Whether it is not corruption that concerned responsible public functionaries are overlooking grievances?

Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
FIRST CHECK BATA DEAL-ICICIBROKERAGE(BROKER) IN BSE DEAL SIR I AM ATTACHING DOCUMENTS FOR YOUR HELP YOU READ AND REPLY BACK.icicibank and its subsidiaries comes under rbi regulation act or not?sir I ASKED IAS OFFICER HE CONFIRMED MATTER COMES UNDER YOUR JURISDICTION?Fw: intentionally omitting to produce or deliver up the document or electronic record to any public servant (section 175, IPC )complaint against mrs Chanda kochar deepak Sidana and Ramesh somisetty and Rakesh Seth.sir and madam rbi allow violations of law
1 message
AJAY SINGH <kumarajaysingh@rediffmail.com> 24 August 2018 at 11:29
To: cepcmumbai@rbi.org.in, singh.gulab@nic.in, governor@rbi.org.in, supremecourt@nic.in, JS-DPG@nic.in, ramesh.somisetty@icicibank.com, yogimpsingh@gmail.com, svpatil@rbi.org.in
I ATTACHED DOCUMENTS FOR REFERNCE.

SIR AGAR MATTER AAPKE JURISDICTION MAIN NAHI AATA -MR GULAB SINGH SENDING MATTER WITHOUT
KNOWLEDGE TO YOU.OR YOU MAKING FOOL TO PUBLIC AND ME??

PLEASE IF MATTER NOT COMES UNDER JURISDICTION WRITE TO CVC AND PMO THAT IAS OFFICER IS
NOT KNOWLEDGE OF GOVT AND BANKING RULES.

EITHER HE resigns OR YOU??

READ ATTACHED DOCUMENTS AND REVERT BACK ME.

SIR IN INDIA FOR ALL CEPC RBI LAWS ARE SAME OR DIFFERENT???
(1)SIR YOUR CEPC JAIPUR WAS ALSO SAYING MUJHE KUCH NAHI PATA.I SHOWED HIM PAPER-HE SAID
KYA LIKHA HAIN???SO I OFFERED RDJAIPUR FOR VIDEO RECORDING WITH HIM.

(2)CONSUMER EDUCATION AND PROTECTION CELL IS EDUCATING MODE OR LEARNING MODE???

(3)I FACE the SAME PROBLEM WITH CEPC JAIPUR-HE SAID IN MEETING I DONT KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT
BANKING AND PROCESS.
WHEN CEPC HAD NO INFORMATION ABOUT RBI AND ICICIBANK HOW MATTERS ARE CLOSED TILL
DATE??????????

MR SVPATIL MAKING FOOL IN PGPORTAL TILL DATE.(DEABD/E/2017/33477)
SIR,

(1)IF MATTER NOT COMES UNDER YOUR JURISDICTION HOW RTI PASSED THROUGH YOUR OFFICES TO
ICICI BROKER MR RAKESH .SETH@ICICISECURITIES.COM.
(2)SIR ICICIBANK MANAGEMENT IS APPOINTED BY RBI?? ICICIBANK MANAGEMENT IN ICICI GROUP IS
SAME OR DIFFERENT.
(3)ICICIBANK SERVER IS INTEGRATED -COMMON SERVER AS PER ICICIGROUP.-RKANNANREPLY
ATTACHED.

SIR, I AM ATTACHING SOME DOCUMENTS. YOU REVIEW THEM AND REPLY ME BACK.

REGARDS,
AJAY KUMAR SINGH

Note: Forwarded message attached

— Original Message —

From: “CEPC, Mumbai” cepcmumbai@rbi.org.in
To: “kumarajaysingh@rediffmail.com” kumarajaysingh@rediffmail.com
Subject: FW: intentionally omitting to produce or deliver up the document or electronic
record to any public servant (section 175, IPC )complaint against mrs chanda kochar
deepak sidana and ramesh somi setty and Rakesh Seth.sir and madam rbi allow violations of
law

AjayKumarSingh.
kumarajaysingh@yahoo.com,kumarajaysingh@rediffmail.com
3rd floor,358,Shantinagar,durgapura railway Station,Jaipur,302018
Mob No 9950321327

———- Forwarded message ———-
From: “CEPC, Mumbai” <cepcmumbai@rbi.org.in>
To: “kumarajaysingh@rediffmail.com” <kumarajaysingh@rediffmail.com>
Cc:
Bcc:
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2018 11:44:43 +0000
Subject: FW: intentionally omitting to produce or deliver up the document or electronic record to any public servant (section 175, IPC )compalint against Mrs Chanda Kochar Deepak sidana and ramesh somisetty and rakesh seth.sir and madam rbi allow violations of law

Sir,
With reference to your trailing mail, we would like to inform you that we are unable to decide the jurisdiction under which your complaint falls as there is no mention of Complainee’s name, address and your address. Further, the complaint is not clear. Request you to kindly explain the matter in detail and to provide us with the following details so as to enable us to take further action on the same.

1.  Complaint against – Name & Address

2.  Your address

Yours faithfully,

Consumer Education and Protection Cell (CEPC), TM-16
Reserve Bank of India
Mumbai Regional Office

From: kumarajaysingh@rediffmail.com <kumarajaysingh@rediffmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2018 12:16 PM
To: Sharma, Mala <malasharma@rbi.org.in>; CEPC, Mumbai <cepcmumbai@rbi.org.in>; CEPC, Ahmedabad <cepcahmedabad@rbi.org.in>; CEPC, Bengaluru <cepcbengaluru@rbi.org.in>; js-dpg@ni.cin; singh.gulab@nic.in; Regional Director, Jaipur <rdjaipur@rbi.org.in>; Governor, Reserve Bank Of India <governor@rbi.org.in>; senior.management@icicibank.commcitoffice@gov.in
Subject: intentionally omitting to produce or deliver up the document or electronic record to any public servant (section 175, IPC )compalint against mrs chanda Kochar deepak sidana and ramesh somisetty and Rakesh seth.sir and madam rbi allow violations of laws…

(1)Enactment of IT Act, 2000 and Amendments with reference to digital evidence:
This section deals with the principles governing the admissibility of electronic evidence
within the legal
the framework of the Indian law of evidence. In the year 2000, Parliament enacted the
Information Technology
Act 2000 (IT Act) to allow for the admissibility of digital evidence3
, which amended the Indian Evidence
Act 1872 (IEA), the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and the Banker’s Book Evidence Act
1891. In order to
make the electronic evidence admissible, the definition of ‘evidence’ has been amended to
include
electronic records4
. The term ‘electronic records‟
5
provides for data, record or data generated, image or
sound stored, received or sent in an electronic form or microfilm or computer-generated
microfiche term “Electronic form”
6 means any information generated, sent, received or stored in media, magnetic,
optical, computer memory, microfilm, computer generated micro fiche or similar device;
whereas the term
“Information”
7
includes data, text, images, sound, voice, codes, computer programmes, software and
databases or microfilm, or computer generated microfiche.

1.1.5 Presumptions Regarding Electronic Evidence:
A fact which is relevant and admissible need not be construed as a proven fact. The judge
must appreciate
the fact in order to conclude that it is a proven fact. The exception to this general
the rule is the existence of
certain facts specified in the Evidence Act that can be presumed by the court as
mentioned below:.
2.1.5.1 Gazettes in electronic form:
Under the provisions of Section 8l A of the Evidence Act, the court presumes the
genuineness of electronic
records purporting to be from the Official Gazette or any legally governed electronic
record, provided that
the electronic record is kept substantially in the form required by law and is produced
from proper
custody.11
2.1.5.2 Electronic agreements:
Section 84A12 provides for the presumption that a contract has been concluded where the
parties’ digital
signatures are affixed to an electronic record that purports to be an agreement.
2.1.5.3 Secure electronic records and digital signatures:
Section 85B of the Evidence Act provides that where a security procedure has been applied
to an electronic
record at a specific time, the record is deemed to be a secure electronic record from
such time until the
time of verification. Unless the contrary is proved, the court is to presume that a
secure electronic record
has not been altered since obtaining secure status. The provisions relating to a secure
digital signature is
set out in Section 15 of the IT Act. It is presumed that by affixing a secure digital
signature the subscriber
intends to sign or approve the electronic record. In respect of digital signature
certificates (Section 8 of the
Evidence Act) , it is presumed that the information listed in the certificate is correct,
with the exception of
the information specified as subscriber information that was not verified when the subscriber
accepted the
certificate.

10 Indian Evidence Act, 1872 ( as amended in 2000)
11 Ibid
12 Supra note 12

In State Bank of India v. Rizvi Exports Ltd (DRT, Allahabad)39
, the SBI had filed a case to recover money
from some persons who had taken loans and submitted printouts of the statement of accounts
maintained in
SBI‟s computer systems as a part of the evidence. The relevant certificates as mandated by
the Bankers Books
of Evidence Act, had not been attached to these printouts. The Court held that these
documents were not
admissible as evidence.
Note: Forwarded message attached

— Original Message —

From: “Sharma, Mala” malasharma@rbi.org.in
To: “kumarajaysingh@rediffmail.com” kumarajaysingh@rediffmail.com
Subject: Re: SO NATURAL OF JUSTICE GIVE ME RIGHT THAT RBI CALL A MEETING WITH ICICIBANK
LOCAL EMPLOYEE AT JAIPUR.201819002000677 Fw: Auto-Acknowledgment for disposed, Complaint
NO. is 201819002000677

AjayKumarSingh.
kumarajaysingh@yahoo.com,kumarajaysingh@rediffmail.com
3rd floor,358,Shantinagar,durgapura railway Station,Jaipur,302018
Mob No 9950321327


Caution: The Reserve Bank of India never sends mails, SMSs or makes calls asking for personal information such as your bank account details, passwords, etc. It never keeps or offers funds to anyone. Please do not respond in any manner to such offers, however official or attractive they may look.


Notice: This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, use, review, distribution, printing or copying of the information contained in this e-mail message and/or attachments to it are strictly prohibited. If you have received this email by error, please notify us by return e-mail or telephone and immediately and permanently delete the message and any attachments. The recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The Reserve Bank of India accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email.

———- Forwarded message ———-
From: “Sharma, Mala” <malasharma@rbi.org.in>
To: “kumarajaysingh@rediffmail.com” <kumarajaysingh@rediffmail.com>
Cc:
Bcc:
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 05:14:47 +0000
Subject: Re: SO NATURAL OF JUSTICE GIVE ME RIGHT THAT RBI CALL A MEETING WITH ICICIBANK LOCAL EMPLOYEE AT JAIPUR.201819002000677 Fw: Auto-Acknowledgment for disposed of, Complaint NO. is 201819002000677
? kindly do not send me emails.  I have been transferred from this department.  You can mail to cepc at cepcnewdelhi@rbi.org.in in future.

????, / With Regards
???? ????? / Mala Sharma
????? ??????????? / Asstt General Manager
???????? ?????? ??? ??????? ???? / Consumer Education & Protection Cell
?????? ??????? ????,?? ?????? / RBI, New Delhi
Have a nice day
???? ??? ??? ?? ! *
________________________________
From: kumarajaysingh@rediffmail.com <kumarajaysingh@rediffmail.com> on behalf of AJAY SINGH <kumarajaysingh@rediffmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2018 8:19 AM
To: js-dpg@nic.in; Governor,Reserve Bank Of India; sinha.vijay@nic.in; Banking Ombudsman, Jaipur; jaipur.ito1.3@incometax.gov.insupremcourt@nic.inSINGH.GULAB@NIC.IN; Sharma, Mala
Subject: SO NATURAL OF JUSTICE GIVE ME RIGHT THAT RBI CALL A MEETING WITH ICICIBANK LOCAL EMPLOYEE AT JAIPUR.201819002000677 Fw: Auto-Acknowledgment for disposed, Complaint NO. is 201819002000677

Dear sir,

RBI BO IS POINTING ALSO ON FINANCEMINISTRY EMPLOYEES MR GULAB SINGH.I HAD TELEPHONIC
CONVERSATION WITH MR GULAB SINGH AND HE INFORMAED MATTER COMES UNDER RBI DOMAIN.AND HE
WROTE MAILS TO RBI ALSO FOR CLARIFICATION FOR ICICIBANK INCORPORATION.

AS PER ICICIPRUAMC OFFER DOCUMENT-NO INOCORPORATION AND NAME CHANGE.

RBI DECIDE ALL INFORMATION CORRECT OR ALL INFORMATION PROVIDED BY ICICIBANK IS
FAKE. REGULATOR IS HIDING OR CORRECTING ICICIBANK EMPLOYEE FRAUDS?
We are providing all the information provided by icic bank and rbi. So pmo will as neutral
justify information.

PAGE NO 129 OF ICICIPRUAMC.MADAM AGAR INCORPORATION AGAR HUA HOTA TO ICICIBANK KO HI NAHI
PATA CHAHLA???

(1)NO APPEAL WAS MADE BY ANY BANK AGAINST BO BENGALURU ORDER.
(2)REGARDING BANK INFORMATION NO BO SAID INFORMATION IS WRONG.
(3)we want that rbi call a meeting with ito jaipur,sebi and icicibank employees.

To reopen all pgportal complaints.MADAM RBI AND GOVT WILL BE BIAS OR NEUTRAL WITH BOTH
PARTIES.

RBI IS WORKING AGAINST ITS OWN LAWS.

REGARDS,

AJAY KUMAR SINGH
Note: Forwarded message attached

— Original Message —

From: no-reply@rbi.org.in
To: kumarajaysingh@rediffmail.com
Subject: Auto-Acknowledgment for disposed, Complaint NO. is 201819002000677

AjayKumarSingh.
kumarajaysingh@yahoo.com,kumarajaysingh@rediffmail.com
3rd floor,358,Shantinagar,durgapura railway Station,Jaipur,302018
Mob No 9950321327

________________________________

Caution: The Reserve Bank of India never sends mails, SMSs or makes calls asking for personal information such as your bank account details, passwords, etc. It never keeps or offers funds to anyone. Please do not respond in any manner to such offers, however official or attractive they may look.

Notice: This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, use, review, distribution, printing or copying of the information contained in this e-mail message and/or attachments to it are strictly prohibited. If you have received this email by error, please notify us by return e-mail or telephone and immediately and permanently delete the message and any attachments. The recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The Reserve Bank of India accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email.


6 attachments
CEPCJAIPUR.png
92K
AJAYSINGHS.png
615K
ANNEXURE2.jpg
172K
Chandakocharteam.jpg
334K
noname.eml
8K
ICICI_Pru_IntervalFund-II-Quarterly-Plan_F_OD.pdf
821K
0 0 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
2 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh

I ATTACHED DOCUMENTS FOR REFERNCE.

SIR AGAR MATTER AAPKE JURIDICATION MAIN NAHI AATA -MR GULAB SINGH SENDING MATTER WITHOUT
KNOWLEDGE TO YOU.OR YOU MAKING FOOL TO PUBLIC AND ME??

PLEASE IF MATTER NOT COMES UNDER JURIDICTAION WRITE TO CVC AND PMO THAT IAS OFFICER IS
NOT KNOWLEDGE OF GOVT AND BANKING RULES.

EITHER HE RESIGN OR YOU??

READ ATTACHED DOCUMENTS AND REVERT BACK ME.

Arun Pratap Singh
2 years ago

Undoubtedly we are facing precarious situation and most surprising is that public functionaries after drawing huge salary from public exchequer making efforts to increase the back door income. Think about the public offices where clerk openly asks bribe in order to perform its duty. How the system will be reformed if no incumbent is making efforts to correct the wrong practice rampant in the public offices.