Whether the death of Land Mafia blockes the path to seek justice against his atrocity of justice seeker

आवेदन
का विवरण
शिकायत
संख्या
40015719030552
आवेदक कर्ता का
नाम:
Dinesh Pratap Singh
आवेदक कर्ता का
मोबाइल न०:
9838919619,9838919619
विषय:
Matter is concerned with शिकायत संख्या-60000190041291 आवेदक कर्ता का
नाम: Yogi M. P. Singh. श्री मान जी
क्या मोदी सर के
यहा प्रस्तुत प्रकरणों पर
राज्य सरकार कोई कार्यवाही नही करती है जैसा की आपके हीला हवाली से स्वतः स्पस्ट है
| सोचिये लापरवाही की
भी एक
सीमा होती है और
आप लोग उस सीमा के परे है | यह स्पस्ट हो गया की सत्ता से जब
तक ब्यक्ति दूर रहता है जितना इमानदारी की
बात करना है कर
ले किन्तु जैसे ही
सत्ता में आता है
वह भी
उसी रास्ते पर चलने लगता जैसा की उसका पूर्ववर्ती था
| श्री मान जी
महीने भर
बाद भी
कुछ कार्यवाही नही की
गई क्या यह आराजकता का द्योतक नही है
| इमानदारी चिल्लाने में नही पर
कार्य में परिलक्षित होनी चाहिए | 01 – Apr – 2019 को अपर मुख्य सचिव/प्रमुख सचिव/सचिव गृह एवं गोपन को जनसुनवाई के माध्यम से मामला निस्तारण हेतु सौपा गया किन्तु वरिष्ठ पुलिस अधीक्षक की लापरवाही की वजह से अधर में ही
लटक गया और फीडबैक पर कोई कार्यवाही जैसे होती ही
नहीं | श्री मान जी फीडबैक पर कार्यवाही करके मामले को पुनर्जीवित करना चाहिए था क्यों की सम्बंधित रिपोर्ट में जांच अधिकारी ने खुद ही सिफारिश की है
की मामले का निस्तारण थाना आसियाना द्वारा ही
समीचीन है
| कहा है थाना आसियाना की रिपोर्ट | फीडबैक :दिनांक 09/04/2019को फीडबैक:- Sir, how the grievance
has been redressed if the investigation officer itself accepted in the report
that matter is concerned with the police station Asiyana not with the police
station Naka Hindola so it would be appropriate to transfer the matter to
police station Asiyana which comes under the ambit of office of circle
officer Cant so matter be transferred to circle officer Cantt from circle
officer Kaiser Bag. Undoubtedly the act of senior superintendent of police
Lucknow is unconstitutional and arbitrary because he did not act in
accordance with the law on the report of a concerned police officer. He had
accepted the grievance disposed of but in the report, it had been
categorically stated towards his mistake that matter concerned with ant was forwarded
by him to Kaiser Bagh. How much surprising that he did not rectify its error
but preferred to consider the grievance as disposed of which is a reflection
of the cryptic approach on the part of Senior Superintendent of Police
Lucknow.
फीडबैक की
स्थिति: फीडबैक प्राप्त But it is unfortunate that concerned did not
take any action on the feedback and deliberately procrastinating on the
matter concerned with the Land Mafia.
नियत तिथि:
08 – Jun – 2019
शिकायत की स्थिति:
निस्तारित
रिमाइंडर :
फीडबैक :
दिनांक 09/06/2019को फीडबैक:- Here matter is concerned
with the cheating and the applicant has been cheated by the corrupt coterie
so F.I.R. be lodged in the matter and loss occurred to the applicant be
compensated by those who are the heirs of the accused. Whether request to
lodge F.I.R. was made to seek justice or to get the feedback regarding the
death of offender? Here subject of enquiry is the impugned land and house
built on it and chauki/police station asiyana must disclose it that who have
grabbed the land and housed of the applicant who had the possession of the
possession of aforementioned properties from 12-Jun-1998 to sept-2009 and
left the property by putting lock in the rooms and shops as well. Most
important point to be noted is electricity bill both commercial and domestic
still issued by the department of electricity in the name of applicant. Which
are attached with the grievance –
शिकायत संख्या-60000190041291 which is also subject to
investigation of concerned police officer. It is submitted before the Hon’ble
Sir that according to section 4 (1) (d) of Right to Information Act 2005,
Every public authority shall—provide reasons for its administrative or
quasi-judicial decisions to affected persons. Hon’ble Sir please take a
glance of historic judgement delivered by apex court of India. Accountability
must be ensured in order to achieve good governance. Even in respect of
administrative orders Lord Denning M.R. in Breen v. Amalgamated Engineering
Union (1971 (1) All E.R. 1148) observed “The giving of reasons is one of
the fundamentals of good administration”. In Alexander Machinery
(Dudley) Ltd. v. Crabtree (1974 LCR 120) it was observed: “Failure to
give reasons amounts to denial of justice”. Reasons are live links
between the mind of the decision taker to the controversy in question and the
decision or conclusion arrived at”. Reasons substitute subjectivity by
objectivity. The emphasis on recording reasons is that if the decision
reveals the “inscrutable face of the sphinx”, it can, by its
silence, render it virtually impossible for the Courts to perform their
appellate function or exercise the power of judicial review in adjudging the
validity of the decision. Right to reason is an indispensable part of a sound
judicial system, reasons at least sufficient to indicate an application of
mind to the matter before Court. Another rationale is that the affected party
can know why the decision has gone against him. One of the salutary
requirements of natural justice is spelling out reasons for the order made,
in other words, a speaking out. The “inscrutable face of a sphinx”
is ordinarily incongruous with a judicial or quasi-judicial performance.
फीडबैक की स्थिति:
फीडबैक
प्राप्त

आवेदन
का संलग्नक

अग्रसारित विवरण

क्र..
सन्दर्भ
का प्रकार
आदेश
देने वाले अधिकारी
आदेश
दिनांक
अधिकारी
को प्रेषित
आदेश
आख्या
दिनांक
आख्या
स्थिति
आख्या
रिपोर्ट
1
अंतरित
ऑनलाइन
सन्दर्भ
01 – Jun – 2019
थानाध्‍यक्ष/प्रभारी नि‍रीक्षकआशियाना,जनपदलखनऊ,पुलिस
09/06/2019
श्रीमानजी उपरोक्त प्रा0 पत्र की
जांच आख्या सलग्न है
कृपया ग्रहण करने की कृपा करें।
निस्तारित

आवेदन
का विवरण
शिकायत
संख्या
60000190041291
आवेदक कर्ता का
नाम:
Yogi M. P. Singh
आवेदक कर्ता का
मोबाइल न०:
7379105911,
विषय:
Matter is concerned with Dinesh Pratap Singh S/O Late Angad Pd.
Singh Mobile number9838919619 -Address-LD/84B Sleeper Ground, Railway Colony,
Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh but presently new address-C/O K. P. Singh
Mohalla-Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road, District-Mirzapur, Uttar
Pradesh.Aggrieved Dinesh Pratap Singh S/O Late Angad Pd. Singh Mobile
number9838919619 seeks justice from the government as appropriate direction
be issued to the aforementioned respondents to be instrumental in vacating
the house and lodge F.I.R. against Land Mafias cum grabbers who are carrying
out commercial activities in the house of the applicant or take action
against the Land Maffia cum cheater Babu Singh S/O R. P. Singh
Address-1914-18 Kanpur Road scheme, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh who breached the
terms of the agreement made on 12-Jun-1998. For detail vide attached
representation.
नियत तिथि:
01 – May – 2019
शिकायत की स्थिति:
निस्तारित
रिमाइंडर :
फीडबैक :
दिनांक 09/04/2019को फीडबैक:- Sir, how the grievance
has been redressed if the investigation officer itself accepted in the report
that matter is concerned with the police station Asiana not with the police
station Naka so it would be appropriate to transfer the matter to police station
Asiana which comes under the ambit of office of circle officer Cant so matter
be transferred to circle officer Cant from circle officer Kaiser Bag.
Undoubtedly the act of senior superintendent of police Lucknow is
unconstitutional and arbitrary because he did not act in accordance with the
law on the report of a concerned police officer. He had accepted the
grievance disposed of but in the report, it had been categorically stated
towards his mistake that matter concerned with Kant was forwarded by him to
Kaiser Bagh. How much surprising that he did not rectify its error but
preferred to consider the grievance as disposed of which is a reflection of
the cryptic approach on the part of Senior Superintendent of Police Lucknow.
श्री मान जी
बिधि का
शासन सर्वोच्च होता है
और किसी भी लोकतान्त्रिक सरकार की
सर्वोच्च प्राथमिकता होती है
की वह
बिधि का
शासन स्थापित करे जिससे की मानवाधिकारों का कम
से कम
उल्लंघन हो
किन्तु यह
प्रतीत होता है की
हमारे जिम्मेदार पुलिस अधिकारी ही मानवाधिकारों का उल्लंघन करने में तुले हुए है एक
तरफ सरकार भू माफियाओं के खिलाफ कार्यवाही की
बात करती है दूसरी ओर खुद राजधानी में पोस्टेड श्री मान वरिष्ठ पुलिस अधीक्षक महोदय बिना पढ़े ही
रिपोर्ट लेकर शिकायत निस्तारित मान लेते है |श्री मान जी प्रदेश की राजधानी में उत्कृष्ट छवि वाले पुलिस अधिकारी तैनात होते है जिनका नाम सुन कर अपराधियों के मन
में सिहरन पैदा हो
जाय किन्तु इस समय तो कुछ और ही
है जिसकी पोल मीडिया खुद खोल रही है
आये दिन |श्री मान निस्संदेह मामला कैंट सर्किल के
आसियाना थाने का था
किन्तु शुरू में ये
माना जा
सकता था
श्री मान वरिष्ठ पुलिस अधीक्षक महोदय द्वारा भुलबस गलत सर्किल और थाने में भेजा गया किन्तु जांच रिपोर्ट के पश्चात् जब थाना अध्यक्ष नाका खुद कह
रहे है
की मामला कैंट सर्किल के आसियाना थाने का
है और
मामले को
कैसर बाग सर्किल से
कैंट सर्किल भेजा जाय और थाना अध्यक्ष आसियाना से मामले की जांच कराइ जाय उसके बावजूद श्री मान वरिष्ठ पुलिस अधीक्षक महोदय द्वारा शिकायत को निस्तारित मान लेना खुद में चौका देने वाला तथ्य है जो
स्वस्थ लोकतंत्र का परिचायक नही है
| श्री मान मुख्य मंत्री कार्यालय आप तो
मामले का
सूक्ष्म परिवीक्षण करते है
और बारीकी से निस्तारण का अध्ययन करते है
आप ही
बताये की
जब मामला उस बिंदु तक ही
नही पंहुचा जहा से
निस्तारण होना है तो
मामला निस्तारित कैसे हो
गया | क्या सरकार इसी तरह भू माफियाओं के खिलाफ कार्यवाही करती है |
फीडबैक की स्थिति:
फीडबैक
प्राप्त

आवेदन
का संलग्नक

अग्रसारित विवरण

क्र..
सन्दर्भ
का प्रकार
आदेश
देने वाले अधिकारी
आदेश
दिनांक
अधिकारी
को प्रेषित
आदेश
आख्या
दिनांक
आख्या
स्थिति
आख्या
रिपोर्ट
1
अंतरित
लोक शिकायत अनुभाग – 2( मुख्यमंत्री कार्यालय )
01 – Apr – 2019
अपर मुख्य सचिव/प्रमुख सचिव/सचिव गृह एवं गोपन
कृपया
शीघ्र नियमानुसार कार्यवाही किये जाने की अपेक्षा की गई है।
09/04/2019
अनुमोदित
निस्तारित
2
अंतरित
अपर मुख्य सचिव/प्रमुख सचिव/सचिव (गृह एवं गोपन )
01 – Apr – 2019
वरिष्ठ /पुलिस अधीक्षकलखनऊ,पुलिस
कृपया
प्रकरण में शीध्र यथोचित कार्यवाही करने का कष्ट करें
09/04/2019
अनुमोदित
निस्तारित
3
अंतरित
वरिष्ठ /पुलिस अधीक्षक (पुलिस )
01 – Apr – 2019
क्षेत्राधिकारीक्षेत्राधिकारी कैसरबाग
आवश्यक
कार्यवाही करने का कष्ट करें एवं आख्या प्रेषित करें
09/04/2019
kripya shikayti patra me ankit aaropon ki vistrit janch akhya
sanlagn hai.
निस्तारित

0 0 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
3 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Yogi
1 year ago

दिनांक 09/06/2019को फीडबैक:- Here matter is concerned with the cheating and the applicant has been cheated by the corrupt coterie so F.I.R. be lodged in the matter and loss occurred to the applicant be compensated by those who are the heirs of the accused. Whether request to lodge F.I.R. was made to seek justice or to get the feedback regarding the death of offender? Here subject of enquiry is the impugned land and house built on it and chauki/police station asiyana must disclose it that who have grabbed the land and housed of the applicant who had the possession of the possession of aforementioned properties from 12-Jun-1998 to sept-2009 and left the property by putting lock in the rooms and shops as well.

Beerbhadra Singh
1 year ago

Here it is crystal clear that the role of the police belonging to state capital and its accountable public functionaries is sheer negative. Think about the gravity of situation that first Senior Superintendent of Police Lucknow send the matter to those personnel who were not concerned with the matter as the matter comes under the Ambit of Ashiyana police station which comes under the the circle officer cantt not under kaiser Bagh. Here Kesar Bagh circle officer unnecessarily send the matter to the Naka hindola police station instead of taking perusal of the matter itself.

Arun Pratap Singh
1 year ago

What is the need of inviting feedback if our public public functionaries don't want to take any action on these feedback?
नियत तिथि: 01 – May – 2019 शिकायत की स्थिति: निस्तारित रिमाइंडर :
फीडबैक : दिनांक 09/04/2019को फीडबैक:- Sir, how the grievance has been redressed if the investigation officer itself accepted in the report that matter is concerned with the police station Asiana not with the police station Naka so it would be appropriate to transfer the matter to police station Asiana which comes under the ambit of office of circle officer Cant so matter be transferred to circle officer Cant from circle officer Kaiser Bag. Undoubtedly the act of senior superintendent of police Lucknow is unconstitutional and arbitrary because he did not act in accordance with the law on the report of a concerned police officer. He had accepted the grievance disposed of but in the report, it had been categorically stated towards his mistake that matter concerned with Kant was forwarded by him to Kaiser Bagh. How much surprising that he did not rectify its error but preferred to consider the grievance as disposed of which is a reflection of the cryptic approach on the part of Senior Superintendent of Police Lucknow. आप ही बताये की जब मामला उस बिंदु तक ही नही पंहुचा जहा से निस्तारण होना है तो मामला निस्तारित कैसे हो गया | क्या सरकार इसी तरह भू माफियाओं के खिलाफ कार्यवाही करती है | फीडबैक की स्थिति: फीडबैक प्राप्त