Whether incredibility of temple of justice is because of its grown anarchy which made it handicapped .

Whether the incredibility of temple of justice in India is because of its tyrant members and grown anarchy which made it handicapped .

  

Add star  

Yogi M. P. Singh

<yogimpsingh@gmail.com>

AttachmentSat, Feb 14, 2015 at 10:10 PM
To: supremecourt <supremecourt@nic.in>, pmosb <pmosb@pmo.nic.in>, urgent-action <urgent-action@ohchr.org>, hgovup@up.nic.in, cmup <cmup@up.nic.in>, csup <csup@up.nic.in>
Whether the incredibility of temple of justice in India is because of its tyrant members and grown anarchy which made it handicapped .
14 February 2015
20:42
Whether without paying bribe a case can be listed in the courts. If not ,then how it is possible for a poor to seek justice in our courts where every one has to face cumbersome lengthy process which never lasts as evident from huge pending litigation in our various courts and non compliance of court orders by the bureaucrats and executives. It seems that measuring scale of corruption has lost so quantum of corruption in the machinery which has taken giant form is not visible  to our accountable public functionary.  
With due respect your applicant wants to draw the kind attention of the Hon’ble Sir to the following submissions as follows.
1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that whether any one will tell me that how the next likely date in the High court of judicature at Allahabad culminates into fixed date. Following petitioner who reinstated in service after long battle in the High court is still expecting one day High court will explain its order and he will seek justice from the court.
Case Status – Allahabad
Pending
Writ – A / 20121 / 2006 [Mirzapur]
Petitioner:
RAJENDRA PRATAP SINGH
Respondent:
STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS
Counsel (Pet.):
P.C. CHAUHAN
Counsel (Res.):
C.S.C.
Category:
Service-Writ Petitions Relating To Secondary Education (non Teaching Staff) (single Bench)-Salary And Allowances
Date of Filing:
10/04/2006
Last Listed on:
06/12/2007 in Court No. 25
Next Listing Date (Likely):
26/02/2015
This is not an authentic/certified copy of the information regarding status of a case. Authentic/certified information may be obtained under Chapter VIII Rule 30 of Allahabad High Court Rules. Mistake, if any, may be brought to the notice of OSD (Computer).
2-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that please take a glance of following link-
When next listing date (likely) will become fixed date on website of High court of judicature at Allahabad. Whether the writ  Writ – A / 20121 / 2006 [Mirzapur] will always remain pending as ipsofacto obvious from the working style.
3-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that please take a glance of following link-
To direct concerned to entertain my appeal in accordance with the law. Prayer-Rule 25 &26 of Allahabad High court (Right to Information)Rules 2006 are ultravires to Right to Information Act 2005 so that declared to be null &Registrar (A/C & Exam)/I/C Central Public Information Officer be directed to provide information as sought by information seeker.
How much ridiculous that rule 25 and 26 of Allahabad High court (Right to Information ) Rules ,2006 is contrary to spirit of this judgment but under force because transparency and accountability is main foe of judicial members working at judicature of High court at Allahabad . Here this question arises that what is the set up norm in order to get the information concerned with the compliance of High court order . Here information seeker is only seeking that after 8 years whether director secondary education has complied the High court order to submit counter affidavit and not the view point of judicial member or not trying to get redress of the grievance. Whether this is not anarchy that director secondary education didn’t comply the order of High court even after eight years. Here  CPIO don’t want to inform that Director secondary took under teeth the direction of High court by overlooking order of High court. As this will lower the image of court and every will know that what is going on in our courts.
This is humble request of your applicant to you Hon’ble Sir that It can never be justified to overlook  the rights of citizenry by delivering services in arbitrary manner by floating all set up norms. This is sheer mismanagement which is encouraging wrongdoers to reap benefit of loopholes in system and depriving poor citizens from right to justice. Therefore it is need of hour to take concrete steps in order to curb grown anarchy in the system. For this your applicant shall ever pray you Hon’ble Sir.
                           ‘Yours  sincerely
                            Yogi M. P. Singh
Mohalla-Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road District-Mirzapur , Uttar Pradesh ,India .
Created with Microsoft Office OneNote 2007
One place for all your notes and information


Whether the incredibility of tem.one
30K Scan and download

12 comments on Whether incredibility of temple of justice is because of its grown anarchy which made it handicapped .

  1. Here information seeker is only seeking that after 8 years whether director secondary education has complied the High court order to submit counter affidavit and not the view point of judicial member or not trying to get redress of the grievance. Whether this is not anarchy that director secondary education didn't comply the order of High court even after eight years. Here CPIO don't want to inform that Director secondary took under teeth the direction of High court by overlooking order of High court. As this will lower the image of court and every will know that what is going on in our courts.

  2. There open loot and listing Babu openly asks bribes to list the case. These corrupt practices depriving the poor and downtrodden class from seeking justice. No case is listed as usual. Corruption in high court is not hidden to any one.

  3. HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
    Case Status – Allahabad

    Pending
    Writ – A / 20121 / 2006 [Mirzapur]

    Petitioner: RAJENDRA PRATAP SINGH
    Respondent: STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS
    Counsel (Pet.): P.C. CHAUHAN
    Counsel (Res.): C.S.C.
    Category: Service-Writ Petitions Relating To Secondary Education (non Teaching Staff) (single Bench)-Salary And Allowances
    Date of Filing: 10/04/2006
    Last Listed on: 06/12/2007 in Court No. 25
    Next Listing Date (Likely): 12/03/2015
    This is not an authentic/certified copy of the information regarding status of a case. Authentic/certified information may be obtained under Chapter VIII Rule 30 of Allahabad High Court Rules. Mistake, if any, may be brought to the notice of OSD (Computer). What is the criteria to list a case for hearing in the High court of judicature at Allahabad?

  4. HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
    Case Status – Allahabad

    Pending
    Writ – A / 20121 / 2006 [Mirzapur]

    Petitioner: RAJENDRA PRATAP SINGH
    Respondent: STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS
    Counsel (Pet.): P.C. CHAUHAN
    Counsel (Res.): C.S.C.
    Category: Service-Writ Petitions Relating To Secondary Education (non Teaching Staff) (single Bench)-Salary And Allowances
    Date of Filing: 10/04/2006
    Last Listed on: 06/12/2007 in Court No. 25
    Next Listing Date (Likely): 28/05/2015
    This is not an authentic/certified copy of the information regarding status of a case. Authentic/certified information may be obtained under Chapter VIII Rule 30 of Allahabad High Court Rules. Mistake, if any, may be brought to the notice of OSD (Computer).

  5. HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
    Case Status – Allahabad

    Pending
    Writ – A / 20121 / 2006 [Mirzapur]

    Petitioner: RAJENDRA PRATAP SINGH
    Respondent: STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS
    Counsel (Pet.): P.C. CHAUHAN
    Counsel (Res.): C.S.C.
    Category: Service-Writ Petitions Relating To Secondary Education (non Teaching Staff) (single Bench)-Salary And Allowances
    Date of Filing: 10/04/2006
    Last Listed on: 06/12/2007 in Court No. 25
    Next Listing Date (Likely): 31/07/2015
    This is not an authentic/certified copy of the information regarding status of a case. Authentic/certified information may be obtained under Chapter VIII Rule 30 of Allahabad High Court Rules. Mistake, if any, may be brought to the notice of OSD (Computer).

  6. HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
    Case Status – Allahabad

    Pending
    Writ – A / 20121 / 2006 [Mirzapur]

    Petitioner: RAJENDRA PRATAP SINGH
    Respondent: STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS
    Counsel (Pet.): P.C. CHAUHAN
    Counsel (Res.): C.S.C.
    Category: Service-Writ Petitions Relating To Secondary Education (non Teaching Staff) (single Bench)-Salary And Allowances
    Date of Filing: 10/04/2006
    Last Listed on: 06/12/2007 in Court No. 25
    Next Listing Date (Likely): 14/08/2015
    This is not an authentic/certified copy of the information regarding status of a case. Authentic/certified information may be obtained under Chapter VIII Rule 30 of Allahabad High Court Rules. Mistake, if any, may be brought to the notice of OSD (Computer).

  7. HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
    Case Status – Allahabad

    Pending
    Writ – A / 20121 / 2006 [Mirzapur]

    Petitioner: RAJENDRA PRATAP SINGH
    Respondent: STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS
    Counsel (Pet.): P.C. CHAUHAN
    Counsel (Res.): C.S.C.
    Category: Service-Writ Petitions Relating To Secondary Education (non Teaching Staff) (single Bench)-Salary And Allowances
    Date of Filing: 10/04/2006
    Last Listed on: 06/12/2007 in Court No. 25
    Next Listing Date (Likely): 31/08/2015
    This is not an authentic/certified copy of the information regarding status of a case. Authentic/certified information may be obtained under Chapter VIII Rule 30 of Allahabad High Court Rules. Mistake, if any, may be brought to the notice of OSD (Computer).

  8. HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
    Case Status – Allahabad

    Pending
    Writ – A / 20121 / 2006 [Mirzapur]

    Petitioner: RAJENDRA PRATAP SINGH
    Respondent: STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS
    Counsel (Pet.): P.C. CHAUHAN
    Counsel (Res.): C.S.C.
    Category: Service-Writ Petitions Relating To Secondary Education (non Teaching Staff) (single Bench)-Salary And Allowances
    Date of Filing: 10/04/2006
    Last Listed on: 06/12/2007 in Court No. 25
    Next Listing Date (Likely): 04/09/2015
    This is not an authentic/certified copy of the information regarding status of a case. Authentic/certified information may be obtained under Chapter VIII Rule 30 of Allahabad High Court Rules. Mistake, if any, may be brought to the notice of OSD (Computer).

  9. HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
    Case Status – Allahabad

    Pending
    Writ – A / 20121 / 2006 [Mirzapur]

    Petitioner: RAJENDRA PRATAP SINGH
    Respondent: STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS
    Counsel (Pet.): P.C. CHAUHAN
    Counsel (Res.): C.S.C.
    Category: Service-Writ Petitions Relating To Secondary Education (non Teaching Staff) (single Bench)-Salary And Allowances
    Date of Filing: 10/04/2006
    Last Listed on: 06/12/2007 in Court No. 25
    Next Listing Date (Likely): 30/09/2015
    This is not an authentic/certified copy of the information regarding status of a case. Authentic/certified information may be obtained under Chapter VIII Rule 30 of Allahabad High Court Rules. Mistake, if any, may be brought to the notice of OSD (Computer).

  10. HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
    Case Status – Allahabad

    Pending
    Writ – A / 20121 / 2006 [Mirzapur]

    Petitioner: RAJENDRA PRATAP SINGH
    Respondent: STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS
    Counsel (Pet.): P.C. CHAUHAN
    Counsel (Res.): C.S.C.
    Category: Service-Writ Petitions Relating To Secondary Education (non Teaching Staff) (single Bench)-Salary And Allowances
    Date of Filing: 10/04/2006
    Last Listed on: 06/12/2007 in Court No. 25
    Next Listing Date (Likely): 30/10/2015
    This is not an authentic/certified copy of the information regarding status of a case. Authentic/certified information may be obtained under Chapter VIII Rule 30 of Allahabad High Court Rules. Mistake, if any, may be brought to the notice of OSD (Computer).

  11. HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
    Case Status – Allahabad

    Pending
    Writ – A / 20121 / 2006 [Mirzapur]

    Petitioner: RAJENDRA PRATAP SINGH
    Respondent: STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS
    Counsel (Pet.): P.C. CHAUHAN
    Counsel (Res.): C.S.C.
    Category: Service-Writ Petitions Relating To Secondary Education (non Teaching Staff) (single Bench)-Salary And Allowances
    Date of Filing: 10/04/2006
    Last Listed on: 06/12/2007 in Court No. 25
    Next Listing Date (Likely): There is no further order for listing!
    This is not an authentic/certified copy of the information regarding status of a case. Authentic/certified information may be obtained under Chapter VIII Rule 30 of Allahabad High Court Rules. Mistake, if any, may be brought to the notice of OSD (Computer).

  12. HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
    Case Status – Allahabad

    Pending
    Writ – A / 20121 / 2006 [Mirzapur]

    Petitioner: RAJENDRA PRATAP SINGH
    Respondent: STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS
    Counsel (Pet.): P.C. CHAUHAN
    Counsel (Res.): C.S.C.
    Category: Service-Writ Petitions Relating To Secondary Education (non Teaching Staff) (single Bench)-Salary And Allowances
    Date of Filing: 10/04/2006
    Last Listed on: 06/12/2007 in Court No. 25
    Next Listing Date: There is no further orders of listing.
    This is not an authentic/certified copy of the information regarding status of a case. Authentic/certified information may be obtained under Chapter VIII Rule 30 of Allahabad High Court Rules. Mistake, if any, may be brought to the notice of OSD (Computer).

    Back

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: