Whether it is justified that complainants may not be intimated by D.C.MG…

When munaadi was done in the entire village which was afforded by complainant and two times ,these corrupt public functionaries remained absent but third time without informing the complainants enquiry was carried out in the absent of real complainants who was projected as leader of complainants. .Why Deputy commissioner MGNREGA remained absent on fixed dates of enquiry which was fixed by him itself earlier on12.11.2014 & 27.12.2014  but today gone to village panchayat-Nibee Gaharwar ,Block-Chhanbey ,District-Mirzapur ,State-Uttar Pradesh along with assistant engineer D.R.D.A. And carried out enquiry in merely one hour in the absent of complainants? Why is he acting in caucus with the corrupts and making whole hearted efforts to give clean chit to them. Whether our public spirited approaches will go in vein as rule of law in the system has been replaced by sheer anarchy.   

With due respect your applicant wants to draw the kind attention of the Hon’ble Sir to the following submissions as follows.
1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that Date to carry out enquiry was fixed on 27/12/2014 but your applicant was informed 18/12/2014 through e-mail as obvious from following contents
  
 R N Singh P D Mirzapur
    Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 4:27 PM
To: BDO Chhanbey <bdo.chhanbey96@rediffmail.com>
 CDO,
MIRZAPUR
2650.jpeg
479K V
Pasted from <http://yogimpsingh.blogspot.in/2014/12/enquiry-officer-again-fixed-date.html>
As well as your applicant was made available the same copy as sent through aforesaid e-mail by the staff of C.D.O. Office two days latter and your applicant received the second copy as intimation that enquiry will be carried out by Deputy commissioner MGNREGA on 27-12-2014 along with assistant engineer. I couldn’t understand the cause of two times intimation but I informed the complainants in the said village panchayat .
2- It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that Date to carry out enquiry was when fixed on 12/11/2014 prior information was sent to complainants as well as copy was made available by staff of C.D.O. Office to your applicant which was received by your applicant.
3-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that today when Deputy commissioner was to actually carry out the enquiry ,neither any of complainants nor your applicant was informed by Deputy commissioner MGNREGA  and most surprising Surekapuram colony i.e. My residence  is merely at 500 meter from C.D.O. Office. 
This is humble request of your applicant to you Hon’ble Sir that It can never be justified to overlook  the rights of citizenry by delivering services in arbitrary manner by floating all set up norms. When the aggrieved are ready to accept all tyranny ,then why such circumstances are being created which couldn’t be tolerated by complainants. Whether it is justified that concerned department wants to loot the public fund meant to poor and downtrodden. It seems that honesty has no value otherwise genuine villagers raising voice against the wrongdoings erring staff of Government may not be harassed by erring staff. Please take actions in accordance with the law . For this your applicant shall ever pray you Hon’ble Sir.
                           ‘Yours  sincerely
                            Yogi M. P. Singh

Mohalla-Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road District-Mirzapur , Uttar Pradesh ,India .

2 comments on Whether it is justified that complainants may not be intimated by D.C.MG…

  1. 3-It is submitted before the Hon'ble Sir that today when Deputy commissioner was to actually carry out the enquiry ,neither any of complainants nor your applicant was informed by Deputy commissioner MGNREGA and most surprising Surekapuram colony i.e. My residence is merely at 500 meter from C.D.O. Office.
    This is humble request of your applicant to you Hon'ble Sir that It can never be justified to overlook the rights of citizenry by delivering services in arbitrary manner by floating all set up norms. When the aggrieved are ready to accept all tyranny ,then why such circumstances are being created which couldn't be tolerated by complainants. Whether it is justified that concerned department wants to loot the public fund meant to poor and downtrodden. It seems that honesty has no value otherwise genuine villagers raising voice against the wrongdoings erring staff of Government may not be harassed by erring staff. Please take actions in accordance with the law . For this your applicant shall ever pray you Hon'ble Sir.

  2. Complainants are necessary party of an enquiry and they must be properly informed before taking any action on their complaints .It have been proved fact that procrastination on the part of government functionaries in carrying out was well planned strategy to frustrate complainants.

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: