Whether grievances of PMO reference are taken so negligently by the staffs of Government of U.P.

आवेदन
का विवरण
शिकायत
संख्या
60000190124803
आवेदक कर्ता का
नाम:
Amit Kumar Singh
आवेदक कर्ता का
मोबाइल न०:
9125969897,
विषय:
Every one knows that role of the police of the state is of the
prosecuting agency which prosecute those people before the court of law who
break the law of land which means those individuals act against the spirit of
constitution. Prosecution of the offender and to be instrumental in
culmination of the prosecution in punishment through the court of law is the
function of the state police. Whether to seek justice in this largest
democracy in the world makes a man guilty in the eye of police of the government
of Uttar Pradesh quite obvious from the attached document to this
representation. Sir according to the report of the circle officer Sadar dated
02/08/2019 attached to document, station officer of police station
Vindhyachal has been directed to take action on both the parties under
section Cr.P.C. 107/116 of criminal penal code subject to huge sureties. Most
surprising is that there are three reports submitted by three police officers
in which aforementioned para is common. Most respectfully, with due respect,
the applicant Amit Kumar Singh son of Mr. Akhilesh Singh, Village and post
-Babura, District-Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh, PIN Code-231001 wants to draw the
kind attention of the most revered Prime minister, chief minister and
Honourable superintendent of Police Mirzapur to the following submissions as
follows. 1-Matter is concerned with the lackadaisical approach of station
officer police station-Vindhyachal in regard to complaint
number-40019919021504 submitted by the applicant on 21-May-2019 and report of
police station through station officer was submitted on 28-May-2019.
2-Applicant aggrieved with the partial approach of the station officer in the
matter concerned, police station -Vindhyachal District -Mirzapur, submitted
the feedback in order to revive the submitted grievance on 29-May-2019 quite
obvious from the attached documents i.e. print of the complaint as
aforementioned. 3-After feedback, grievance was revived and categorized in C
category but most surprising is that concerned officer managed to get the
grievance closed by submitting the same report on the Jansunwai portal of the
government of Uttar Pradesh which is mockery of the law of land. 4-Circle
officer and investigation officers did not resolve the issue that how the
opposition party can take away two tractors crop and applicant only one
tractor yet applicant and his family is the offender. 5-Since the month of
March, aggrieved father of the applicant is seeking interference of police in
the matter and police concerned remained reluctant and did not make any
initiative in the matter and now when the applicant is making representation
to various accountable public functionaries in order to seek justice, then
applicant and his peace loving father who is a teacher by profession are the
great danger to the peace and tranquility of the area. 6-Sir, whether to seek
justice is an offence in this largest democracy in the world? Why police is
silent in regard to two tractors of crops taken away by offenders which is
the core issue of the tussle and every one is apprised with this simple and
straight facts but police investigating matter is putting carpet on it.
Whether it is not reflection of inscrutable face sphinx? 7-Sir, whether
police in the government of Uttar Pradesh does not redress the grievances of
the common people in accordance with the submissions of the grievances but
through a parrot reply not consistent with the contents of the submissions
ipso facto obvious from the attached reports submitted on the august portal.
Date-07-08-2019 Yours sincerely Amit Kumar Singh S/O Akhilesh Singh address
as aforementioned.
नियत तिथि:
18 – Sep – 2019
शिकायत की स्थिति:
निस्तारित
रिमाइंडर :
फीडबैक :
दिनांक 30/09/2019को फीडबैक:- आख्‍या अपलोड। प्रकरण में ग्राम में गंगा किनारे रेता की भूमि में बाेयी गयी फसल कटाई का
विवाद था, गेहूँ की
फसल अब
कट गयी है। प्रकरण का निस्‍तारण किये जाने हेतु आख्‍या प्रेषित। Sir what a justice delivery system in this
largest democracy in the world. Marvellous, here applicant is raising the
matter concerned with the injustice done with the applicant and Tahsildar
sadar has closed the matter on a flimsy ground without taking the cognizance
of the serious issue raised by the aggrieved applicant. Whether it is
justified on the part of the Tahsildar sadar that he submitted the report on
the august portal Jansunwai of the government of Uttar Pradesh without taking
the cognizance of the submissions of the aggrieved applicant moreover it was
not deemed fit by him before submitting the closure report in the matter to
call upon the aggrieved applicant to be apprised with the matter of fact as
the factual position of the case might be instrumental in reaching at any
logical conclusion. Here core point of the controversy is the non
impartial approach of the police concerned in the matter ipso facto
obvious from the contents of the submissions of the grievance. Here this question
arises that who reaped the crop by taking under teeth the direction of the
Tahsildar sadar? Undoubtedly the crop was sowed on the part of the applicant
but opposition took mileage by forcibly taking it through the muscle power
and taking police concerned in good faith. In order to curb such criminal
activities which may result in havoc, need of the hour is to take action
against wrongdoers but because of the biased approach of the concerned
incredible police, entire efforts of the applicant gone in the vain. Now
Tahsildar Sadar instead reaching on the justified conclusion in the matter
only busy in closing the grievance arbitrarily. Sir Right to reason is the
indispensable part of the judicial, quasi and administrative decisions.
Whether the decision of the Tahsildar sadar to close the grievance
arbitrarily is a reasoned decision? Sir please relook into the matter of fact
of the submitted grievance in order to provide justice and establish the rule
of law in system so that faith of the citizenry in the government machinery
may be enhanced. 
फीडबैक की स्थिति:
फीडबैक
प्राप्त

आवेदन
का संलग्नक

अग्रसारित विवरण

क्र..
सन्दर्भ
का प्रकार
आदेश
देने वाले अधिकारी
आदेश
दिनांक
अधिकारी
को प्रेषित
आदेश
आख्या
दिनांक
आख्या
स्थिति
आख्या
रिपोर्ट
1
अंतरित
लोक शिकायत अनुभाग – 1(मुख्यमंत्री कार्यालय )
03 – Sep – 2019
जिलाधिकारीमिर्ज़ापुर,
कृपया
शीघ्र नियमानुसार कार्यवाही किये जाने की अपेक्षा की गई है।
24/09/2019
अधीनस्थ
अधिकारी के स्तर पर निस्तारित
निक्षेपित
2
अंतरित
जिलाधिकारी ( )
03 – Sep – 2019
उप
जिलाधि‍कारी सदर,जनपदमिर्ज़ापुर,राजस्व एवं आपदा विभाग
नियमनुसार आवश्यक कार्यवाही करें 
24/09/2019
अधीनस्थ
अधिकारी के स्तर पर निस्तारित
निक्षेपित
3
अंतरित
उप
जिलाधि‍कारी (राजस्व एवं आपदा विभाग )
03 – Sep – 2019
तहसीलदार सदर,जनपदमिर्ज़ापुर,राजस्व एवं आपदा विभाग
नियमनुसार आवश्यक कार्यवाही करें 
24/09/2019
आख्‍या अपलोड। प्रकरण में ग्राम में गंगा किनारे रेता की भूमि में बाेयी गयी फसल कटाई का
विवाद था, गेहूँ की
फसल अब
कट गयी है। प्रकरण का निस्‍तारण किये जाने हेतु आख्‍या प्रेषित।
निस्तारित

आवेदन
का विवरण
शिकायत
संख्या
60000190124803
आवेदक कर्ता का
नाम:
Amit Kumar Singh
आवेदक कर्ता का
मोबाइल न०:
9125969897,
विषय:
Every one knows that role of the police of the state is of the
prosecuting agency which prosecute those people before the court of law who
break the law of land which means those individuals act against the spirit of
constitution. Prosecution of the offender and to be instrumental in
culmination of the prosecution in punishment through the court of law is the
function of the state police. Whether to seek justice in this largest
democracy in the world makes a man guilty in the eye of police of the government
of Uttar Pradesh quite obvious from the attached document to this
representation. Sir according to the report of the circle officer Sadar dated
02/08/2019 attached to document, station officer of police station
Vindhyachal has been directed to take action on both the parties under
section Cr.P.C. 107/116 of criminal penal code subject to huge sureties. Most
surprising is that there are three reports submitted by three police officers
in which aforementioned para is common. Most respectfully, with due respect,
the applicant Amit Kumar Singh son of Mr. Akhilesh Singh, Village and post
-Babura, District-Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh, PIN Code-231001 wants to draw the
kind attention of the most revered Prime minister, chief minister and
Honourable superintendent of Police Mirzapur to the following submissions as
follows. 1-Matter is concerned with the lackadaisical approach of station
officer police station-Vindhyachal in regard to complaint
number-40019919021504 submitted by the applicant on 21-May-2019 and report of
police station through station officer was submitted on 28-May-2019.
2-Applicant aggrieved with the partial approach of the station officer in the
matter concerned, police station -Vindhyachal District -Mirzapur, submitted
the feedback in order to revive the submitted grievance on 29-May-2019 quite
obvious from the attached documents i.e. print of the complaint as
aforementioned. 3-After feedback, grievance was revived and categorized in C
category but most surprising is that concerned officer managed to get the
grievance closed by submitting the same report on the Jansunwai portal of the
government of Uttar Pradesh which is mockery of the law of land. 4-Circle
officer and investigation officers did not resolve the issue that how the
opposition party can take away two tractors crop and applicant only one
tractor yet applicant and his family is the offender. 5-Since the month of
March, aggrieved father of the applicant is seeking interference of police in
the matter and police concerned remained reluctant and did not make any
initiative in the matter and now when the applicant is making representation
to various accountable public functionaries in order to seek justice, then
applicant and his peace loving father who is a teacher by profession are the
great danger to the peace and tranquility of the area. 6-Sir, whether to seek
justice is an offence in this largest democracy in the world? Why police is
silent in regard to two tractors of crops taken away by offenders which is
the core issue of the tussle and every one is apprised with this simple and
straight facts but police investigating matter is putting carpet on it.
Whether it is not reflection of inscrutable face sphinx? 7-Sir, whether
police in the government of Uttar Pradesh does not redress the grievances of
the common people in accordance with the submissions of the grievances but
through a parrot reply not consistent with the contents of the submissions
ipso facto obvious from the attached reports submitted on the august portal.
Date-07-08-2019 Yours sincerely Amit Kumar Singh S/O Akhilesh Singh address
as aforementioned.
नियत तिथि:
18 – Sep – 2019
शिकायत की स्थिति:
निस्तारित
रिमाइंडर :
फीडबैक :
फीडबैक की स्थिति:

आवेदन
का संलग्नक

अग्रसारित विवरण

क्र..
सन्दर्भ
का प्रकार
आदेश
देने वाले अधिकारी
आदेश
दिनांक
अधिकारी
को प्रेषित
आदेश
आख्या
दिनांक
आख्या
स्थिति
आख्या
रिपोर्ट
1
अंतरित
लोक शिकायत अनुभाग – 1(मुख्यमंत्री कार्यालय )
03 – Sep – 2019
जिलाधिकारीमिर्ज़ापुर,
कृपया
शीघ्र नियमानुसार कार्यवाही किये जाने की अपेक्षा की गई है।
24/09/2019
अधीनस्थ
अधिकारी के स्तर पर निस्तारित
निक्षेपित
2
अंतरित
जिलाधिकारी ( )
03 – Sep – 2019
उप
जिलाधि‍कारी सदर,जनपदमिर्ज़ापुर,राजस्व एवं आपदा विभाग
नियमनुसार आवश्यक कार्यवाही करें 
24/09/2019
अधीनस्थ
अधिकारी के स्तर पर निस्तारित
निक्षेपित
3
अंतरित
उप
जिलाधि‍कारी (राजस्व एवं आपदा विभाग )
03 – Sep – 2019
तहसीलदार सदर,जनपदमिर्ज़ापुर,राजस्व एवं आपदा विभाग
नियमनुसार आवश्यक कार्यवाही करें 
24/09/2019
आख्‍या अपलोड। प्रकरण में ग्राम में गंगा किनारे रेता की भूमि में बाेयी गयी फसल कटाई का
विवाद था, गेहूँ की
फसल अब
कट गयी है। प्रकरण का निस्‍तारण किये जाने हेतु आख्‍या प्रेषित।
निस्तारित

3 comments on Whether grievances of PMO reference are taken so negligently by the staffs of Government of U.P.

  1. Whether it is justified on the part of the Tahsildar sadar that he submitted the report on the august portal Jansunwai of the government of Uttar Pradesh without taking the cognizance of the submissions of the aggrieved applicant moreover it was not deemed fit by him before submitting the closure report in the matter to call upon the aggrieved applicant to be apprised with the matter of fact as the factual position of the case might be instrumental in reaching at any logical conclusion.

  2. Whether arbitrary report submitted by tahsildar Sadar in the matter is justified why government is not taking any action against such staffs who are making mockery of the law of land itself. Sir what a justice delivery system in this largest democracy in the world. Marvellous, here applicant is raising the matter concerned with the injustice done with the applicant and Tahsildar sadar has closed the matter on a flimsy ground without taking the cognizance of the serious issue raised by the aggrieved applicant. Whether it is justified on the part of the Tahsildar sadar that he submitted the report on the august portal Jansunwai of the government of Uttar Pradesh without taking the cognizance of the submissions of the aggrieved applicant.

  3. Whether law provides us justice or anarchy and here it is quite obvious that police is favouring the sides of muscle even when they are wrong.Here police always supports the wrong side because source of backdoor income.
    Since the month of March, aggrieved father of the applicant is seeking interference of police in the matter and police concerned remained reluctant and did not make any initiative in the matter and now when the applicant is making representation to various accountable public functionaries in order to seek justice, then applicant and his peace loving father who is a teacher by profession are the great danger to the peace and tranquillity of the area

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: