Whether a registrar has moral right to remain at the post of Registrar of UPSIC if he can’t distinguish

Whether a registrar has moral right to remain at the post of Registrar of UPSIC if he can’t distinguish between R.T.I. Application submitted under subsection 1 of section 6 of Right to Information Act 2005 and R.T.I. Appeal submitted under subsection 3 of section 19 of Right to Information Act 2005. 

आवेदन
का
विवरण
शिकायत
संख्या
60000160000397
आवेदक कर्ता का नाम:
Yogi
M P Singh
विषय:
Whether
a registrar has moral right to remain at the post of Registrar of Uttar Pradesh
state information commission who can’t distinguish between R.T.I. Cmmunique
submitted under subsection 1 of section 6 of Right to Information Act 2005 and
an appeal submitted under subsection 3 of section 19 of Right to Information
Act 2005 before the commission. With due respect your applicant wants to draw
the kind attention of the Hon’ble Sir to the following submissions as follows.
1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that please take a glance of
subsection 1 of section 6 of Right to Information Act 2005. 6 (1)   A
person, who desires to obtain any information under this Act, shall make a
request in writing or through electronic means in English or Hindi or in the
official language of the area in which the application is being made,
accompanying such fee as may be prescribed, to—     (a) the Central
Public Information Officer or State Public Information Officer, as the case may
be, of the concerned public authority;     (b) the Central Assistant
Public Information Officer or State Assistant Public Information Officer, as
the case may be, specifying the particulars of the information sought by him or
her: Provided that where such request cannot be made in writing, the Central
Public Information Officer or State Public Information Officer, as the case may
be, shall render all reasonable assistance to the person making the request
orally to reduce the same in writing. 2-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir
that please take a glance of subsection 3 of section 19 of Right to Information
Act 2005. (3) A second appeal against the decision under sub-section (1) shall
lie within ninety days from the date on which the decision should have been
made or was actually received, with the Central Information Commission or the
State Information Commission: 3-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir
that whether under subsection 1 of section 6 of Right to Information Act
2005,information is sought or appeal is made. According
to Registrar,UPSIC appeal is made as ipsofacto obvious from the
aforesaid letter . In the individual view of your applicant ,post
of registrar is an accountable post who must be well acquainted with
the law of land if not feasible at least has knowledge of provisions of Right
to Information Act 2005. 4-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that
according to him your applicant didn’t  submit the first appeal under
subsection 1 of section 19 of Right to Information Act 2005. Hon’ble Sir first
appeal is obligatory but not mandatory requirement for the second appeal filed
under subsection 3 of section 19 but most blunder was committed by
the registrar UPSIC is that he considered R.T.I. Communique
under subsection 1 of section 6 of Right to Information Act 2005 as appeal
submitted under subsection 3 of section 19 of Right to Information Act 2005
deliberately in order to withhold sought information. This is reflexion of
dubious character of registrar ,Uttar Pradesh state information
commission. 5-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that most surprising fact
is that an individual appointed at the post registrar can’t
differentiate between R.T.I. Communique and R.T.I. Appeal . This incompetent
person treated R.T.I. Communique as an appeal while postal order as R.T.I. Fee
was attached with the communication and in Uttar Pradesh ,fee is charged under
subsection 1 of section 6 of Right to Information Act 2005 but not under
section 19(1) and 19(3). Please take a glance of attached documents with this
representation.
नियत तिथि:
प्रक्रिया में है
शिकायत की स्थिति:
लम्बित

3 comments on Whether a registrar has moral right to remain at the post of Registrar of UPSIC if he can’t distinguish

  1. क्या यही ईमानदारी है मोदी गवर्नमेंट में सभी जानते है पारदर्शिता और जिम्मेदारी सुशासन के अंग है लेकिन जब सूचना ही उपलब्ध कराये गे तो सरकार में कौन सी ईमानदारी है | क्या राज्य सरकार का नाम लेकर अपनी जिम्मेदारी से बच सकती है केंद्रसरकार |खासकर यह मामला पूर्णरूपेण केंद्र सरकार से सम्बंधित है |क्या कर रहे है राज्यपाल जिनकी जिम्मेदारी कानून ब्यवस्था की निगरानी करना और क्या सरकार संबिधान के प्रावधानों के अनुसार काम कर रही है |

  2. Where is honesty in this system? Think about the gravity of situation that the individual who can't identify applications and appeals is appointed on an accountable post of uttar pradesh state information Commission. Whether such appointment is not black spot on this democracy.

  3. Here our public functionaries whether it may be state government or central government only play the role of honesty behind the screen but behind the screen indulged in the amassing wealth through illegal sources. Poor and downtrodden section is being looted in this country.

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: