An appeal under subsection 3 of section 19 of Right to Information Act 2005 .
Click to teach Gmail this conversation is important.
Complaint-Yogi M. P. Singh
Mohalla-Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road
Respondents- 1-Public Information Officer in the office of Chief secretary, Government of Uttar Pradesh.
2-First Appellate authority in the office of Chief secretary , Government of Uttar Pradesh
3-Public Information Officer in the department of personnel ,Government of Uttar Pradesh.
4-First Appellate authority in the office of department of personnel , Government of Uttar Pradesh.
Prayer-No information was made available by concerned and denial of sought information on flimsy ground by the PIO was justified by First Appellate Authority through cryptic words.
Short submissions .
1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that –
1-Please made available the copy of counter affidavit submitted by the government of uttar pradesh to High court.
2-What action was taken by Government of Uttar Pradesh on the submissions of your applicant ? Please made available the noting on the representation of your applicant as aforesaid.
3-How much loss incurred to public exchequer because of this long lasting strike called by few employee unions in order to pressurize the government.
4-Whether action was taken against few leaders who indulged in criminal activity during the strike.
5-Whether the principle of no work no pay was applied on strikers as the strikes are declared illegal by apex court of India.
6-Who afforded the huge loss incurred on public exchequer due to this long lasted strike call by strikers under which provision of law of land.
2-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that
Public Information Officer is denying sought information on the ground that matter is concerned with the pending litigation. Here this question arises that under which provision of Right to information Act 2005 ,applicant was denied sought information? He can deny the sought information under section 8&9 of Transparency Act but section aforesaid have no such provision that if sought information concerned with pending litigation, then such information exempted from disclosure.
3-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that here role of first appellate authority is too much misleading and concealing the facts “as denial of information was considered by him as made available information by public information officer” through its letter dated 23-May-2014 as attachment to this e-mail.
This is humble request of your applicant to you Hon’ble Sir that aforesaid sought information be made available to your applicant. Those accountable for creating hurdle in furnishing sought information must penalized in accordance with the law. For this your applicant shall ever pray you Hon’ble Sir.
Yogi M. P. Singh
Mohalla-Surekapuram ,Jabalpur Road
District-Mirzapur ,State-Uttar Pradesh , Country- India