Whether I.G. Amitabh Thakur is being awarded for his honesty in the government of Uttar Pradesh.

Whether it is justified that an honest senior rank
police officer is being persecuted by senior accountable public functionaries
in the Government of Uttar Pradesh and Government of India is the mute
spectators of this injustice.
LUCKNOW: The
Vigilance department on Tuesday conducted searches at the Gomti Nagar residence
of suspended IPS officer Amitabh Thakur.
The raids come two
days after Thakur lodged a complaint at city’s Vibhuti Khand police station,
seeking registration of a case against UP Vigilance Establishment Director
Bhanu Pratap Singh and others for alleged misrepresentation of facts in the
Vigilance inquiry report against Thakur.
In view of your friend, every one has right to seek
the justice and whatever was done by Mr. Amitabh Thakur Ji with sole aim to
seek justice but as reaction to holy act, counter action was made in order to
wreak vengeance.
Thakur was suspended
after he lodged a police complaint against Samajwadi Party national president
Mulayam Singh Yadav, accusing him of threatening the IPS on phone. He has been
attached to the Director General of Police (DGP) headquarters ever since.
Whether in this largest democracy in the world ,no one has right to
seek justice . If some one is threatening an I.P.S. Personnel on his mobile
phone and he makes efforts to seek legitimate action ,then what is wrong?
Whether it is justified that entire machinery may be misused in order to harass
an honest police personnel. Every one knows that there is no rule of law in the
government of Uttar Pradesh. Whether a country has right to get permanent
membership of U.N.O. where rampant violation of human rights and its prime post
holder be remained mute spectators of such practices.
In his police
complaint against the Vigilance department chief and his subordinates, Amitabh
had stated that an open inquiry was ordered against him by the government but
the Vigilance department has prepared a list of properties owned by his
parents, brother, wife and an organisation that he was earlier attached to, and
showed them as his assets.
He
said neither he nor his relatives were given a chance to explain about the
acquisition of those properties.
Whether  this
is not arbitrary action of the government. Both constitutional and human rights
are being violated of this honest police officer.
The Vigilance had
lodged an FIR against Thakur last month.
LUCKNOW:
Suspended IPS officer Amitabh Thakur on Thursday sat in front of Hazratganj
police station along with some friends as part of his `indefinite sit-in’ to
protest police inaction in Mulayam threat case. 
Why police
is procrastinating in this matter and adopting lackadaisical approach to reach
on conclusive stage of the case ? Whether such act of state police is not
lowering the dignity of police organization .
The
police has not lodged FIR against Samajwadi Party chief Mulayam Singh Yadav so
far despite Lucknow Chief Judicial Magistrate Som Prabha Mishra’s specific
directions on September 16. The SP government had also assured High Court on
Wednesday that the FIR will be registered forthwith. But no action has been
taken as yet. 
Where is independence of judiciary? This is job of
independence of judiciary to provide all kind of protection to judicial member
so that he may perform his job fearlessly and without bowing its head before
undue pressure. It is most unfortunate that independence is being used  to 
protect wrongdoers in the judiciary and withholding delivery of justice
to poor.
Amitabh had lodged a
complaint in Hazratganj police station against Mulayam for threatening him on
phone on July 10. He said that he was threatened because activist wife Nutan
had lodged complaint against a corrupt minister in state government. In retaliation,
the UP government had suspended Amitabh on July 13, 2015, and slapped with a 16
point charge-sheet. Amitabh approached the CJM court which on September 16
directed Lucknow police to lodge FIR against Mulayam. However, on the same day
(September 16), after a `quick’ inquiry, on the recommendation the Vigilance
department, the state government lodged an FIR against Amitabh under Prevention
of Corruption Act for amassing assets beyond his known sources of income.
Subsequently, Amitabh moved High Court. 
Thakur maintained
that it is a rule in any open inquiry, before declaring any property benami,
the Vigilance should give the owners and suspected beneficiary a chance to
explain. He claimed this was not done in order to implicate him in a hurried
manner.
Vigilance raid at my house. Vigilance officers stopped me
and wife from going for our Court case despite telling… 
http://t.co/hWRpbJJjst
— AmitabhThakur (@Amitabhthakur) October 13,
2015
The
IPS officer has sought registration of FIR against Vigilance chief Bhanu Pratap
Singh, SP Ghanshyam Chaurasiya and Vigilance Inspector Mahesh Singh, claiming
that the three should be booked under sections 166 and 167 of the IPC, which
pertains to a “public servant framing an incorrect document with intent to
cause injury”.
This is justified demand and concerned may accept
the demand of aggrieved.
The
Uttar Pradesh government had suspended Thakur in July, claiming that the
officer was found prima facie guilty of “indiscipline” — having an
anti-government point of view — and other charges. The suspension came days
after Thakur made public an audio recording in which, he alleged, Samajwadi
Party president Mulayam Singh Yadav had threatened him.
Ulterior  motive 
of state Government functionaries is obvious from the aforesaid story.
Credibility of government functionaries can be easily guessed from the fact
that wrongdoer I.A.S. Personnel were reinstated in the service by telling
lacunae of officers in the state.
LUCKNOW: Chief
Judicial Magistrate (CJM) of Lucknow, Hitendra Hari, will hear a complaint
filed by suspended Indian Police Service (IPS) officer Amitabh Thakur against
the vigilance department, on Tuesday. 
Amitabh in his
complaint registered under section 156(3) of the Criminal Procedure Court on
Monday, accused vigilance director Bhanu Pratap Singh, SP vigilance GS Kanaujia
and other vigilance officers of “creating a false document” during an
inquiry to build a disproportionate assets case against him `with an intent to
cause injury.’ 
Thakur approached
the court after police refused to lodge an FIR. 
In the complaint,
Thakur has said that the vigilance establishment under Singh, had arbitrarily
and deliberately calculated the worth of his assets at Rs 2.16 crore. When the
state government provided him a copy of his alleged assets at the directions of
the Allahabad High Court, Thakur alleged that he found that 14 out of these 15
properties belonged to his relatives and only one asset belongs to him. Yet, he
said, the officers created a false report declaring others’ assets as his
“merely to please their political master.” 
Calling it a
cognizable offence under sections 166, 167, 214, 120B IPC, Thakur had lodged a
complaint in Vibhuti Khand police station on October 9. However, station
officer OP Tiwari had refused to give a receipt of the complaint. 
Thakur said he had a
right to get a receipt under section 154(1) CrPC and UP Janhit Guarantee
Act. 
On October 10, he
sent a registered letter to the SSP of Lucknow, asking for the registration of
the FIR under section 154(3) CrPC and also sought action against SO Vibhuti
Khand.

2 comments on Whether I.G. Amitabh Thakur is being awarded for his honesty in the government of Uttar Pradesh.

  1. Whether in this largest democracy in the world ,no one has right to seek justice . If some one is threatening an I.P.S. Personnel on his mobile phone and he makes efforts to seek legitimate action ,then what is wrong? Whether it is justified that entire machinery may be misused in order to harass an honest police personnel. Every one knows that there is no rule of law in the government of Uttar Pradesh. Whether a country has right to get permanent membership of U.N.O. where rampant violation of human rights and its prime post holder be remained mute spectators of such practices.

  2. When evidences are created against and favour of an individual in the government of Uttar Pradesh, then who is safe in this anarchy? An honest IPS is suffering because of its honesty. Think about miserable condition of poor and downtrodden section in this largest state of Indi.. Whether such act of government functionaries are not lowering the credibility of government institutions in the eye of citizenry.

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: