Whether it is justified to deprive S.C. and S.T. students of right to scholarship by using various cheating tricks?

आवेदन का विवरण

शिकायत संख्या
40019919010119
आवेदक कर्ता का नाम:
chhotu
आवेदक कर्ता का मोबाइल न०:
7237849131,7237849131
विषय:
Grievance Status for registration number : PMOPG/E/2019/0075595 Grievance Concerns To Name Of Complainant -Yogi M P Singh Date of Receipt -07/02/2019 Received By Ministry/Department -Prime Ministers Office Grievance Description An application under article 51 A of the constitution of India. Whether it is justified to deprive a student of his scholarship arbitrarily on the ground that is because of improvement result declared by the MGKVP University Varanasi and concerned staff made the scrutiny on the ground of result of improvement while the application for the scholarship was submitted much earlier than the improvement result on the basis of the annual result B.Sc. second year. Since the student was fairly passed in the B.Sc. second year and he was awarded the scholarship in the B.Sc. first year and B.Sc. second year. The matter is concerned with a scheduled caste student whose detail is as follows. Name of the student –Chhotu, Registration number-690030221802374, Name of the father-Panchdev, Caste-Scheduled caste, Subcaste-Chamar, B.Sc. part 3 Maths group studying in the K.B.P.G. College Mirzapur. The reason for the scrutiny result to be suspect-obtain/total marks not matched with the university uploaded data. Most revered Sir –Whether the obtained result will not change after the declaration of the improvement result quite obvious from the attached Marksheet of B.Sc. second year after improvement exam conducted by MGKVP University Varanasi. Before the improvement result aforementioned aggrieved student had acquired 292 out of 600 marks but after the improvement exam, it has been 335 out of 600. Moreover, data were subject to scrutiny by the college administration through the original records made available by the students according to guideline which was found accurate so it was forwarded to the concerned department. Here this question arises that whether 292 marks out 600 of the student will not entitle him for the scholarship if entitle him for scholarship, then concerned staff cannot take recourse of the latter marks obtained after the improvement exam result declared as that total mark was not available to him when he was submitting online application for the scholarship. Thus the approach of the staff of the government of Uttar Pradesh is sheer unconstitutional, arbitrary, draconian and corrupt in nature which must be curbed by the accountable public functionaries if they are law abiding. Grievance Document Current Status -Under process Date of Action -12/02/2019 Remarks -Send Through Web Service Officer Concerns To Officer Name -Shri Kalyan Banerji Officer Designation -Under Secretary Contact Address -Chief Minister Secretariat U.P. Secretariat, Lucknow Email Address Contact Number -05222215127
नियत तिथि:
07 – Mar – 2019
शिकायत की स्थिति:
लम्बित
रिमाइंडर :

फीडबैक :

फीडबैक की स्थिति:

आवेदन का संलग्नक
अग्रसारित विवरण-
क्र.स.
सन्दर्भ का प्रकार
आदेश देने वाले अधिकारी
आदेश दिनांक
अधिकारी को प्रेषित
आदेश
आख्या दिनांक
आख्या
स्थिति
आख्या रिपोर्ट
1
अंतरित
ऑनलाइन सन्दर्भ
20 – Feb – 2019
जिला समाज कल्याण अधिकारी-मिर्ज़ापुर,समाज कल्‍याण विभाग

अनमार्क

Pasted from

Grievance Status for registration number : PMOPG/E/2019/0075595
Grievance Concerns To Name Of Complainant -Yogi M P Singh
Date of Receipt -07/02/2019
Received By Ministry/Department -Prime Ministers Office
Grievance Description
An application under article 51 A of the constitution of India. Whether it is justified to deprive a student of his scholarship arbitrarily on the ground that is because of improvement result declared by the MGKVP University Varanasi and concerned staff made the scrutiny on the ground of result of improvement while the application for the scholarship was submitted much earlier than the improvement result on the basis of the annual result B.Sc. second year. Since the student was fairly passed in the B.Sc. second year and he was awarded the scholarship in the B.Sc. first year and B.Sc. second year. The matter is concerned with a scheduled caste student whose detail is as follows. Name of the student –Chhotu, Registration number-690030221802374, Name of the father-Panchdev, Caste-Scheduled caste, Subcaste-Chamar, B.Sc. part 3 Maths group studying in the K.B.P.G. College Mirzapur. The reason for the scrutiny result to be suspect-obtain/total marks not matched with the university uploaded data. Most revered Sir –Whether the obtained result will not change after the declaration of the improvement result quite obvious from the attached Marksheet of B.Sc. second year after improvement exam conducted by MGKVP University Varanasi. Before the improvement result aforementioned aggrieved student had acquired 292 out of 600 marks but after the improvement exam, it has been 335 out of 600. Moreover, data were subject to scrutiny by the college administration through the original records made available by the students according to guideline which was found accurate so it was forwarded to the concerned department. Here this question arises that whether 292 marks out 600 of the student will not entitle him for the scholarship if entitle him for scholarship, then concerned staff cannot take recourse of the latter marks obtained after the improvement exam result declared as that total mark was not available to him when he was submitting online application for the scholarship. Thus the approach of the staff of the government of Uttar Pradesh is sheer unconstitutional, arbitrary, draconian and corrupt in nature which must be curbed by the accountable public functionaries if they are law abiding.
Grievance Document
Current Status -Under process
Date of Action -12/02/2019
Remarks -Send Through Web Service
Officer Concerns To Officer Name -Shri Kalyan Banerji
Officer Designation -Under Secretary
Contact Address -Chief Minister Secretariat U.P. Secretariat, Lucknow
Email Address Contact Number -05222215127
Pasted from

0 0 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
3 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Yogi
1 year ago

Grievance Status for registration number : PMOPG/E/2019/0075595 Grievance Concerns To Name Of Complainant -Yogi M P Singh Date of Receipt -07/02/2019 Received By Ministry/Department -Prime Ministers Office Grievance Description An application under article 51 A of the constitution of India. Whether it is justified to deprive a student of his scholarship arbitrarily on the ground that is because of improvement result declared by the MGKVP University Varanasi and concerned staff made the scrutiny on the ground of result of improvement while the application for the scholarship was submitted much earlier than the improvement result on the basis of the annual result B.Sc. second year

Beer Bhadra and Bhoomika

The reason for the scrutiny result to be suspect-obtain/total marks not matched with the university uploaded data. Most revered Sir –Whether the obtained result will not change after the declaration of the improvement result quite obvious from the attached Marksheet of B.Sc. second year after improvement exam conducted by MGKVP University Varanasi. Before the improvement result aforementioned aggrieved student had acquired 292 out of 600 marks but after the improvement exam, it has been 335 out of 600.Whether such scrutiny on the part of government is not arbitrary?

Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M. P. Singh

Undoubtedly concerned are playing cunning tricks in providing the scholarship to the girls student because they are vulnerable and can be easily cheated by adopting cunning tricks but they cannot oppose them. Whether it is not violation of human rights of the girls student they are being deprived are there scholarships arbitrarily. On one side of screen responsible public functionaries ARE advocating Social Justice but on the second side they itself playing cunning tricks to deprive them of their scholarship which is unconstitutional illegal and arbitrariness on the part of accountable public functionaries.