Whether Director Secondary Education will comply direction of High court of judicature.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

Cause List, Allahabad
02/08/2017

                    High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
                              C A U S E   L I S T
        (Published under the authority of the Hon'ble The Chief Justice)
                                     F O R
 ********************************************************************************
                            Wednesday August  2,2017



******************************************************************************
                                                       AT 10.00 A.M.
                    COURT NO.17
                    HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP KUMAR SINGH BAGHEL
Fresh and Listed; (i) Service writs relating to educational institutions from 1
-January 2016; (ii) Testamentary matters;(iii) Listed service writs (except serv
-ice writs relating employees of High Court and District Judiciary) from 1 Janua
ry 2001 to 31 December, 2010; (iv) Civil matters of all categories where High Co
-urt has granted stay of the proceedings before thetrial court for the year 2002
           – for orders, admission and hearing including bunch cases.
                                      For Admission
WRIT – A                               
   1. DF-PH 11340/2001 GIRIJA SHANKAR PANDEY & OTHERS  V.K. SHUKLA             
                                                       R.G.TRIPATHI
                       Vs. THE ASSTT. DIRECTOR OF EDU  S.C.                    
                       -CATION & OTHERS                B.P. SINGH
                                                       MOHD SHERE ALI
                                      For Admission
Senior Citizen
WRIT – A                               
   2. WA    21944/2003 SMT. DULARI DEVI AND OTHERS     M.D. MISRA              
                                                       W.H.KHAN.
                                                       N.H.KHAN
                                                       J.H.KHAN
                       Vs. UNION OF INDIA THRU’ SECY.  A.N. ROY                
                       – AND OTHERS                    B.N. SINGH
                                                       S.S.C.
                                                       R.S. MISRA
                                                       K.K.SHUKLA
                                                       K.C. SHUKLA
                                                       K.C. SINHA
                                                       A.S.G.I.
                                                       K.C. SRIVASTAVA
                                                       ARUN KUMAR
   3. NDF   54741/2005 RATAN LAL SHARMA                MANISH GOYAL            
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS    C.S.C.                  
                                                       ATUL TEJ KULSHRESTHA
                                                       ANIL BHUSHAN
   4. PO    48504/2008 RAM KUMAR TIWARI                ARUN SRIVASTAVA         
                                                       D.M.SINGH
                                                       GOPAL MISHRA
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS      C.S.C                   
                                                       J.P. PANDEY
                                                       SANDEEP KR. SRIVASTAVA.
                                                       MAHMOOD AHAMAD
                                                       BALESHWAR CHATURVEDI

  40. PO    20121/2006 RAJENDRA PRATAP SINGH          
P.C. CHAUHAN            
                                                       S.P. SINGH
                                                       P.S.CHAUHAN
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS    C.S.C. 

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION 2nd Floor, ‘B’ Wing, August Kranti Bhavan,  Bhikaji Cama Place, NEW DELHI­110 066 TEL: 011­26717355  Appeal No. CIC/CC/A/2014/001147/VS

Appellant: Shri Yogi M.P. Singh,           Mohalla­Surekapuram,     Jabalpur Road,         Distt. Mirzapur, U.P.    Respondent:                    Central Public Information Officer, Allahabad High Court,           Allahabad.                     Date of Hearing:      26.10.2015      
Date of Decision:   4.11.2015
                                 O R D E R
RTI application:
1. The appellant   filed   an   RTI   application   dated   18.3.2014   seeking   information regarding copy of counter affidavit submitted by Director Secondary Education Arth­1 Allahabad.   The PIO responded  on 27.3.2014.     The appellant filed first  appeal  dated 31.3.2014 with the first appellate authority.  The FAA responded on 5.5.2014. The appellant filed second appeal on  24.9.2014 with the Commission.
Hearing:
2.The appellant participated in the hearing through audio.   The respondent did not participate in the hearing. 
3.The appellant referred his RTI application dated 18.3.2014 and reiterated the points mentioned in the RTI  application.  The appellant stated that he wanted to know whether the Director Secondary Education has filed  counter affidavit in writ petition No. 20121 of 2006 or not.  The appellant further stated that if the Director Secondary Education has filed the counter affidavit, then  a copy of counter affidavit should be provided 


Decision:
4.The respondent is directed to provide the appellant, within 30 days of this order, information sought in the  RTI application.  The appeal is disposed of.  Copy of decision be given free of cost to the parties.
                           (Vijai Sharma)                        Chief Information Commissioner   
Authenticated true copy   
                                 (Dhirendra Kumar)            Deputy Secretary and Deputy Registrar 


4 comments on Whether Director Secondary Education will comply direction of High court of judicature.

  1. The appellant referred his RTI application dated 18.3.2014 and reiterated the points mentioned in the RTI  application.  The appellant stated that he wanted to know whether the Director Secondary Education has filed  counter affidavit in writ petition No. 20121 of 2006 or not.  The appellant further stated that if the Director Secondary Education has filed the counter affidavit, then  a copy of counter affidavit should be provided 

  2.  17 
     9  
    Additional (Unlisted) Cause List 
      
     Case Details – WRIA /33193/2017
     Title :SACHIN KUMAR PARASHAR AND 11 OTHERS Vs. STATE OF –
              U.P. AND 5 OTHER
     Petitioner's Counsels -ANURAG SHARMA 
     Respondent's Counsel -C.S.C. 

  3. HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
    Case Status – Allahabad

    Pending
    Writ – A / 20121 / 2006 [Mirzapur]

    Petitioner: RAJENDRA PRATAP SINGH
    Respondent: STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS
    Counsel (Pet.): P.C. CHAUHAN
    Counsel (Res.): C.S.C.
    Category: Service-Writ Petitions Relating To Secondary Education (non Teaching Staff) (single Bench)-Salary And Allowances
    Date of Filing: 10/04/2006
    Next Listed on: 02/08/2017 in Court No. 17
    This is not an authentic/certified copy of the information regarding status of a case. Authentic/certified information may be obtained under Chapter VIII Rule 30 of Allahabad High Court Rules. Mistake, if any, may be brought to the notice of OSD(Judicial)(Computer).

  4. The appellant stated that he wanted to know whether the Director Secondary Education has filed counter affidavit in writ petition No. 20121 of 2006 or not. The appellant further stated that if the Director Secondary Education has filed the counter affidavit, then a copy of counter affidavit should be provided
    Why Central Public Information Officer did not provide the sought information to the information seeker is the matter of concern.

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: