Whether in this cryptic style submitted grievances on public grievance portal of India are redressed.

Grievance Status

Print || Logout
Status as on 25 Sep 2016

Registration Number : GOVUP/E/2016/00380
Name Of Complainant : Yogi M P Singh
Date of Receipt : 31 Jan 2016
Received by : Government of Uttar Pradesh
Forwarded to : Government of Uttar Pradesh
Contact Address : Chief Minister Secretariat
U.P. Secretariat,
Lucknow226001
Contact Number : 05222215137
Grievance Description : Whether a registrar has moral right to remain at the post of Registrar of Uttar Pradesh state information commission who can’t distinguish between R.T.I. Cmmunique submitted under subsection 1 of section 6 of Right to Information Act 2005 and an appeal submitted under subsection 3 of section 19 of Right to Information Act 2005 before the commission. With due respect your applicant wants to draw the kind attention of the Hon’ble Sir to the following submissions as follows. 1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that please take a glance of subsection 1 of section 6 of Right to Information Act 2005. 6 (1)   A person, who desires to obtain any information under this Act, shall make a request in writing or through electronic means in English or Hindi or in the official language of the area in which the application is being made, accompanying such fee as may be prescribed, to—     (a) the Central Public Information Officer or State Public Information Officer, as the case may be, of the concerned public authority;     (b) the Central Assistant Public Information Officer or State Assistant Public Information Officer, as the case may be, specifying the particulars of the information sought by him or her: Provided that where such request cannot be made in writing, the Central Public Information Officer or State Public Information Officer, as the case may be, shall render all reasonable assistance to the person making the request orally to reduce the same in writing. 2-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that please take a glance of subsection 3 of section 19 of Right to Information Act 2005. (3) A second appeal against the decision under sub-section (1) shall lie within ninety days from the date on which the decision should have been made or was actually received, with the Central Information Commission or the State Information Commission: 3-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that whether under subsection 1 of section 6 of Right to Information Act 2005,information is sought or appeal is made. According to Registrar,UPSIC appeal is made as ipsofacto obvious from the aforesaid letter . In the individual view of your applicant ,post of registrar is an accountable post who must be well acquainted with the law of land if not feasible at least has knowledge of provisions of Right to Information Act 2005. 4-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that according to him your applicant didn’t  submit the first appeal under subsection 1 of section 19 of Right to Information Act 2005. Hon’ble Sir first appeal is obligatory but not mandatory requirement for the second appeal filed under subsection 3 of section 19 but most blunder was committed by the registrar UPSIC is that he considered R.T.I. Communique under subsection 1 of section 6 of Right to Information Act 2005 as appeal submitted under subsection 3 of section 19 of Right to Information Act 2005 deliberately in order to withhold sought information. This is reflexion of dubious character of registrar ,Uttar Pradesh state information commission. 5-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that most surprising fact is that an individual appointed at the post registrar can’t differentiate between R.T.I. Communique and R.T.I. Appeal . This incompetent person treated R.T.I. Communique as an appeal while postal order as R.T.I. Fee was attached with the communication and in Uttar Pradesh ,fee is charged under subsection 1 of section 6 of Right to Information Act 2005 but not under section 19(1) and 19(3). Please take a glance of attached documents with this representation.
Current Status : CASE CLOSED
Date of Action : 30 Jul 2016
Details : सन्दर्भ संख्या 60000160000397, श्रीा योगी एम0पी0 सिंह के संबंध में।

3 comments on Whether in this cryptic style submitted grievances on public grievance portal of India are redressed.

  1. Whether a registrar has moral right to remain at the post of Registrar of Uttar Pradesh state information commission who can't distinguish between R.T.I. Cmmunique submitted under subsection 1 of section 6 of Right to Information Act 2005 and an appeal submitted under subsection 3 of section 19 of Right to Information Act 2005 before the commission.

  2. Details : सन्दर्भ संख्या 60000160000397, श्रीा योगी एम0पी0 सिंह के संबंध में।It has been quite rampant practice in the government machinery that letters of aggrieved forwarded to concerned staffs who are indulged in persecuting the aggrieved for action and it is crystal clear that consequently suck the dust in the office of wrongdoers .

  3. Rule of law implies that no man is above the law of land but it seems that we are living in an anarchy where all the provisions of law of land are kept at bay by the public functionaries.

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: