Whether independence of judiciary can be shield of wrongdoers.

To shield a wrongdoer on flimsy ground by overlooking complaints is
to promote anarchy in the system.
Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
10:23 PM (2 minutes ago)
    to pmosb, supremecourt, cj, hgovup, secypg, ddpg2-arpg, csup, urgent-action, cmup, lokayukta, uphrclko
With due respect your applicant wants to draw
the kind attention of the Hon’ble Sir to the following submissions as follows.
1-It is submitted before the
Hon’ble Sir that whether it is justified that the department which is to solve
the problems of citizens but denied to entertain the grievance by taking the
recourse of Article 235 of the constitution of India . Whether such denial will
not promote wrongdoings in the judiciary. Please take a glance of following
link-
http://yogimpsingh.blogspot.com/2013/12/sci-overlooked-submissions-by-taking.html
2- It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that
your applicant’s representation
dated 22.09.2013 addressed to PMO was referred to law ministry and ministry
through its under secretary  requested to Registrar General of High Court
at Allahabad through its letter 
   No.L-15012/10/2013-Jus 
             
           Government of India 
             
           Ministry of Law and Justice
             
           Department of Justice 
             
                 
 …………….
         
                     
                Jaisalmer House,Man
Singh Road
 Please take a glance of
following link-
3-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that
Supreme court denied to entertain the application against erring judicial staff
on the ground of article 235 .PMO forwarded the submitted application to
registrar High court at Allahabad and High court don’t want to take any action
on my submitted grievances as ipsofacto obvious. Who will safeguard Right to
justice as guaranteed right under article 32 of constitution of India.
 This is humble request to you Hon’ble Sir
that Hon’ble Sir may direct concerned staff of judiciary not to overlook the
grievances of a common man on flimsy ground. Your applicant spent entire life
in defending false and fabricated cases as consequent of conspiracy of corrupt
executives bureaucrats and judicial members. This is blatant abuse of process
of court and there is no judicial accountability.  Please ensure some one
may redress my grievances. My economic condition don’t allow to hire an
advocate. I need justice which must not be overlooked in the name of procedural
 lapse.  For this your applicant shall ever pray you Hon’ble Sir.
                            
 Yours sincerely
                           Yogi
M. P. Singh
Mohalla-Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road,
District-Mirzapur (U.P.) India.

2 comments on Whether independence of judiciary can be shield of wrongdoers.

  1. Hon'ble Sir that Supreme court denied to entertain the application against erring judicial staff on the ground of article 235 .PMO forwarded the submitted application to registrar High court at Allahabad and High court don't want to take any action on my submitted grievances as ipsofacto obvious. Who will safeguard Right to justice as guaranteed right under article 32 of constitution of India.

  2. अनुच्छेद २३५ का उद्देश्य न्याय प्रदान करना न की न्याय प्राप्त करने में बाधा पहुचाना पर यहाँ तो ऐसा प्रतीत होता हैं की २३५ का उद्देश्य जो था उसके ठीक विपरीत काम हो रहा हैं | मुग़ल बादशाह जहागीर ने अपने महल के समक्ष घंटा बधवा दिए थे जिससे हर गरीब को न्याय मिल सके किन्तु यहाँ तो गलत कार्य करने वाले सिस्टम को अपने हिसाब से एडजस्ट कर रखा हैं |

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: