondents to be instrumental in vacating the house and lodge F.I.R. against Land Mafias cum grabbers who are carrying out commercial activities in the house of the applicant or take action against the Land Maffia cum cheater Babu Singh S/O R. P. Singh Address-1914-18 Kanpur Road scheme, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh who breached the terms of the agreement made on 12-Jun-1998.

Most revered Sir –Your applicant invites the kind attention of Hon’ble Sir with due respect to the following submissions as follows.
1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that  51A. Fundamental duties It shall be the duty of every citizen of India (a) to abide by the Constitution and respect its ideals and institutions, the National Flag and the National Anthem;(h) to develop the scientific temper, humanism and the spirit of inquiry and reform;
(i) to safeguard public property and to abjure violence;
(j) to strive towards excellence in all spheres of individual and collective activity so that the nation constantly rises to higher levels of endeavour and achievement
.

2-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that Hon’ble Sir may be pleased to take the perusal of the following submissions.

Most respected Superintendent of police, District Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, the applicant aggrieved Dinesh Pratap Singh, wants to draw the kind attention of the revered Sir to the order passed by the Lucknow bench of the High court of Judicature at Allahabad in the Writ Petition Number-135 H/C Year 2006 as follows-
It is simply ordered that the respondent number 4 to7 shall open the lock of the stair case so that Smt Anuradha Singh the petitioner may come out of the house and take the proper and appropriate remedy in the competent court and after that, she may have the liberty to go anywhere. Since it is not a case in the strict sense of illegal detention, therefore, no direction can be issued to the respondent to produce the detenue in the court and allow her to live free at  her home but since she can not take necessary steps for taking the remedy in the competent court, therefore it is simply ordered that  the alleged detenue Smt Anuradha Singh shall be allowed to go out of the house and respondent number 4 to 7 shall open the lock of the door and open the door so that Smt Anuradha Singh may come out and take appropriate remedy. Dated-07/03/2006 Signed by the concerned Honourable Justice of Highcourt of Judicature of Allahabad, bench of Lucknow. It would be better to take perusal by Sir itself.

Respondent-1-State of U.P. through Secretary of home.

2-S.S.P. Lucknow 3-S.H.O. Ashiyana Police station.

Whether competent court means police as defined by the aforementioned respondents?

To open the lock of the door and open the door for seeking appropriate remedy means to open the door for always and hatching a conspiracy against the applicant and his family.
3-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that Consequently, a fabricated First Information Report by colluding with the police was lodged in the police station Ashiyana on 11 July 2009 after 3 years 4 months 4 days of Judgement Dated-07/03/2006 -under sections of I.P.C. as case number-269/2009 Indian Penal Code- sections 448,406,420,467,468,471,394 of India Penal Code.

All these documents were submitted by the police before the Lucknow bench of High court of judicature at Allahabad and the court took the cognizance and passed the order in accordance with the law but later on police found the records forged and aforementioned fabricated charges not only framed on the applicant but on his wife and daughter as well. Thus terrorised entire family so they fled by putting locks in the rooms latter locks were broken and the entire house was grabbed even valuables were looted. Which means Lucknow police had submitted forged records before the High court along with the affidavit.

Thus a competent and appropriate court delivered the Judgement in the matter in compliance of the High court order Dated-07/03/2006.
This is a humble request of your applicant to you Hon’ble Sir that how can it be justified to withhold public services arbitrarily and promote anarchy, lawlessness and chaos in an arbitrary manner by making the mockery of law of land? This is need of the hour to take harsh steps against the wrongdoer in order to win the confidence of citizenry and strengthen the democratic values for healthy and prosperous democracy. For this, your applicant shall ever pray you, Hon’ble Sir.                              Yours sincerely

Date-03-11-2019              Yogi M. P. Singh, Mobile number-7379105911, Mohalla- Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road, District-Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh, Pin code-231001

Booked At
Booked On
Destination Pincode
Tariff
Article Type
Delivery Location
Delivery Confirmed On
Mirzapur RMS POS Counter
06/10/2019 19:34:22
226004
47.20
Speed Post
Rajendranagar SO Lucknow
10/10/2019 17:56:38
Event Details For : EU787012644IN
Current Status : Item Delivery Confirmed
Date
Time
Office
Event
10/10/2019
17:56:38
Lucknow GPO
Item Delivery Confirmed
10/10/2019
12:17:41
Lucknow GPO
Out for Delivery
09/10/2019
09:26:43
Lucknow GPO
Item Received
08/10/2019
03:54:06
Lucknow NSH
Item Dispatched
08/10/2019
00:53:01
Lucknow NSH
Item Bagged
07/10/2019
23:32:58
Lucknow NSH
Item Received
07/10/2019
05:51:53
MA Mirzapur TMO
Item Dispatched
07/10/2019
05:44:19
MA Mirzapur TMO
Received at TMO
07/10/2019
01:03:57
Mirzapur ICH
Item Dispatched
07/10/2019
00:56:13
Mirzapur ICH
Item Bagged
06/10/2019
20:28:06
Mirzapur ICH
Item Received
06/10/2019
20:13:53
Mirzapur RMS POS Counter
Item Dispatched
06/10/2019
20:12:54
Mirzapur RMS POS Counter
Item Bagged
06/10/2019
19:34:22
Mirzapur RMS POS Counter
Item Booked
 
 
Yogi M. P. Singh is the authorized representative of the applicant to pursue the matter before the competent authorities.
 
The matter is urgent so pay due care to the R.T.I. Communique.
An application under subsection 1 of section 6 of the Right to Information Act 2005 seeking information from public information officer of the following public authority.                
To                                   
                                          Public information officer
 
          Name and designation-Jh fo|kdqekj or whoever may be]
 
                               vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh
 
              Department-  x`g foHkkx tulwpuk vf/kdkjh Mobile No-9454413858        District-Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh PIN Code-226004
 
Subject-You are invited to provide the following pointwise information within time as stipulated under subsection 1 of section 7 of Right to Information Act 2005.
 
Most revered Sir –Your applicant invites the kind attention of Hon’ble Sir with due respect to the following submissions as follows.
 
Hon’ble Sir may be pleased to take the perusal of the संदर्भ संख्या: 40015719066963, दिनांक – 06 Oct 2019 तक की स्थिति  आवेदनकर्ता का विवरण : शिकायत संख्या:- 40015719066963 आवेदक का नाम- Dinesh Pratap Singh and
 
जनसुनवाई
समन्वित शिकायत निवारण प्रणाली, उत्तर प्रदेश
 
सन्दर्भ संख्या:-  40015719067227
 
 
लाभार्थी का विवरण
 
नाम
Dinesh Pratap Singh
पिता/पति का नाम
Angad Prasad Singh
मोबइल नंबर(१)
9838919619
 
Aforementioned grievances cum complaints were submitted by the applicant on the august portal Jansunwai of Government of Uttar Pradesh.
The First, second and third, fourth, fifth page of the annexure is the grievances as aforementioned and order passed by the Lucknow bench of the High court of Judicature at Allahabad in the Writ Petition Number 135 HC Year 2006.
CPIO may be directed to provide the following information pointwise as sought.
Most respected Superintendent of police, District Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, the applicant aggrieved Dinesh Pratap Singh, wants to draw the kind attention of the revered Sir to the order passed by the Lucknow bench of the High court of Judicature at Allahabad in the Writ Petition Number135 HC Year 2006 as follows It is simply ordered that the respondent number 4 to7 shall open the lock of the staircase so that Smt Anuradha Singh the petitioner may come out of the house and take the proper and appropriate remedy in the competent court and after that, she may have the liberty to go anywhere. Since it is not a case in the strict sense of illegal detention, therefore, no direction can be issued to the respondent to produce the detenue in the court and allow her to live free at her home but since she can not take necessary steps for taking the remedy in the competent court, therefore it is simply ordered that the alleged detenue Smt Anuradha Singh shall be allowed to go out of the house and respondent number 4 to 7 shall open the lock of the door and open the door so that Smt Anuradha Singh may come out and take appropriate remedy. Dated07032006 Signed by the concerned Honourable Justices of Division bench of Lucknow.
1-Please provide the G.O./Circular/Legislation which empowers the Lucknow police as the competent court having the power to grant the civil remedies or if any constitutional functionary delegated any such power as aforementioned must be revealed to information seeker in detail.
2-Please, provide access to information regarding the reasoned decision taken by the S.S.P. Lucknow in the grievances aforementioned and which detail is available as page 1 and page 2 of the annexure. Right to reason is an indispensable part of the sound administrative system.
 
Applicant wants to draw the kind attention of the respondent number First who is Secretary of home department, civil secretariat, Government of Uttar Pradesh and respondent number second who is senior superintendent of police Lucknow as well as the station house officer police station Ashiyana who is the respondent number 3 in the Writ Petition Number 135 HC Year 2006 filed in the Lucknow bench of the High court of Judicature at Allahabad filed by Anuradha Singh also named Guddi also named Aradhana Singh through her mother Beena Singh wife of Brijraj Singh also Beena Singh wife of Netrpal Singh. Whether in the same matter, to get remedy from various redressal bodies and get public aid by changing the name is not illegal? This lady took the land of LDA by bearing the name of Guddi daughter of Brijraj Singh and in order to seek remedy from High court of Judicature at Allahabad, she took the new name Anuradha Singh and now she has been Aradhna Singh whether it is not a mockery of the law of land? Sir, please take a glance of the affidavit submitted by the sub-inspector Satyesh Prakash Dwivedi in the Writ Petition Number 135 HC Year 2006. This affidavit is on behalf of the respondent number-1, 2 and 3 so it is the responsibility of concerned to maintain the sanctity of the affidavit. Sir order of the High court of judicature was for respondent number 1.2 and 3. Sir how can it be justified that Aradhna changed name of Guddi and Anuradha could manage the support of respondent number 1, 2 and 3 to get illegal possession of the land and house of the applicant by robbing the household articles of the applicant and fabricating the false charges not only on the applicant but also on his wife and daughter? Whether this step of the aforementioned respondents had not undermined the authority of High court of judicature and against the spirit of the affidavit submitted by them through the aforementioned sub-inspector as the spirit of the affidavit was crushed by them? Whether High court of judicature had ordered to slap false and fabricated charges on the applicant and his wife and daughter as a conspiracy to provide illegal possession to Anuradha Singh now Aradhana Singh and loot the valuables of the applicant by breaking the Locks of rooms? Whether it was the motive of the High court in passing the order that police may play the role of a competent court and competent administrative body as ordered in the writ of multi named personality Anuradha Singh to seek a civil remedy before the competent court? Whether the civil remedy is provided by the police in this largest democracy in the world and the police is the competent court?
3-Please provide the detail of the privileges granted to Lucknow police specially Ashiyana police station which not only overlooked the direction of the Lucknow bench of the High court of judicature at Allahabad but also persecuted not only the applicant but also slapped serious charges on the wife and daughter of the information seeker.
4-Please, provide access to information which caused the police to submit forged documents before the Lucknow bench of the High court of Judicature at Allahabad on behalf of respondent number -1,2 and 3 as later all those documents were declare forged when police acted to provide civil remedy as competent court in order to comply the order passed by High court.
5-Please provide the detail of name and designation of the staffs of the Lucknow police who remained instrumental in declaring the impugned land and house of the applicant as the property of Aradhana Singh and robbing the household valuables by breaking the locks of rooms when family fled from the terror of police, third name of the multi named Lady.
 
     Please provide the aforementioned sought information pointwise as sought by the information seeker. For this applicant shall ever pray you, Hon’ble Sir.
Date-06/10/2019                                          Yours sincerely
                                             Dinesh Pratap Singh S/O Mr Angad Prasad Singh
 
C/O Yogi M. P. Singh, Mobile number-7379105911, Mohalla- Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road, Lakshmi Narayan Baikunth Mahadev Mandir District-Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh, Pin code-231001.
 
 
Note-Indian postal orders of Rs.20 as R.T.I. Fee i.e. Rs.10 bearing serial number-51F 033036and second Indian postal order of Rs.10 bearing serial number-51F 033037.
संदर्भ संख्या : 40015719066963 , दिनांक – 03 Nov 2019 तक की स्थिति
आवेदनकर्ता का विवरण :शिकायत संख्या:-40015719066963
आवेदक का नामDinesh Pratap Singh
विषयMost revered Sir Your applicant invites the kind attention of Hon’ble Sir with due respect to the following submissions as follows. 1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that 51A. Fundamental duties It shall be the duty of every citizen of India a to abide by the Constitution and respect its ideals and institutions, the National Flag and the National Anthemh to develop the scientific temper, humanism and the spirit of inquiry and reform i to safeguard public property and to abjure violence j to strive towards excellence in all spheres of individual and collective activity so that the nation constantly rises to higher levels of endeavour and achievement . 2-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that Hon’ble Sir may be pleased to take the perusal of the following submissions. Most respected Superintendent of police, District Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, the applicant aggrieved Dinesh Pratap Singh, wants to draw the kind attention of the revered Sir to the order passed by the Lucknow bench of the High court of Judicature at Allahabad in the Writ Petition Number135 HC Year 2006 as follows It is simply ordered that the respondent number 4 to7 shall open the lock of the stair case so that Smt Anuradha Singh the petitioner may come out of the house and take the proper and appropriate remedy in the competent court and after that, she may have the liberty to go anywhere. Since it is not a case in the strict sense of illegal detention, therefore, no direction can be issued to the respondent to produce the detenue in the court and allow her to live free at her home but since she can not take necessary steps for taking the remedy in the competent court, therefore it is simply ordered that the alleged detenue Smt Anuradha Singh shall be allowed to go out of the house and respondent number 4 to 7 shall open the lock of the door and open the door so that Smt Anuradha Singh may come out and take appropriate remedy. Dated07032006 Signed by the concerned Honourable Justice of Highcourt of Judicature of Allahabad, bench of Lucknow It would be better to take perusal by Sir itself. Respondent1State of U.P. through Secretary of home. 2S.S.P. Lucknow 3S.H.O. Ashiyana Police station. Whether competent court means police as defined by the aforementioned respondents To open the lock of the door and open the door for seeking appropriate remedy means to open the door for always and hatching a conspiracy against the applicant and his family. Consequently, a fabricated First Information Report by colluding with the police was lodged in the police station Ashiyana on 11 July 2009 after 3 years 4 months 4 days of Judgement Dated07032006 under sections of I.P.C. as case number2692009 Indian Penal Code sections 448,406,420,467,468,471,394 of India Penal Code. All these documents were submitted by the police before the Lucknow bench of High court of judicature at Allahabad and the court took the cognizance and passed the order in accordance with the law but later on police found the records forged and aforementioned fabricated charges not only framed on the applicant but on his wife and daughter as well. Thus terrorised entire family so they fled by putting locks in the rooms latter locks were broken and the entire house was grabbed even valuables were looted. Which means Lucknow police had submitted forged records before the High court along with the affidavit. Thus a competent and appropriate court delivered the Jud
विभाग पुलिस शिकायत श्रेणी
नियोजित तारीख31-10-2019
शिकायत की स्थितिस्तर क्षेत्राधिकारी स्तर पद क्षेत्राधिकारी
Reminder- Feedback –
फीडबैक की स्थिति संलग्नक देखें
नोट– अंतिम कॉलम में वर्णित सन्दर्भ की स्थिति कॉलम-5 में अंकित अधिकारी के स्तर पर हुयी कार्यवाही दर्शाता है!
अधीनस्थ द्वारा प्राप्त आख्या :
क्र..
सन्दर्भ का प्रकार
आदेश देने वाले अधिकारी
आदेश/आपत्ति दिनांक
आदेश/आपत्ति
आख्या देने वाले अधिकारी
आख्या दिनांक
आख्या
स्थिति
संलगनक
1
अंतरित
ऑनलाइन सन्दर्भ
01-10-2019
क्षेत्राधिकारीक्षेत्राधिकारी कैंट ,जनपदलखनऊ
22-10-2019
प्रस्तुत प्रकरण की जांच की गयी |जांच आख्या संलग्न है |
निस्तारित
 

 

 

 

Dinesh Pratap Singh-min.pdf
2162K

3 comments on Whether status quo is maintained after direction issued by Lucknow bench of High court

  1. 1-Please provide the G.O./Circular/Legislation which empowers the Lucknow police as the competent court having the power to grant the civil remedies or if any constitutional functionary delegated any such power as aforementioned must be revealed to information seeker in detail.

    2-Please, provide access to information regarding the reasoned decision taken by the S.S.P. Lucknow in the grievances aforementioned and which detail is available as page 1 and page 2 of the annexure. Right to reason is an indispensable part of the sound administrative system.

  2. प्राप्त फीडबैक -दिनांक05-11-2019 को फीडबैक:-श्री मान जी कुंडी खोल कर दरवाजा खोलने का आदेश लखनऊ पीठ माननीय उच्च न्यायालय इलाहाबाद ने इसलिए दिया की अनुराधा सिंह उर्फ आराधना सिंह उर्फ गुड्डी सक्षम न्यायालय के समक्ष वाद प्रस्तुत कर सिविल उपचार हासिल करे | उपरोक्त ने क्या उपचार हासिल किया है | श्री मान जी किस अधिसूचना के माध्यम से लखनऊ पुलिस को सिविल कोर्ट को दर्जा प्राप्त है या किसी सक्षम अधिकरण या न्यायालय ने लखनऊ पुलिस को अपना अधिकार डेलिगेट कर दिया है जिससे की लखनऊ पुलिस ने उपरोक्त महिला को जमीन और मकान का मालिकाना हक प्रदान कर दिया और न सिर्फ प्रार्थी बल्कि औरत बेटी के खिलाफ संगीन धाराओं में मुक़दमा कर दिया और उनके हटते ही मकान का ताला तोड़ कर मकान पर कब्ज़ा कर लिया गया समस्त गृहस्थी और दुसरे कीमती सामानों को लूट लिया गया इस तरह से लखनऊ पुलिस माननीय उच्च न्यायालय के आदेशो का अक्षरशः पालन किया है | श्री मान जी दश भिन्न भिन्न शिकायतों में एक ही रिपोर्ट लगा कर लखनऊ पुलिस अपने दायित्वों से इति श्री कर लेती है या तो पुलिस विभाग को शिकायतों का निवेदन समझ में नही आता या जान बूझ कर समझने का प्रयास नही करते | मामले में सम्बंधित पुलिस कर्मियों के विरुद्ध नियमानुसार कार्यवाही होनी चाहिए और उच्च न्यायालय आदेश की यथा स्थिति बहाल होनी चाहिए | पुलिस का रिपोर्ट सिर्फ भ्रामक है किसी भी तरह से स्वीकार किया जाता तो उच्च न्यायालय के द्वारा पारित आदेश का उल्लंघन होगा |
    फीडबैक की स्थिति -फीडबैक प्राप्त

  3. Whether it is not mockery of the law of land that police of the state capital took under teeth the direction of the Lucknow bench of the High court of judicature at Allahabad? Most surprising is that lower court itself synchronizing its tuning with the corrupt activities of the police.
    श्री मान जी क्या न्याय पालिका की गरिमा नहीं गिर रही है जिस तरह से विद्वान न्यायाधीश ने आदेश दिया कुंडी खोल कर दरवाजे को खोल दिया जाय जिससे की अनुराधा सिंह सक्षम न्यायालय से सिविल उपचार हासिल करे किन्तु यह क्या लखनऊ पुलिस खुद ही सिविल कोर्ट का पॉवर रखती है | किन्तु प्रार्थी को यह नही मालूम की यह पॉवर लखनऊ पुलिस को किसने डेलिगेट किया है या देश के किस कानून के अनुसार लखनऊ पुलिस को सिविल कोर्ट का दर्जा प्राप्त है |

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: