Whether a registrar has moral right to remain at post of Registrar of Uttar Pradesh state information commission

आवेदन
का विवरण
शिकायत संख्या
60000160000397
आवेदक कर्ता का नाम:
Yogi
M P Singh
विषय:
Whether a registrar has moral right to remain
at the post of Registrar of Uttar Pradesh state information commission who
can’t distinguish between R.T.I. Cmmunique submitted under subsection 1 of
section 6 of Right to Information Act 2005 and an appeal submitted under
subsection 3 of section 19 of Right to Information Act 2005 before the
commission. With due respect your applicant wants to draw the kind attention
of the Hon’ble Sir to the following submissions as follows. 1-It is submitted
before the Hon’ble Sir that please take a glance of subsection 1 of section 6
of Right to Information Act 2005. 6 (1)   A person, who desires to
obtain any information under this Act, shall make a request in writing or
through electronic means in English or Hindi or in the official language of
the area in which the application is being made, accompanying such fee as may
be prescribed, to—     (a) the Central Public Information Officer
or State Public Information Officer, as the case may be, of the concerned
public authority;     (b) the Central Assistant Public Information
Officer or State Assistant Public Information Officer, as the case may be,
specifying the particulars of the information sought by him or her: Provided
that where such request cannot be made in writing, the Central Public
Information Officer or State Public Information Officer, as the case may be,
shall render all reasonable assistance to the person making the request
orally to reduce the same in writing. 2-It is submitted before the Hon’ble
Sir that please take a glance of subsection 3 of section 19 of Right to
Information Act 2005. (3) A second appeal against the decision under
sub-section (1) shall lie within ninety days from the date on which the
decision should have been made or was actually received, with the Central
Information Commission or the State Information Commission: 3-It is submitted
before the Hon’ble Sir that whether under subsection 1 of section 6 of
Right to Information Act 2005,information is sought or appeal is made.
According to Registrar,UPSIC appeal is made as ipsofacto obvious
from the aforesaid letter . In the individual view of your applicant ,post
of registrar is an accountable post who must be well acquainted
with the law of land if not feasible at least has knowledge of provisions of
Right to Information Act 2005. 4-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that
according to him your applicant didn’t  submit the first appeal under
subsection 1 of section 19 of Right to Information Act 2005. Hon’ble Sir
first appeal is obligatory but not mandatory requirement for the second
appeal filed under subsection 3 of section 19 but most blunder was committed
by the registrar UPSIC is that he considered R.T.I. Communique
under subsection 1 of section 6 of Right to Information Act 2005 as appeal
submitted under subsection 3 of section 19 of Right to Information Act 2005
deliberately in order to withhold sought information. This is reflexion of
dubious character of registrar ,Uttar Pradesh state information
commission. 5-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that most surprising
fact is that an individual appointed at the post registrar can’t
differentiate between R.T.I. Communique and R.T.I. Appeal . This incompetent
person treated R.T.I. Communique as an appeal while postal order as R.T.I.
Fee was attached with the communication and in Uttar Pradesh ,fee is charged
under subsection 1 of section 6 of Right to Information Act 2005 but not
under section 19(1) and 19(3). Please take a glance of attached documents
with this representation.
नियत तिथि:
04
– Jun – 2016
शिकायत की स्थिति:
निस्तारित
अग्रसारित विवरण
क्र..
सन्दर्भ
का प्रकार
आदेश
देने वाले अधिकारी
आदेश
दिनांक
अधिकारी
को प्रेषित
आदेश
आख्या
दिनांक
आख्या
नियत
दिनांक
स्थिति
आख्या
रिपोर्ट
1
अंतरित
लोक
शिकायत अनुभाग – 2()
05
– May – 2016
निदेशक सूचना
कृ0 न‍ियमानुसार यथोचित कार्यवाही शीघ्र की जाए
तथा कृत
कार्यवाही के बारे में प्रार्थी को भी कृपया समुचित उतर
दे दिया जाये। 
30
– Jul – 2016
सन्दर्भ संख्या 60000160000397, श्रीा योगी एम0पी0 सिंह के संबंध में।
निस्तारित

2 comments on Whether a registrar has moral right to remain at post of Registrar of Uttar Pradesh state information commission

  1. Whether a registrar has moral right to remain at the post of Registrar of Uttar Pradesh state information commission who can't distinguish between R.T.I. Cmmunique submitted under subsection 1 of section 6 of Right to Information Act 2005 and an appeal submitted under subsection 3 of section 19 of Right to Information Act 2005 before the commission.

  2. अंतरित लोक शिकायत अनुभाग – 2() 05 – May – 2016 निदेशक -सूचना कृ0 न‍ियमानुसार यथोचित कार्यवाही शीघ्र की जाए तथा कृत कार्यवाही के बारे में प्रार्थी को भी कृपया समुचित उतर दे दिया जाये। 30 – Jul – 2016 सन्दर्भ संख्या 60000160000397, श्रीा योगी एम0पी0 सिंह के संबंध में। निस्तारित Applicant was informed nothing and most surprising that Registrar UPSIC has no information that complaint submitted against him was redressed in favor of him without informing him and concerned redressed the complaint in favor of him where is justice in democracy? .

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: