Whether right to seek justice ends if grievance reaches to some other public authority.

logo जनसुनवाई
समन्वित शिकायत निवारण प्रणाली, उत्तर प्रदेश
Complaint No:-40015716002772
   
     
APPLICANT DETAILS :
Name : Yogi M. P. Singh Father Name : Rajendra Pratap Singh   Gender : MALE
Mobile-1 : 7379105911 Mobile-2 : 7379105911 Email :yogimpsingh@gmail.com
Area : Urban State : उत्तर प्रदेश District : मिर्ज़ापुर
Tehsil : सदर Block : —- Gram Panchayat : —-
Thana : कोतवाली कटरा Address : Tahsil-Sadar, District-Mirzapur
GRIEVANCE AREA DETAILS :
Area : Urban State : उत्तर प्रदेश District : लखनऊ
Tehsil : लखनऊ Block : Gram Panchayat : —-
Village : 0 Thana : गोमती नगर
APPLICATION DETAILS :
Application Detail : How the grievance can be considered to be disposed merely on flimsy ground that matter is not concerned from some one department Ipsofacto obvious that there is mockery of Right to Information Act 2005 by the Registrar UPSIC Registrar Uttar Pradesh State Information Commission again made the mockery of Right to Information Act 2005According to Registrar Uttar Pradesh State Information Commission ,on scrutiny of appeal submitted under subsection 3 of section 19 on date 28032016 by your applicant following defect were traced-There is no time span of 30 days between date when first appeal filed and the date when second appeal submitted But the actual fact is that if the date of sending first appeal be considered ,then this time span is 1 month 4 days and if the date of delivery of first appeal be considered ,then this time span is 1 month 3 days Consequently the second appeal submitted by your applicant was returned back by him on this flimsy ground 1-It is submitted before the Honble Sir that generally in the courts time barred appealwrits are not accepted unless the delay is not condoned by the courts This is first time in the history, an accountable officer of quasi judicial court rejected the appeal that it is premature before the commission The role of the commission is to be instrumental to information seeker in seeking information instead of creating a blockade in the path of information seeker 2-It is submitted before the Honble Sir that first page of PDF attachment is the letter of registrar of Uttar Pradesh State Information Commission accepting that my second appeal was submitted before the commission on 28032016 Second and third page of the PDF attachment are showing that my speed registered post was sent on 24022016 and delivered on 25022016 in the office of superintendent of police Fourth and fifth page of this PDF attachment with this representation are showing that appeal under subsection 1 of section 19 of Right to Information Act 2005 is dated 2
Relief Type : Complaint Address To Officer : Department Name : सूचना
Category Name : भ्रष्टाचार / वित्तीय अनियमितता/कार्यों-विभागीय योजनाओं में लापरवाही/जांच Application Old Reference No : 40015716002608
Attachment : Yes

आवेदन
का विवरण
शिकायत संख्या
40015716002772
आवेदक कर्ता का नाम:
Yogi
M. P. Singh
विषय:
How
the grievance can be considered to be disposed merely on flimsy ground that
matter is not concerned from some one department Ipsofacto obvious that there
is mockery of Right to Information Act 2005 by the Registrar UPSIC Registrar
Uttar Pradesh State Information Commission again made the mockery of Right to
Information Act 2005According to Registrar Uttar Pradesh State Information
Commission ,on scrutiny of appeal submitted under subsection 3 of section 19
on date 28032016 by your applicant following defect were traced-There is no
time span of 30 days between date when first appeal filed and the date when
second appeal submitted But the actual fact is that if the date of sending
first appeal be considered ,then this time span is 1 month 4 days and if the
date of delivery of first appeal be considered ,then this time span is 1
month 3 days Consequently the second appeal submitted by your applicant was
returned back by him on this flimsy ground 1-It is submitted before the
Honble Sir that generally in the courts time barred appealwrits are not
accepted unless the delay is not condoned by the courts This is first time in
the history, an accountable officer of quasi judicial court rejected the
appeal that it is premature before the commission The role of the commission
is to be instrumental to information seeker in seeking information instead of
creating a blockade in the path of information seeker 2-It is submitted
before the Honble Sir that first page of PDF attachment is the letter of
registrar of Uttar Pradesh State Information Commission accepting that my
second appeal was submitted before the commission on 28032016 Second and
third page of the PDF attachment are showing that my speed registered post
was sent on 24022016 and delivered on 25022016 in the office of
superintendent of police Fourth and fifth page of this PDF attachment with
this representation are showing that appeal under subsection 1 of section 19
of Right to Information Act 2005 is dated 2
नियत तिथि:
29
– May – 2016
शिकायत की स्थिति:
लम्बित
अग्रसारित विवरण
क्र..
सन्दर्भ
का प्रकार
आदेश
देने वाले अधिकारी
आदेश
दिनांक
अधिकारी
को प्रेषित
आदेश
आख्या
नियत
दिनांक
स्थिति
आख्या
रिपोर्ट
1
अंतरित
ऑनलाइन
सन्दर्भ
14
– May – 2016
प्रमुख सचिव/सचिव सूचना
29
– May – 2016
लंबित
आवेदन का विवरण
शिकायत संख्या
40015716002608
आवेदक कर्ता का नाम:
Yogi M P Singh
विषय:
Registrar Uttar
Pradesh State Information Commission again made the mockery of Right to
Information Act 2005According to Registrar Uttar Pradesh State Information
Commission ,on scrutiny of appeal submitted under subsection 3 of section 19
on date 28032016 by your applicant following defect were traced-There is no
time span of 30 days between date when first appeal filed and the date when
second appeal submitted But the actual fact is that if the date of sending
first appeal be considered ,then this time span is 1 month 4 days and if the
date of delivery of first appeal be considered ,then this time span is 1
month 3 days Consequently the second appeal submitted by your applicant was
returned back by him on this flimsy ground With due respect your applicantpetitioner
wants to draw the kind attention of the Honble Sir to the following
submissions as follows 1-It is submitted before the Honble Sir that generally
in the courts time barred appealwrits are not accepted unless the delay is
not condoned by the courts This is first time in the history, an accountable
officer of quasi judicial court rejected the appeal that it is premature
before the commission The role of the commission is to be instrumental to
information seeker in seeking information instead of creating a blockade in
the path of information seeker 2-It is submitted before the Honble Sir that
first page of PDF attachment is the letter of registrar of Uttar Pradesh
State Information Commission accepting that my second appeal was submitted before
the commission on 28032016 Second and third page of the PDF attachment are
showing that my speed registered post was sent on 24022016 and delivered on
25022016 in the office of superintendent of police Fourth and fifth page of
this PDF attachment with this representation are showing that appeal under
subsection 1 of section 19 of Right to Information Act 2005 is dated 24022016
3-It is submitted before the Honble Sir that now
नियत तिथि:
22 – May – 2016
शिकायत की स्थिति:
निस्तारित
अग्रसारित विवरण
क्र..
सन्दर्भ का प्रकार
आदेश देने वाले अधिकारी
आदेश दिनांक
अधिकारी को प्रेषित
आदेश
आख्या
नियत दिनांक
स्थिति
आख्या रिपोर्ट
1
अंतरित
ऑनलाइन
सन्दर्भ
07
– May – 2016
प्रमुख सचिव/सचिव सूचना
मामला
सूचना विभाग से सम्‍बन्धित नहीं है। प्रकरण प्रशासनिक सुधार विभाग से सम्‍बन्धित प्रतीत होता है।
22
– May – 2016
निस्तारित

2 comments on Whether right to seek justice ends if grievance reaches to some other public authority.

  1. It is submitted before the Honble Sir that generally in the courts time barred appealwrits are not accepted unless the delay is not condoned by the courts This is first time in the history, an accountable officer of quasi judicial court rejected the appeal that it is premature before the commission The role of the commission is to be instrumental to information seeker in seeking information instead of creating a blockade in the path of information seeker

  2. आवेदन का विवरण
    शिकायत संख्या 40015716002772
    आवेदक कर्ता का नाम: Yogi M. P. Singh
    विषय: How the grievance can be considered to be disposed merely on flimsy ground that matter is not concerned from some one department Ipsofacto obvious that there is mockery of Right to Information Act 2005 by the Registrar UPSIC Registrar Uttar Pradesh State Information Commission again made the mockery of Right to Information Act 2005According to Registrar Uttar Pradesh State Information Commission ,on scrutiny of appeal submitted under subsection 3 of section 19 on date 28032016 by your applicant following defect were traced-There is no time span of 30 days between date when first appeal filed and the date when second appeal submitted But the actual fact is that if the date of sending first appeal be considered ,then this time span is 1 month 4 days and if the date of delivery of first appeal be considered ,then this time span is 1 month 3 days Consequently the second appeal submitted by your applicant was returned back by him on this flimsy ground 1-It is submitted before the Honble Sir that generally in the courts time barred appealwrits are not accepted unless the delay is not condoned by the courts This is first time in the history, an accountable officer of quasi judicial court rejected the appeal that it is premature before the commission The role of the commission is to be instrumental to information seeker in seeking information instead of creating a blockade in the path of information seeker 2-It is submitted before the Honble Sir that first page of PDF attachment is the letter of registrar of Uttar Pradesh State Information Commission accepting that my second appeal was submitted before the commission on 28032016 Second and third page of the PDF attachment are showing that my speed registered post was sent on 24022016 and delivered on 25022016 in the office of superintendent of police Fourth and fifth page of this PDF attachment with this representation are showing that appeal under subsection 1 of section 19 of Right to Information Act 2005 is dated 2
    नियत तिथि: 29 – May – 2016
    शिकायत की स्थिति: लम्बित
    अग्रसारित विवरण-
    क्र.स. सन्दर्भ का प्रकार आदेश देने वाले अधिकारी आदेश दिनांक अधिकारी को प्रेषित आदेश आख्या नियत दिनांक स्थिति आख्या रिपोर्ट
    1 अंतरित ऑनलाइन सन्दर्भ 14 – May – 2016 प्रमुख सचिव/सचिव -सूचना — 29 – May – 2016 लंबित

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: