Whether it is not reflection of rampant corruption in system that report of recovery was not complied

आवेदन
का विवरण
शिकायत
संख्या
60000180131864
आवेदक कर्ता का
नाम:
Yogi M P Singh
आवेदक कर्ता का
मोबाइल न०:
7379105911,
विषय:
Grievance Status for registration number :
PMOPG/E/2018/0492787
शिकायत मंरेगा और PD विभाग द्वारा जाच किया जा चूका है जिससे शिकायत मंरेगा और PD से सम्बंधित है क्या इसी तरह से शिकायत का निस्तारण होता है
क्या उपरोक्त टिपण्णी शिकायत के बिन्दुओ से मेल खाती है
श्री मान उपरोक्त अधिकारिओं की आख्या पर कार्यवाही से सम्बंधित जिसको अमल में लाने का काम जिलाधिकारी , मुख्य विकास अधिकारी और
जिला पंचायत राज अधिकारी करते है
किन्तु विभाग में इतना ज्यादा भ्रस्टाचार है की
उपरोक्त जांच पर लीपा पोती कर
दी है
चू की
ये लोग शिर्सस्थ अधिकारी है और
विभाग में पूरी आराजकता है इसलिए इन लोगो के खिलाफ कोई कार्यवाही नही हो
रही उपरोक्त तीनो अधिकारीओ ने देश की कानून व्यवस्था का
बलात्कार कर
डाला है
प्रदेश सरकार इन्ही लोगो के सहारे चलती है
तो इनके खिलाफ कार्यवाही कौन करेगा श्री मान जी क्या खंड विकास अधिकारी इन
लोगो के
खिलाफ कार्य्वाही करेगा मुख्य मंत्री कार्यालय आख मूद कर इनके आधारहीन गैर क़ानूनी बातों को स्वीकार कर लेता है Whether D. M. Mirzapur can tell the mechanism
to cancel the report made under the Panchayat Raj Act. Whether the mechanism
followed by him if not, why not he be subjected to penal proceedings under
the law of land as no one can take the law of land under teeth as done by
him. Grievance Status for registration number: GOVUP/E/2018/05077 Grievance
Concerns To Name Of Complainant Yogi M. P. Singh Date of Receipt 29/05/2018 Received
By Ministry/Department Uttar Pradesh D.P.R.O. Mirzapur submitted forged
documents before the senior rank officers so he must be subjected to scrutiny
under sections 465,466,467,468,469 and 471 of I.P.C. Whether it is not a
mockery of law of land that the enquiry under challenge was made ground to
dispose of the grievance. The bogus enquiry made by the wrongdoers in order
to shield themselves upheld by the D.M. Mirzapur itself which is a mockery of
law of land and creating insecurity in the mind of the citizenry and
credibility of institutions have reached the nadir in the eye of common
citizenry. It is submitted before the Honourable Sir that deputy commissioner
work and employment had also been granted the charge of B.D.O. Chhanbey
arbitrarily carried out enquiry through its subordinates in order to shield
its corrupt coterie. In order to shield its skin this deputy commissioner and
working B.D.O. Chhanbey Sushil Tripathi made the mockery of the panchayat Raj
ACT and ordered enquiry and superseded enquiry made by the joint team of
senior rank officers Deputy Commissioner MGNREGA and 2-Project Director
Mirzapur carried out under panchayat raj act. Please take a glance of
attached documents with this representation.
नियत तिथि:
प्रक्रिया में है
शिकायत की स्थिति:
लम्बित
रिमाइंडर :
फीडबैक :
फीडबैक की स्थिति:
आवेदन
का संलग्नक

Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
PLEASE direct concerned to pursue the law of land instead of making mockery of it.
Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com> 7 September 2018 at 22:46

To: supremecourt <supremecourt@nic.in>

Cc: urgent-action <urgent-action@ohchr.org>, pmosb <pmosb@pmo.nic.in>, presidentofindia@rb.nic.in, Anjali Anand Srivastava <secy-cic@nic.in>
Bcc: cmup <cmup@up.nic.in>, hgovup@up.nic.in, uphrclko <uphrclko@yahoo.co.in>, csup@up.nic.in

To 

                                                     Hon’ble chief justice of India 

                                                      New Delhi, India
Subject- Bogus enquiry made by the wrongdoers in order to shield themselves upheld by the D.M. Mirzapur itself which is a mockery of law of land and creating insecurity in the mind of the citizenry and credibility of institutions have reached the nadir.
With due respect, your applicant wants to draw the kind attention of the Hon’ble Sir to the following submissions as follows.
1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that please take a glance of following enquiry report which was challenged by your applicant-

2-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that on the ground of aforementioned report, recovery order of Rs.1 Lakh 5 thousand approximate and others made to the wrongdoers including panchayat secretary Jitendra Singh who is one of the team members of the aforementioned team has been waved off. Recovery order was proposed by the joint team of two district-level officers 1-Enquiry officer nominated by the D. M. Mirzapur i.e. Deputy Commissioner MGNREGA and 2-Project Director Mirzapur.
3-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that deputy commissioner work and employment had also been granted the charge of B.D.O. Chhanbey arbitrarily carried out enquiry through its subordinates in order to shield its corrupt coterie. In order to shield its skin this deputy commissioner and working B.D.O. Chhanbey made the mockery of the panchayat Raj ACT and ordered enquiry and superseded enquiry made by the senior rank officers Deputy Commissioner MGNREGA and 2-Project Director Mirzapur carried out under panchayat raj act. 
4-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that Hon’ble Sir please take a glance at the following grievance submitted by the applicant on the public grievance portal of government of India.
Grievance Status for registration number : GOVUP/E/2018/05077
Grievance Concerns To
Name Of Complainant-Yogi M. P. Singh
Date of Receipt-29/05/2018
Received By Ministry/Department-Uttar Pradesh
Grievance Description
D.P.R.O. Mirzapur submitted forged documents before the senior rank officers so he must be subjected to scrutiny under sections 465,466,467,468,469 and 471 of I.P.C.
Grievance Document
Current Status-Case closed
Date of Action-31/08/2018
Remarks
&#x0D; &#x0D; ,&#x0D; &#x0D; ,ok&#x0D; ,&#x0D; shikayt krta dwara purv mai shikayt kiya gya tha jiski janch diya gya hai
Reply Document, Officer Concerns To
Officer Name-Shri Kalyan Banerji, Officer Designation-Under Secretary
Contact Address-Chief Minister Secretariat U.P. Secretariat, Lucknow
Email Address, Contact Number-05222215127
5-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that how the principle of natural justice allow a junior officer to order an enquiry against the proposed recovery order made by the senior rank officers and most surprising that genuine enquiry under panchayat raj act was nullified by the team of subordinates of block development officer Chhanbey.
6-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that when your applicant challenged the validity of the aforementioned Bogus report, then how D.M. Mirzapur can take the recourse of the aforementioned report to close the grievance? Whether it is not a reflection of rampant corruption that the act made the mockery of the law of land was made ground to close the case without attending in a genuine way. Please take a glance of attached documents submitted with the grievance in order to seek justice from the chief minister office government of Uttar Pradesh.  
This is a humble request of your applicant to you Hon’ble Sir that how can it be justified to withhold public services arbitrarily and promote anarchy, lawlessness and chaos in an arbitrary manner by making the mockery of law of land? This is need of the hour to take harsh steps against the wrongdoer in order to win the confidence of citizenry and strengthen the democratic values for healthy and prosperous democracy. For this, your applicant shall ever pray you, Hon’ble Sir.                                                          Yours sincerely
Date-07-09-2018              Yogi M. P. Singh, Mobile number-7379105911, Mohalla- Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road, District-Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh, Pin code-231001.

On Fri, 5 May 2017 at 03:13, Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com> wrote:
शिकायत संख्या
15199160160090
आवेदक कर्ता का नाम:
महेश प्रताप सिंह
How much surprising that wrongdoers are being shielded under the nose of accountable public functionaries

​ ?​
Subject-Communication dated-03-05-2017 addressed to your applicant is sheer
 illegal ,unjustified ,unconstitutional ,mockery of law of land and ultravires to
 constitution if accepted will only promote lawlessness and anarchy in the system
and will set up bad precedent for future generation. 
With great respect to revered Sir, your applicant invites the kind attention of the Hon’ble Sir to the following submissions as follows.
1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that D.P.R.O. Mirzapur is itself a wrongdoer and shielding the wrongdoers indulged in siphoning the public fund. Hon’ble Sir please take a glance of first second and third page of attached documents which are reports of joint team of E.Os. nominated by District Magistrate Mirzapur i.e. district level officers Deputy commissioner MGNREGA and Project director. They have evidently recommended Rs. 1  Lakh 1 thousand and 6 hundred 15 .   
2-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that aforementioned recommendation was made on 28-July-2015 .
 3-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that under point 3 in the enquiry report ,it has been mentioned that complaint regarding the plantation and pond couldn’t be looked into because concerned didn’t provide the records so enquiry couldn’t be carried out consequently sector officer be sent by B.D.O. to carry out enquiry on the ground of merit and defect and then higher authorities be informed about the report. 
 4-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that page four is the communication dated-03-05-2017 and page 5 is enquiry report carried out by wrongdoers themselves who are proved guilty in the report of team nominated by District Magistrate Mirzapur as aforementioned. 
 5-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that think about the time gap between 28-July-2015 and 03-05-2017 i.e. time gap of one year nine month and five days. Even layman can know the motive of D.P.R.O. Mirzapur and his working style from existing circumstantial evidences. 
 6-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that your applicant motive was to implement the recommendation of enquiry officer nominated by district magistrate  through enquiry so that public exchequer be benefitted but motive of D.P.R.O. Mirzapur is ipso facto obvious that he wanted to shield his wrongdoer companions and he succeeded to achieve its ulterior motives. 
 7-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that 

119. The Apex Court held that if the basic order stands vitiated, the consequential order automatically falls.” 

In another case of Chunmun Vs. District Magistrate, Sonbhadra and others; 1998 (89) Revenue Digest 771, this Court has clearly held that the cessation of the financial and administrative powers of a Pradhan on the basis of report submitted by an officer/public servant who is not defined as an Enquiry Officer under Rule 2(c) cannot be the basis for exercise of power under Rule 5. 

Reliance has been placed by Sri Hemant Kumar Misra, learned Counsel appearing for the opposite party no. 7 on a Single Judge decision of this Court in the case of Smt. Malti Devi Vs. State of U.P. and others; 2008 (1) CRC 714. This case Smt. Malti Devi (Supra) is of no avail and is of no relevance at all in as much as that in this case the District Magistrate had appointed the District Basic Education Officer to hold a preliminary enquiry and undisputedly, District Basic Education Officer is a District level officer and, therefore, being a district level officer and having been nominated by the District Magistrate for holding the preliminary enquiry fully fall within the meaning of Enquiry Officer as defined under Rule 2(c) of the Enquiry Rules. In the case in hand there was no appointment of the Enquiry Officer by the District Magistrate and two members of the Enquiry Committee appointed by the Chief Development Officer who is not competent to appoint Enquiry Officer under 1997 Enquiry Rules, could not at all act as Enquiry Officer and any report with their participation in the Enquiry could not be taken as an Enquiry Report under Rule 4. Therefore, the case of Smt. Malti Devi (Supra) had no relevance or any bearing at all so far as the present case is concerned. 
Whether staffs of B.D.O. who are itself proved guilty in the enquiry report carried out under Panchayat Raj Act can supersede the enquiry report by misinterpreting earlier report. Whether D.P.R.O. Mirzapur is a layman who is not apprised with the fact that principal of natural justice never allows a wrongdoer to carry out enquiry in order to prove itself innocent. Undoubtedly D.P.R.O. Mirzapur set wrongdoers scot free by making the mockery of law of land. Undoubtedly D.P.R.O. Mirzapur is guilty of misinterpreting the enquiry report through wrongdoer subordinates of B.D.O. Chhanbey. 
This is humble request of your applicant to you Hon’ble Sir that It can never be justified to overlook  the rights of citizenry by delivering services in arbitrary manner by floating all set up norms. This is sheer mismanagement which is encouraging wrongdoers to reap benefit of loopholes in system and depriving poor citizens from right to justice. Therefore it is need of hour to take concrete steps in order to curb grown anarchy in the system. For this your applicant shall ever pray you Hon’ble Sir.
                                          Yours  sincerely
                            Yogi M. P. Singh Mobile number-7379105911
Mohalla-Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road District-Mirzapur , Uttar Pradesh ,India .

On 18 December 2016 at 11:27, Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com> wrote:

An application under article 32 of constitution of India .
18 December 2016
10:18
To
                                       Hon’ble chief justice of India
                                Supreme court , New Delhi ,India
Subject-Order passed by Registrar judicial on 20-11-2015 is ultravires to constitution of India and gross injustice with the thousands of people belonging to poor and downtrodden section.
With due respect your applicant wants to draw the kind attention of the Hon’ble Sir to the following submissions as follows.
1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that it is quite true that enquiry was conducted by district level officers i.e. Joint team of Deputy commissioner MGNREGA and project director and bungling of public fund was proved and recovery more than Lakhs of rupees was recommended by enquiry team but senior rank officers like D. M. Mirzapur ,DPRO and CDO  overlooked the enquiry report which was mockery of law of land and most surprising still government of Uttar Pradesh didn’t recover recommended amount bungled by wrongdoers .
2-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that whatever grounds were supporting the PIL were kept before accountable public functionaries as negative points of PIL CAUSED the great damage to constitutional and civil rights of poor villagers. Whether such cryptic behaviour of staffs of registry of apex court of India is justified. Whether such steps are not promoting anarchy in our society. Please take a glance of attached documents with this representation.
3-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that according to concerned staffs when apex court didn’t entertain the PIL ,then how the action taken and copy of order be provided but the fate of my PIL addressed to chief justice of India has been decided by the staffs of registry of Apex court of India so copy of order passed by registrar judicial be made available to your applicant so that your applicant may challenge the impugned order passed by Registrar judicial. By not providing the order of REGISTRAR JUDICIAL , CPIO Apex court of India not only violated the provisions of Right to Information Act 2005 but also breached the appellate rights of your applicant consequently deprived thousands of poor villagers from right to justice. What reflects the non recovery of siphoned amount from wrongdoers by the Government of Uttar Pradesh? Even common man can understand it that wrongdoers are acting in caucus with each other and their syndicate is influential.
4-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that if the order of recovery recommended against wrongdoers , then it must be pursued accordingly unless otherwise order passed by the competent authority. But here no rule of law and final reply of B.D.O. Chhanbey ,Mirzapur ,Uttar Pradesh is one of the  attached documents  which is so implicit , illegible  and misleading that it  can be seen by those privileged people having special powers of perception specially bestowed by GOD TO public functionaries working  in government of Uttar Pradesh.
5-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that ipso facto obvious that matter is concerned with the rampant corruption in the system quite obvious from the attached documents with this representation but more ridiculous is that registrar judicial don’t think it fit to be considered as public interest litigation.  Undoubtedly to ignore wrongdoers and their wrongdoing is tantamount to promote them and set up bad example/precedents for future generation.
This is humble request of your applicant to you Hon’ble Sir that It can never be justified to overlook  the rights of citizenry by delivering services in arbitrary manner by floating all set up norms. This is sheer mismanagement which is encouraging wrongdoers to reap benefit of loopholes in system and depriving poor citizens from right to justice. Therefore it is need of hour to take concrete steps in order to curb grown anarchy in the system. For this your applicant shall ever pray you Hon’ble Sir.
                                                                 Yours  sincerely
                                                     Yogi M. P. Singh Mobile number-7379105911
Mohalla-Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road District-Mirzapur , Uttar Pradesh ,India


3 attachments
img076.jpg
2108K
img077.jpg
2292K
grievanceDocument.pdf
2646K
0 0 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
3 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh

Whether staffs of B.D.O. who are itself proved guilty in the enquiry report carried out under Panchayat Raj Act can supersede the enquiry report by misinterpreting earlier report. Whether D.P.R.O. Mirzapur is a layman who is not apprised with the fact that principal of natural justice never allows a wrongdoer to carry out enquiry in order to prove itself innocent. Undoubtedly D.P.R.O. Mirzapur set wrongdoers scot free by making the mockery of law of land. Undoubtedly D.P.R.O. Mirzapur is guilty of misinterpreting the enquiry report through wrongdoer subordinates of B.D.O. Chhanbey.

Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M. P. Singh

फीडबैक की स्थिति:
आवेदन का संलग्नक
संलग्नक देखें
अग्रसारित विवरण-
क्र.स. सन्दर्भ का प्रकार आदेश देने वाले अधिकारी आदेश दिनांक अधिकारी को प्रेषित आदेश आख्या दिनांक आख्या स्थिति आख्या रिपोर्ट
1 अंतरित लोक शिकायत अनुभाग – 1(मुख्यमंत्री कार्यालय ) 04 – Jan – 2019 अपर मुख्य सचिव/प्रमुख सचिव/सचिव -पंचायती राज विभाग कृपया शीघ्र नियमानुसार कार्यवाही किये जाने की अपेक्षा की गई है। अधीनस्थ से वापस weather action against district magistrate chief Development Officer district Panchayat Raj officer will be taken by principal secretary or Chief Minister office but it is most unfortunate that file was sent to them who cannot take action against wrongdoers. Here this question arises that how can Narendra Modi may be crowned in 2019 as the parliamentary election is going on.

Preeti Singh
1 year ago

Think about the gravity of corruption that those who falsely claim honesty on the public platform actually have deformed real face quite obvious from the working style.
नियत तिथि: 03 – Feb – 2019 शिकायत की स्थिति: लम्बित
रिमाइंडर : फीडबैक : फीडबैक की स्थिति: आवेदन का संलग्नक
संलग्नक देखें
अग्रसारित विवरण-
क्र.स. सन्दर्भ का प्रकार आदेश देने वाले अधिकारी आदेश दिनांक अधिकारी को प्रेषित आदेश आख्या दिनांक आख्या स्थिति आख्या रिपोर्ट
1 अंतरित लोक शिकायत अनुभाग – 1(मुख्यमंत्री कार्यालय ) 04 – Jan – 2019 अपर मुख्य सचिव/प्रमुख सचिव/सचिव -पंचायती राज विभाग कृपया शीघ्र नियमानुसार कार्यवाही किये जाने की अपेक्षा की गई है। अधीनस्थ से वापस