Whether income tax where corruption is rampant will not provide sought information as CIC is procrastinating

Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
When the appeal was admitted on 01/08/2017 by the registry of the central information commission then why not listed for hearing till now?
Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com> 27 April 2019 at 12:19

To: pmosb <pmosb@pmo.nic.in>, Anjali Anand Srivastava <secy-cic@nic.in>, registrar-cic@nic.in, supremecourt <supremecourt@nic.in>, presidentofindia@rb.nic.in, cmup <cmup@up.nic.in>, hgovup@up.nic.in

Reminder-CIC/DGITL/A/2017/603958, CIC/CCITL/A/2017/603842whether these appeals would be ever listed by the central information commission for hearing? 

Undoubtedly Central Information Commission is the transparency Ombudsman of this largest democracy in the world but the most relevant question about it is that when there is no transparency and accountability in the working of the transparency ombudsman, then how this office will ensure transparency and accountability in the working of the public authorities? Everyone knows that corruption is our main foe and those drawing huge amount from public exchequer as salary are not satisfied with that and indulged in the unethical practice to promote backdoor income. It is true fact that truth is before us but we are putting a screen on it on the flimsy ground to conceal its wrongdoings?  

 Those appeals which were filed in 2017 and admitted within one week were not listed for hearing up till now. On one side of the screen, our accountable public functionaries are talking of social justice for the weaker and downtrodden section but on the other side of the screen when the matter concerned with the serious allegations of corruption comes before them then they close their both eyes and ears. Whether the behaviour of our public functionaries is not like the inscrutable face sphinx. What our public functionaries speak in public and their working style both lack harmony and contrary to each other. What is the credibility of our institutions if not following the rule of law and if few public spirited people are criticizing then instead of taking a positive approach target the public-spirited people.

On Sun, 11 Nov 2018 at 23:57, Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com> wrote:
Subject-Sir file admitted date of FILE NUMBER: CIC/POSTS/A/2018/617852 is 24-04-2018 and listed for hearing on 18/06/2018 but file admitted dates of FILE NUMBER: CIC/CCITL/A/2017/603842 and   FILE NUMBER:  CIC/DGITL/A/2017/603958 are respectively 26/09/2017 and 01/08/2017 still to be listed for hearing. Whether it is the logistic approach of the central information commission? Apparently, there is full of flaws in the working style of the central information commission if not then concerned responsible functionaries may explain how such working style of the central information commission is justified?
Most revered Sir –Your applicant invites the kind attention of Hon’ble Sir with due respect to following submissions as follows.
1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that  51A. Fundamental duties It shall be the duty of every citizen of India (a) to abide by the Constitution and respect its ideals and institutions, the National Flag and the National Anthem;(h) to develop the scientific temper, humanism and the spirit of inquiry and reform;
(i) to safeguard public property and to abjure violence;
(j) to strive towards excellence in all spheres of individual and collective activity so that the nation constantly rises to higher levels of endeavour and achievement

 .

2-It is to be submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that following case admitted on 24/04/2018 and listed for hearing on 18/06/2018 but those appeals admitted one year earlier still to be listed as awaiting listing. Whether there are transparency and accountability in the listing of cases in the central information commission?
SEARCH RESULTS
RESULTS FOR FILE NUMBER: CIC/POSTS/A/2018/617852
PARTICULARS
DESCRIPTION
Name
Yogi M P Singh
Address
S/o Sh. Rajender Prasad Singh, Mohalla-Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road Distt. Mirzapur-231001
File No.
CIC/POSTS/A/2018/617852
File Admitted date
24-04-2018
DAK Status
Pertaining to CIC/IC
Madabhushanam Sridhar Acharyulu
Public Authority
Department of Posts
CPIO Address
ASST DIRECTOR RECRUITMENT & CPIO DEPARTMENT OF POSTS OFFICE OF THE CHIEF POSTMASTER GENERAL, U.P. CIRCLE, LUCKNOW PINCODE-226001
Speed Post number
Hearing notice issued — Hearing is scheduled and date and venue conveyed.
3-It is to be submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that following case filed one and a half year earlier but the registry is still procrastinating in regard to list the case. Undoubtedly the matter is serious and concerned with the deep-rooted corruption specifically tax evasion by colluding with the public staffs.
    SEARCH RESULTS
    RESULTS FOR DIARY NUMBER: 603842
    PARTICULARS
    DESCRIPTION
    Name
    Yogi M P Singh
    Address
    Yogi M. P. Singh Mobile number-7379105911 Mohalla-Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road District-Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh, India
    Diary No./Year
    603842/2017
    Diary Date
    22-07-2017
    DAK Status
    Complaint/Appeal Admitted
    File No.
    CIC/CCITL/A/2017/603842
    Pertaining to CIC/IC
    Bimal Julka
    Public Authority
    Chief Commissioner of Income Tax (CCA), Lucknow
    CPIO Address
    The CPIO & Income Tax Officer Income Tax Department Mirzapur
    Speed Post number
    Complaint/Appeal Admitted — Scrutiny has been done and Appeal/Complaint number is allotted.
SEARCH RESULTS
RESULTS FOR FILE NUMBER: CIC/CCITL/A/2017/603842
PARTICULARS
DESCRIPTION
Name
Yogi M P Singh
Address
Yogi M. P. Singh Mobile number-7379105911 Mohalla-Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road District-Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh, India
File No.
CIC/CCITL/A/2017/603842
File Admitted date
26-09-2017
DAK Status
Complaint/Appeal Admitted
Pertaining CIC/IC
Bimal Julka
Public Authority
Chief Commissioner of Income Tax (CCA), Lucknow
CPIO Address
The CPIO & Income Tax Officer Income Tax Department Mirzapur
Speed Post number
Complaint/Appeal Admitted — Scrutiny has been done and Appeal/Complaint number is allotted.
 When the status of the appeal on 8 June 2018 at 03:20 quite obvious from the attached e-mail representation, is showing that appeal has been admitted then how the today’s status is showing that appeal was admitted on 26/09/2017?
    4-It is to be submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that following case  File No. CIC/DGITL/A/2017/603958 filed one and a half year earlier but the registry is still procrastinating in regard to list the case. Undoubtedly the matter is serious and concerned with the deep-rooted corruption specifically tax evasion by colluding with the public staffs. 
    SEARCH RESULTS
    RESULTS FOR DIARY NUMBER: 603958
    PARTICULARS
    DESCRIPTION
    Name
    Yogi M P Singh
    Address
    Mohalla-Surekapuram Jabalpur Road, District-Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh, Pin code -231001
    Diary No./Year
    603958/2017
    Diary Date
    27-07-2017
    DAK Status
    Complaint/Appeal Admitted
    File No.
    CIC/DGITL/A/2017/603958
    Pertaining CIC/IC
    Bimal Julka
    Public Authority
    Direcot General of Income Tax (Inv.) Lucknow
    CPIO Address
    CPIO/ITO WARD 3(2) INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT MIRZAPUR PIN CODE 231001 UP
    Speed Post number
    Complaint/Appeal Admitted — Scrutiny has been done and Appeal/Complaint number is allotted.
SEARCH RESULTS
RESULTS FOR FILE NUMBER: CIC/DGITL/A/2017/603958
PARTICULARS
DESCRIPTION
Name
Yogi M P Singh
Address
Mohalla-Surekapuram Jabalpur Road, District-Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh, Pin code -231001
File No.
CIC/DGITL/A/2017/603958
File Admitted date
01-08-2017
DAK Status
Complaint/Appeal Admitted
Pertaining to CIC/IC
Bimal Julka
Public Authority
Direcot General of Income Tax (Inv.) Lucknow
CPIO Address
CPIO/ITO WARD 3(2) INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT MIRZAPUR PIN CODE 231001 UP
Speed Post number
Complaint/Appeal Admitted — Scrutiny has been done and Appeal/Complaint number is allotted.
 When the status of the appeal on 8 June 2018 at 03:20 quite obvious from the attached e-mail representation, is showing that appeal has been admitted then how the today’s status is showing that appeal was admitted on 01/08/2017? Whether such dealings of the CIC are not cryptic?
This is a humble request of your applicant to you Hon’ble Sir that how can it be justified to withhold public services arbitrarily and promote anarchy, lawlessness and chaos in an arbitrary manner by making the mockery of law of land? There is need of the hour to take harsh steps against the wrongdoer in order to win the confidence of citizenry and strengthen the democratic values for healthy and prosperous democracy. For this, your applicant shall ever pray you, Hon’ble Sir.                                                          Yours sincerely
Date-1111-2018              Yogi M. P. Singh, Mobile number-7379105911, 9794103433

 , 9336252631,

 Mohalla- Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road, District-Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh, Pin code-231001.



The body having liabilities to ensure transparency and accountability itself.pdf
1574K

0 0 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
3 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Yogi
1 year ago

Those appeals which were filed in 2017 and admitted within one week were not listed for hearing up till now. On one side of the screen, our accountable public functionaries are talking of social justice for the weaker and downtrodden section but on the other side of the screen when the matter concerned with the serious allegations of corruption comes before them then they close their both eyes and ears. Whether the behaviour of our public functionaries is not like the inscrutable face sphinx. What our public functionaries speak in public and their working style both lack harmony and contrary to each other.

Preeti Singh
1 year ago

Undoubtedly the following questions are relevant but our public functionaries are never interested to apply their minds to observed correct things.
Undoubtedly Central Information Commission is the transparency Ombudsman of this largest democracy in the world but the most relevant question about it is that when there is no transparency and accountability in the working of the transparency ombudsman, then how this office will ensure transparency and accountability in the working of the public authorities?

Beerbhadra Singh
1 year ago

When the case was admitted on 1st August 2017 then why Central information commission is not entertaining the case and even once case was not listed and this is year 2019. Whether fragment of honesty is there in such activities of the Central information commission in which transparency ombudsman itself procrastinating in the matter which is not only surprising but itself a reflection of Anarchy in its function. Everyone knows that money overflows in the department of of income tax Government of India so if transparency ombudsman is procrastinating then there is no surprising ain this matter.