Whether a registrar has moral right to remain at the post of Registrar of Uttar Pradesh state information commission

Grievance Status

Print || Logout
Status as on 31 Jan 2016

Registration Number : GOVUP/E/2016/00380
Name Of Complainant : Yogi M P Singh
Date of Receipt : 31 Jan 2016
Received by : Government of Uttar Pradesh
Officer name : Shri Jawahar Lal
Officer Designation : Deputy Secretary
Contact Address : Chief Minister Secretariat
U.P. Secretariat,
Lucknow226001
Contact Number : 05222215137
Grievance Description : Whether a registrar has moral right to remain at the post of Registrar of Uttar Pradesh state information commission who can’t distinguish between R.T.I. Cmmunique submitted under subsection 1 of section 6 of Right to Information Act 2005 and an appeal submitted under subsection 3 of section 19 of Right to Information Act 2005 before the commission. With due respect your applicant wants to draw the kind attention of the Hon’ble Sir to the following submissions as follows. 1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that please take a glance of subsection 1 of section 6 of Right to Information Act 2005. 6 (1)   A person, who desires to obtain any information under this Act, shall make a request in writing or through electronic means in English or Hindi or in the official language of the area in which the application is being made, accompanying such fee as may be prescribed, to—     (a) the Central Public Information Officer or State Public Information Officer, as the case may be, of the concerned public authority;     (b) the Central Assistant Public Information Officer or State Assistant Public Information Officer, as the case may be, specifying the particulars of the information sought by him or her: Provided that where such request cannot be made in writing, the Central Public Information Officer or State Public Information Officer, as the case may be, shall render all reasonable assistance to the person making the request orally to reduce the same in writing. 2-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that please take a glance of subsection 3 of section 19 of Right to Information Act 2005. (3) A second appeal against the decision under sub-section (1) shall lie within ninety days from the date on which the decision should have been made or was actually received, with the Central Information Commission or the State Information Commission: 3-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that whether under subsection 1 of section 6 of Right to Information Act 2005,information is sought or appeal is made. According to Registrar,UPSIC appeal is made as ipsofacto obvious from the aforesaid letter . In the individual view of your applicant ,post of registrar is an accountable post who must be well acquainted with the law of land if not feasible at least has knowledge of provisions of Right to Information Act 2005. 4-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that according to him your applicant didn’t  submit the first appeal under subsection 1 of section 19 of Right to Information Act 2005. Hon’ble Sir first appeal is obligatory but not mandatory requirement for the second appeal filed under subsection 3 of section 19 but most blunder was committed by the registrar UPSIC is that he considered R.T.I. Communique under subsection 1 of section 6 of Right to Information Act 2005 as appeal submitted under subsection 3 of section 19 of Right to Information Act 2005 deliberately in order to withhold sought information. This is reflexion of dubious character of registrar ,Uttar Pradesh state information commission. 5-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that most surprising fact is that an individual appointed at the post registrar can’t differentiate between R.T.I. Communique and R.T.I. Appeal . This incompetent person treated R.T.I. Communique as an appeal while postal order as R.T.I. Fee was attached with the communication and in Uttar Pradesh ,fee is charged under subsection 1 of section 6 of Right to Information Act 2005 but not under section 19(1) and 19(3). Please take a glance of attached documents with this representation.
Current Status : RECEIVED THE GRIEVANCE

2 comments on Whether a registrar has moral right to remain at the post of Registrar of Uttar Pradesh state information commission

  1. Whether a registrar has moral right to remain at the post of Registrar of Uttar Pradesh state information commission who can't distinguish between R.T.I. Cmmunique submitted under subsection 1 of section 6 of Right to Information Act 2005 and an appeal submitted under subsection 3 of section 19 of Right to Information Act 2005 before the commission.

  2. Undoubtedly such people may not appointed at the key post where serious damages to public occur. Think about the incompetence of registrar concerned who could not distinguish R.T.I. Application and R.T.I. Appeal ipso facto obvious from the post and attached documents.

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: