Whether it is not anarchy that speed registered post could not delivered in one month?

Grievance
Status for registration number : DPOST/E/2019/00193
Grievance Concerns To
Name Of Complainant-Yogi M. P. Singh
Date of Receipt-03/01/2019
Received By Ministry/Department-Posts
Grievance Description
Online
tracking of speed post is showing that speed post is out for delivery. When the
speed post is out for delivery then why is not reaching to the aggrieved lady.
Government is providing huge salary for diligent and effective services but
here no one thinks so. Swift and time-bound redressal of grievances are the
excellent characteristics of the good governance. Whether one month is not
sufficient for delivery of speed registered post.
Aggrieved
is Preeti Singh C/O Yogi M. P. Singh Mohalla-Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road,
District-Mirzapur, who are still deprived of her debit card because of
carelessness and anarchy in the working of the staffs of the concerned public
authority.
The
post was to be dispatched on 03/12/2018 quite obvious from the sent SMS but
actually dispatched on 11/12/2018 whether concerned can explain it properly.
Which is quite obvious from the attached documents.
According
to SBI, Debit card dispatched on 03/12/2018 which is quite obvious from the
following SMS received on the registered mobile number-9794103433 of the
aggrieved lady Preeti Singh. Content: Your SBI Debit Card ending with 2918
dispatched on 03/12/2018 thru Speed Post No. EB789561604IN. Please follow
instructions on the welcome letter to generate your PIN.
Aforementioned
messages are automatically generated in the system.
Grievance Document
Current Status
Grievance
received, Date of Action-03/01/2019
Officer Concerns To Forwarded to-Posts, Officer Name-Ms. Pratibha Nath
Officer Designation-DDG PG, Contact Address-Room No. 312, Dak Bhavan,
Parliament Street New Delhi Email
Address-Contact Number-
23096087

0 0 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
4 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh

Online tracking of speed post is showing that speed post is out for delivery. When the speed post is out for delivery then why is not reaching to the aggrieved lady. Government is providing huge salary for diligent and effective services but here no one thinks so. Swift and time-bound redressal of grievances are the excellent characteristics of the good governance. Whether one month is not sufficient for delivery of speed registered post.

Rehan Khan
1 year ago

Online tracking of speed post is showing that speed post is out for delivery. When the speed post is out for delivery then why is not reaching to the aggrieved lady? Undoubtedly question is too much important as this case is mere a model. Once I had gone to post a letter through speed registered post but not single post office in Mirzapur city cooperated me and all suggested to go to Head office Fetaha. Finally I had to go head office Fetaha and stood in a long queue.

Arun Pratap Singh
1 year ago

Here most important fact is that why the postal department did not make available the debit card in one month when the department claims to deliver the speed registered post within one week from the date of dispatch. Now they are saying that it could not be delivered because it had no father’s name but here Preeti Singh is a mature lady and she is guardian of the family so no need to give the father’s name and now it was the duty of the concerned staffs to enquire about the Preeti Singh in the Mohalla-Surekapuram where post man daily comes in order to distribute posts.

Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M. P. Singh

Whether it is not contradictory that superintendent of post at Mirzapur district is claiming that post has been delivered but actually online tracking is showing that post is still not delivered whether it is not anarchy and what is the credibility of Superintendent of post district Mirzapur? Next thing superintendent of post district Mirzapur is claiming that post could not be delivered because name of the father was absent in the address so concerned staff return back the post to the SENDER but I think that there is no need of parents name if the children are mature and here addressee is the headman of the family.