Whether government of U. P. will set scot free to D.S.O. even after substantial evidence of commission of forgery

Grievance Status for registration number : GOVUP/E/2020/20676

Grievance Concerns To
Name Of Complainant
Yogi M. P. Singh
Date of Receipt
13/07/2020
Received By Ministry/Department
Uttar Pradesh
Grievance Description
Grievance Status for registration number: GOVUP/E/2020/14674
Grievance Concerns To Name Of Complainant-Yogi M. P. Singh Date of Receipt-29/05/2020
It is most surprising that entire public functionaries know that district supply officer Mirzapur submitted the Forged report in the name of yogi M P Singh on the jansunwai portal of the Government of Uttar Pradesh which is a mockery of the law of land and wrongdoer must not be spared who committed a serious offence but it seems that concerned public functionaries have set up their mood to discharge the wrongdoer public staff which is quite obvious from their cryptic working style.
Ipso facto obvious that matter is not concerned with the unit of a Ration card of Sadhana Singh so attached report of the D.S.O. Mirzapur is quite inconsistent and misleading in the aforementioned grievance so disciplinary proceedings must be initiated against him as he remained failed to prove his innocence in the matter that why forged affidavit was submitted on the part of him on the Jansunwai portal and public grievance portal as aforementioned. The matter is quite simple if the affidavit of Yogi M. P. Singh submitted by D.S.O. Mirzapur on the aforementioned portals is really of Yogi M. P. Singh, then it is not an offence but here D.S.O. submitted affidavit of Yogi M. P. Singh not of Yogi M. P. Singh but a forged affidavit prepared by him with an ulterior motive to manage the submitted grievance by Yogi M. P. Singh to get disposed of.
District Supply Officer has only misled the concerned senior rank staffs as the aforementioned affidavit is not the affidavit of the applicant Yogi M. P. Singh and the applicant claims that no staff of D.S.O. Mirzapur submitted forged documents before the senior rank officers ever met him so he must be subjected to scrutiny under sections 465,466,467,468,469 and 471 of I.P.C. Section 465 in The Indian Penal Code-Whoever commits forgery shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both. Section 466 in The Indian Penal Code 466. Forgery of record of Court or public register, etc. IPC 467: Section 467 of the Indian Penal Code Forgery of valuable security, will, etc. IPC 468: Section 468 of the Indian Penal Code Forgery for purpose of cheating. Section 469 in The Indian Penal Code 469. Forgery for purpose of harming reputation. Section 471 in The Indian Penal Code 471. Using as genuine a forged document or electronic record is an offence committed by the D.S.O. Mirzapur which is punishable under Indian Penal Code.
Grievance Document
Current Status
Grievance received
Date of Action
13/07/2020
Officer Concerns To
Forwarded to
Uttar Pradesh
Officer Name
Shri Arun Kumar Dube
Officer Designation
Joint Secretary
Contact Address
Chief Minister Secretariat U.P. Secretariat, Lucknow
Email Address
sushil7769@gmail.com
Contact Number
0522 2226349

Grievance Status for registration number : GOVUP/E/2020/14674

Grievance Concerns To
Name Of Complainant
Yogi M. P. Singh
Date of Receipt
29/05/2020
Received By Ministry/Department
Uttar Pradesh
Grievance Description
Corruption is so rampant in the district supply officer Mirzapur office that neither action was taken against the wrongdoer public staff nor applicant was made available his detail. Undoubtedly government staff committed a serious offence but sparing him to be a more serious offence. D.S.O. Mirzapur is itself wrongdoer because the report was submitted on behalf of him and still he is only procrastinating on the matter.
It is most surprising that entire public functionaries know that district supply officer Mirzapur submitted the Forged report in the name of yogi M P Singh on the Jansunwai portal of the Government of Uttar Pradesh which is mockery of the law of land and wrongdoer must not be spared who committed a serious offence but it seems that concerned public functionaries have set up their mood to discharge the wrongdoer public staff which is quite obvious from their cryptic working style. By setting the wrongdoer free, undoubtedly we are promoting corruption in the government machinery but it seems that like globalisation corruption has been globalised in the government machinery in this largest democracy in the world. Whether concerned public functionary will tell me the single reason for setting up the concerned wrongdoer scot-free who submitted the forged document in the name of yogi M P Singh. Who has given him so authority that he may submit an affidavit of yogi M P Singh.
Grievance Document
Current Status
Case closed
Date of Action
03/07/2020
Remarks
आख्या अपलोड है उक्त प्रकरण की जांच पूर्ति निरीक्षक द्वारा करायी गयी पूर्ति निरीक्षक की जांच आख्या अनुसार शिकायतकर्ता द्वारा खाद्य एवं रसद विभाग में भ्रष्टाचार के संबंध में शिकायत किया गया है उक्त के संबंध में अवगत कराना है कि शिकायतकर्ता के दूरभाष नम्बर 7379105911 पर दिनांक 30.06.2020 को 11बजकर 15 मिनट पर संपर्क किया गया जिसमें शिकायतकर्ता द्वारा बताया गया कि श्रीमती साधना सिंह राशनकार्ड संख्या 219940805151 में इनके पति श्री अरूण प्रताप सिंह का नाम कट गया है जिसको पुनः जोड़ने हेतु आधार की छायाप्रति मांगी गयी परंतु उनके द्वारा उपलब्ध नहीं कराये जाने की बात कही गयी साथ ही उनके द्वारा यह भी बताया गया कि मैं बार – बार शिकायत करता रहूंगा आख्या सेवा में
Reply Document
Rating
Poor
Rating Remarks
District Supply Officer has only misled the concerned senior rank staffs as aforementioned affidavit is not the affidavit of the applicant Yogi M. P. Singh and the applicant claims that no staff of D.S.O. Mirzapur submitted forged documents before the senior rank officers so he must be subjected to scrutiny under sections 465,466,467,468,469 and 471 of I.P.C. Section 465 in The Indian Penal Code-Whoever commits forgery shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both. Section 466 in The Indian Penal Code 466. Forgery of record of Court or of public register, etc. IPC 467: Section 467 of the Indian Penal Code Forgery of valuable security, will, etc. IPC 468: Section 468 of the Indian Penal Code Forgery for purpose of cheating. Section 469 in The Indian Penal Code 469. Forgery for purpose of harming reputation. Section 471 in The Indian Penal Code 471. Using as genuine a forged document or electronic record
Officer Concerns To
Officer Name
Shri Arun Kumar Dube
Officer Designation
Joint Secretary
Contact Address
Chief Minister Secretariat U.P. Secretariat, Lucknow
Email Address
sushil7769@gmail.com
Contact Number
0522 2226349
0 0 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
6 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Vandana Singh
Vandana Singh
4 months ago
Reply to  Yogi

यह स्पष्ट है कि साधना सिंह के राशन कार्ड की आख्या पूर्ण रूप से असंगत है इसइसलिए दी. एस. ओ. मिर्जापुर की संज्ञान रिपोर्ट काफी असंगत है उपरोक्त शिकायत में भ्रामक आख्या लगाई गई है इसलिए उनके खिलाफ अनुशासनात्मक कार्रवाई की जानी चाहिए क्योंकि वह अपनी बेगुनाही साबित करने में विफल रहे है और आख्या शिकायत से संबंधित नहीं है|

Arun Pratap Singh
4 months ago

Undoubtedly people/ countrymen always prefer good governance and to please the electorates, our politicians make election rhetoric to centralise the voters but corruption is so rampant that as the elections are over they forget their election rhetoric immediately and anarchy rules us as it is. Think about the gravity of situation that forged affidavit of complainant Yogi M. P. Singh was submitted by a district level officer i.e. district supply officer to get submitted grievance disposed of.

Preeti Singh
Preeti Singh
4 months ago

District Supply Officer has only misled the concerned senior rank staffs as the aforementioned affidavit is not the affidavit of the applicant Yogi M. P. Singh and the applicant claims that no staff of D.S.O. Mirzapur submitted forged documents before the senior rank officers ever met him so he must be subjected to scrutiny under sections 465,466,467,468,469 and 471 of I.P.C.
जब जिला पूर्ति अधिकारी का कोई अधीनस्थ योगी एम्. पी. सिंह से मिला ही नही तो कैसे योगी एम्. पी. सिंह ने उस अधिकारी को हलफनामा दिया की वह जिला पूर्ति विभाग के भ्रष्टाचार से संतुष्ट है |

Bhoomika Singh
Bhoomika Singh
4 months ago

It is quite obvious that matter is concerned with the deep rooted corruption and ipso facto obvious that forgery has been committed by the concerned staff of the district Supply office district Mirzapur and its officer district supply officer remained mute spectator in the matter which is the mockery of the law of land.

Pratima Singh Parihar
Pratima Singh Parihar
4 months ago

यह सबसे आश्चर्यजनक है कि पूरे सार्वजनिक अधिकारियों को पता है कि जिला आपूर्ति अधिकारी मिर्जापुर ने उत्तर प्रदेश सरकार के जनसुनवाई पोर्टल पर योगी सिंह के नाम पर जाली रिपोर्ट प्रस्तुत की, जो भूमि के कानून का उल्लंघन है और गलत काम करने वालों को बख्शा नहीं जाना चाहिए। एक गंभीर अपराध किया है, लेकिन ऐसा लगता है कि सार्वजनिक अधिकारियों ने गलत काम करने वाले कर्मचारियों को शील्ड करने के लिए अपना मूड बना लिया है जो कि उनके गुप्त कार्य शैली से काफी स्पष्ट है। गलत तरीके से मुक्त करके, निस्संदेह हम सरकारी तंत्र में भ्रष्टाचार को बढ़ावा दे रहे हैं, लेकिन ऐसा लगता है कि वैश्वीकरण की तरह दुनिया के सबसे बड़े लोकतंत्र में भ्रष्टाचार का वैश्वीकरण हो गया है।