Whether it is not anarchy additional secretary U.P. Board neither provided sought inf nor reason

 

 

 

Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
आज कल एक ट्रेंड बनता जा रहा है की कोई भी लोक प्राधिकारी जनसूचना अधिकार के तहत सूचनाए उपलब्ध ही नही करा रहा है |
1 message
Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com> 21 November 2019 at 20:09
To: rovaranasi@gmail.com, “sec. sic” <sec.sic@up.nic.in>, cmup <cmup@up.nic.in>, csup@up.nic.in, desecedu@gmail.com, hgovup@up.nic.in, pmosb <pmosb@pmo.nic.in>, presidentofindia@rb.nic.in, supremecourt <supremecourt@nic.in>, uphrclko <uphrclko@yahoo.co.in>
सोचिये शिक्षा का व्यवसाय इस देश में खूब फल फूल रहा है ऐसे में जिसके पास शैक्षिक अंकपत्र और दूसरे प्रमाण पत्र संशोधित करने की शक्ति हासिल हो तो उसे कौन नही पूछेगा इसलिए अपर सचिव क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय वाराणसी माध्यमिक शिक्षा परिषद् प्रयाग राज उत्तर प्रदेश कहना ही क्या है वे देश की कानून ब्यवस्था को कूड़े की टोकरी में डालते रहते है | वैसे तो ब्यक्ति विशेष को शक्तिया प्रदान करके सुशासन स्थापित किया जाता है लेकिन इस देश में इसका मतलब कुछ उल्टा ही है |
An appeal under subsection 1 of section 19 of the Right to Information Act 2005 as PIO did not consider it fit to even communicate to the information seeker.
To
                                 First Appellate Authority in the             
                              office of Additional Secretary, Regional Office Varanasi,     
                         Board of High School and Intermediate
                        District-Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh PIN Code-221002
Prayer-Public Information Officer not only violated subsection 1 of section 7 of the Right to Information Act 2005 but acted against the spirit of the august act by adopting a reluctant approach to the R.T.I. Communique dated 02/10/2019 which was received in the office of PIO on 09/10/2019 quite obvious from online tracking of the speed post which is given below for perusal of Hon’ble Sir.
Most revered Sir –Your applicant invites the kind attention of Hon’ble Sir with due respect to the following submissions as follows.
1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that following is the online tracking of the speed registered post through which aforementioned R.T.I. Communique was sent.
Booked At
Booked On
Destination Pincode
Tariff
Article Type
Delivery Location
Delivery Confirmed On
Mirzapur HO
03/10/2019 11:22:42
221002
41.30
Speed Post
Varanasi Cantt HO
09/10/2019 17:08:31
Event Details For EU004388400IN
Current Status: Item Delivery Confirmed
Date
Time
Office
Event
09/10/2019
17:08:31
Varanasi Cantt HO
Item Delivery Confirmed
09/10/2019
10:57:56
Varanasi Cantt HO
Out for Delivery
09/10/2019
09:04:21
Varanasi Cantt HO
Item Received
05/10/2019
14:59:00
Varanasi NSH
Item Dispatched
05/10/2019
14:38:24
Varanasi NSH
Item Bagged
05/10/2019
08:50:13
Varanasi NSH
Item Received
04/10/2019
16:16:24
Allahabad NSH
Item Dispatched
04/10/2019
13:46:45
Allahabad NSH
Item Received
03/10/2019
17:39:13
Mirzapur HO
Item Dispatched
03/10/2019
17:13:34
Mirzapur HO
Item Bagged
03/10/2019
11:22:42
Mirzapur HO
Item Booked
2-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that through aforementioned R.T.I. Application dated- 02/10/2019 received in the office of public authority on 09/10/2019, the following information was sought.
Hon’ble Sir may be pleased to take the perusal of the communication dated-17-Sept-2019 sent by Assistant Secretary (certificate) in the office of aforementioned public authority addressed to information seeker attached with this R.T.I. communiqué as page 4.
The First, second and third page of the annexure is the communications of the Principal, Ram Pratap Yadav Intermediate College addressed to the additional secretary, DIOS Mirzapur addressed to the additional secretary, additional secretary to Yogi M. P. Singh in order to clarify the matter.
CPIO may be directed to provide the following information pointwise as sought.
1-Please provide access to information regarding the communication of the Principal, Ram Pratap Yadav Intermediate College addressed to additional secretary dated-13/08/2015.
A-Please, provide the copy of Notings  made on the aforementioned communication by the accountable staffs of the public authority.
B-Please, provide the name and designation of the staffs who paid the role in order to process the aforementioned communication.
2-Please, provide access to information regarding the undue delay made in the processing of the application described under point 1.  
3-Please provide the detail of the staffs who processed the communication of DIOS Mirzapur addressed to the additional secretary attached with the R.T.I. Communique as page second.
4-Please provide the detail of action taken in reference of forgery as described in the communication dated-17-Sept-2019 sent by Assistant Secretary (certificate) in the office of aforementioned public authority addressed to information seeker attached with this R.T.I. communiqué as page 4. Whether F.I.R. has been lodged by the concerned in the matter as concerned with the future of student and dereliction of the public staffs.
5-Please provide the detail of name and designation of the staffs who lodged the F.I.R. and remained instrumental in lodging the F.I.R. in the case of forgery in the matter concerned and made available the copy of the F.I.R to the information seeker.
For more detail, vide attached R.T.I. Communique in the P.D.F. form.
 3-It is to be submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that in subsection 2 of section 7 of the Right to Information Act 2005 stated as follows-
  (2) If the Central Public Information Officer or State Public Information Officer, as the case may be, fails to give decision on the request for information within the period specified under sub-section (1), the Central Public Information Officer or State Public Information Officer, as the case may be, shall be deemed to have refused the request. 
 4-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that THE RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT, 2005 No. 22 of 2005
[15th June, 2005.] An Act to provide for setting out the practical regime of right to information for citizens to secure access to information under the control of public authorities, in order to promote transparency and accountability in the working of every public authority. Whether cryptic denial of the sought information by taking provisions of transparency act under teeth would be plausible by misinterpreting the provisions of the Right to Information Act 2005? Undoubtedly act of CPIO is ultra vires to august act i.e, Right to Information Act 2005 and reflection of the sheer insolence.
5-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that since the working of public authority is not transparent and accountable and corruption is rampant in its office so they are not providing sought information. According to subsection 1 d section 4 of the Right to Information Act 2005, it shall be the obligatory duty of every public authority to provide the reasons for its decisions to the parties concerned but here PIO is only seated/ procrastinating on the R.T.I. Application nothing else.
                              This is a humble request of the applicant to you Hon’ble Sir that how can it be justified to withhold public services arbitrarily and promote anarchy, lawlessness, and chaos in an arbitrary manner by making the mockery of law of land? This is the need of the hour to take harsh steps against the wrongdoer in order to win the confidence of citizenry and strengthen the democratic values for healthy and prosperous democracy. For this, your applicant shall ever pray you, Hon’ble Sir.                                                         
 Please provide the aforementioned sought information pointwise as sought by the information seeker. For this applicant shall ever pray you, Hon’ble Sir.
Date-21/11/2019                                            Yours sincerely
                                          Pradip Kumar Maurya S/O Mr Shiv Shankar Maurya
C/O Yogi M. P. Singh, Mobile number-7379105911, Mohalla- Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road, Lakshmi Narayan Baikunth Mahadev Mandir District-Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh, Pin code-231001.

 

2 attachments
R.T.I. Communique of Pradip Kumar Maurya.docx
599K
R.T.I. Communique of Pradip Kumar Maurya.pdf
440K

3 comments on Whether it is not anarchy additional secretary U.P. Board neither provided sought inf nor reason

  1. सोचिये शिक्षा का व्यवसाय इस देश में खूब फल फूल रहा है ऐसे में जिसके पास शैक्षिक अंकपत्र और दूसरे प्रमाण पत्र संशोधित करने की शक्ति हासिल हो तो उसे कौन नही पूछेगा इसलिए अपर सचिव क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय वाराणसी माध्यमिक शिक्षा परिषद् प्रयाग राज उत्तर प्रदेश कहना ही क्या है वे देश की कानून ब्यवस्था को कूड़े की टोकरी में डालते रहते है | वैसे तो ब्यक्ति विशेष को शक्तिया प्रदान करके सुशासन स्थापित किया जाता है लेकिन इस देश में इसका मतलब कुछ उल्टा ही है |

  2. During the first election Modi sought 60 months rule and promised to provide regime of constitution and regard of provisions of constitution but where is respect of law of land?
    According to subsection 1 d section 4 of the Right to
    Information Act 2005, it shall be the obligatory duty of every public authority to provide the reasons for its decisions to the parties concerned but here PIO is only seated/ procrastinating on the R.T.I. Application nothing else.

  3. Undoubtedly it is an anarchy imposed by our corrupt political masters by colluding with corrupt executives, bureaucrats and judicial members. Our democracy has been incredible because of rampant corruption in the government machinery.Concerned matter is concerned with deep rooted corruption as well as they are procrastinating on the matter since 2015 even when error was made by staffs of the government itself.

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: