Whether corrupt staff of government submitted fake affidavit of Yogi M. P. Singh will be punished?

Diary
No.
42241/SCI/PIL(E)/2019
Application
Date
09-08-2019
Received
On
21-08-2019
Applicant
Name
YOGI
M P SINGH
Address
SUREKAPURAM
JABALPUR ROAD DIST MIRZAPUR
State
UTTAR
PRADESH
Action
Taken
UNDER
PROCESS

Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
Whether D.S.O. Mirzapur will be punished for this forgery ipso facto obvious?
1 message
Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com> 8 August 2019 at 23:39

To: pmosb <pmosb@pmo.nic.in>, presidentofindia@rb.nic.in, supremecourt <supremecourt@nic.in>, urgent-action <urgent-action@ohchr.org>, cmup <cmup@up.nic.in>, hgovup@up.nic.in, csup@up.nic.in, uphrclko <uphrclko@yahoo.co.in>

District Supply Officer has only misled the concerned senior rank staffs as aforementioned affidavit is not the affidavit of the applicant Yogi M. P. Singh and the applicant claims that no staff of the district supply office Mirzapur ever met the applicant in any matter.

With great respect to revered Sir, your applicant invites the kind attention of the Hon’ble Sir to the following submissions as follows.

1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that following grievance has been just submitted on the Jansunwai portal of the government of Uttar Pradesh. Here lacuna  on the part of the portal is that it did not take the attachment submitted with the grievance.

आवेदन का विवरण
शिकायत संख्या
40019919028800
आवेदक कर्ता का नाम:
Yogi M P Singh
आवेदक कर्ता का मोबाइल न०:
7379105911,7379105911
विषय:
आवेदन का विवरण शिकायत संख्या-40019919024704 आवेदक कर्ता का नाम:-Yogi M P Singh इस प्रकरण में जिला पुर्ति अधिकारी द्वारा जो प्रार्थी का हलफनामा प्रस्तुत किया गया है वह पूर्ण रूप से जालसाजी है क्यों की वह हलफनामा प्रार्थी का नहीं है बल्कि कूट रचना करके तैयार किया गया है | ऐसा करके जिलापूर्ति अधिकारी द्वारा महज वरिष्ठ अधिकारियों को गुमराह किया गया है | सोचिये ऐसे अधिकारी की क्या विश्वसनीयता है जो उस व्यक्ति का जाली हलफनामा लगा सकता है जिसे वह दूर तक नहीं जानता है | जिलापूर्ति अधिकारी मिर्ज़ापुर द्वारा प्रस्तुत हलफनामे का आदि से अंत तक प्रार्थी से कोई सरोकार नहीं है क्यों उनका कोई स्टाफ आज तक हमसे मिला ही नहीं | D.S.O. Mirzapur submitted forged documents before the senior rank officers so he must be subjected to scrutiny under sections 465,466,467,468,469 and 471 of I.P.C. Section 465 in The Indian Penal Code-Whoever commits forgery shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both. Section 466 in The Indian Penal Code 466. Forgery of record of Court or of public register, etc.IPC 467: Section 467 of the Indian Penal Code Forgery of valuable security, will, etc. IPC 468: Section 468 of the Indian Penal Code Forgery for purpose of cheating. Section 469 in The Indian Penal Code 469. Forgery for purpose of harming reputation.Section 471 in The Indian Penal Code 471. Using as genuine a forged document or electronic record. दिनांक 25/07/2019को फीडबैक:- श्री मान जी प्रार्थी को चल भाष संख्या ९७९३४६२४७१ से फोन किया गया तो प्रार्थी द्वारा उपलब्ध डिटेल से अवगत कराया गया किन्तु जब इक्षा शक्ति हो तब तो कार्य हो इसलिए समस्त डिटेल वेबसाइट पर हो जिससे बार बार बहाना कर सके | आज तो चार बार फोन किये रिंग गया पिक अप नहीं किये क्यों की अपने आप को जनता का नौकर समझते ही नहीं |यदि नौकर अपने आप को भूल बस मालिक समझेगा तो क्या परिणाम अनुकूल होगा | कार्ड धारक का लड़कादीनानाथ/DINANATH का आधार संख्या – 649444035029, कार्ड धारक का नातीसत्यम भारतीया का आधार संख्या – 785295102316 का नाम राशन कार्ड में सूची बद्ध करना है | पात्रता सूची का पू्र्ण विवरण 1.- डिजिटाइज्ड राशन कार्ड संख्या-219940354159, 2.-कार्ड का प्रकारपात्र गृहस्थी, 3.-दुकानदार का नामपंचू पासी, 4.-दुकान संख्या– 20690314 5.-धारक का नामश्रीमती इंद्रावाती/INDRAAVAATI, 6.- धारक के पिता/पति का नामश्री हरीश/Mr. HARISH, 7.-धारक की माता का नामश्रीमती सुगिया/SUGIYA, 8.-सदस्यों की कुल संख्या 4-सदस्यों का पू्र्ण विवरण क्रम संख्या, सदस्य का नाम, लिंग धारक से सम्बन्धपिता का नाम 1-.इंद्रावाती/INDRAAVAATI, महिला, स्वयं, जोखई लाल/JOKHAI LAAL 2.-हरीश/HARISH. पुरूष, सौहर / पति राम वली/RAM VALI 3.-गुंजन/GUNJAN, महिला, बहु, दीनानाथ/DINANATH 4.-अंजलि/ANJALI महिला बेटी हरीश/HARISH
नियत तिथि:
07 – Sep – 2019
शिकायत की स्थिति:
लम्बित
रिमाइंडर :
फीडबैक :
फीडबैक की स्थिति:
आवेदन का संलग्नक
अग्रसारित विवरण
क्र..
सन्दर्भ का प्रकार
आदेश देने वाले अधिकारी
आदेश दिनांक
अधिकारी को प्रेषित
आदेश
आख्या दिनांक
आख्या
स्थिति
आख्या रिपोर्ट
1
अंतरित
ऑनलाइन सन्दर्भ
08 – Aug – 2019
जिला पूर्ति अधिकारीमिर्ज़ापुर,खाद्य एवं रसद विभाग
अनमार्क

2-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that Section 465 in The Indian Penal Code
465. Punishment for forgery.—Whoever commits forgery shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both.
3-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that Section 466 in The Indian Penal Code 466. Forgery of record of Court or of public register, etc.—1[Whoever forges a document or an electronic record], purporting to be a record or proceed­ing of or in a Court of Justice, or a register of birth, baptism, marriage or burial, or a register kept by a public servant as such, or a certificate or document purporting to be made by a public servant in his official capacity, or an authority to institute or defend a suit, or to take any proceedings therein, or to confess judgment, or a power of attorney, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine. 1[Explanation.—For the purposes of this section, “register” includes any list, data or record of any entries maintained in the electronic form as defined in clause (r) of sub-section

4-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that IPC 467: Section 467 of the Indian Penal Code

Forgery of valuable security, will, etc.

Whoever forges a document which purports to be a valuable security or a will, or an authority to adopt a son, or which purports to give authority to any person to make or transfer any valuable security, or to receive the principal, interest or dividends thereon, or to receive or deliver any money, movable property, or valuable security, or any document purporting to be an acquittance or receipt acknowledging the payment of money, or an acquittance or receipt for the delivery of any movable property or valuable security, shall be punished with 1 *imprisonment for life, or with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine.

5-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that IPC 468: Section 468 of the Indian Penal Code

Forgery for purpose of cheating

Whoever commits forgery, intending that the document forged shall be used for the purpose of cheating, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine.

6-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that Section 469 in The Indian Penal Code

469. Forgery for purpose of harming reputation.—Whoever commits forgery, 1[intending that the document or electronic record forged] shall harm the repu­tation of any party, or knowing that it is likely to be used for that purpose, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, and shall also be liable to fine.

7-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that Section 471 in The Indian Penal Code

471. Using as genuine a forged 1[document or electronic record].—Whoever fraudulently or dishonestly uses as genuine any 1[document or electronic record] which he knows or has reason to believe to be a forged 1[document or electronic record], shall be punished in the same manner as if he had forged such 1[document or electronic record].

                          This is a humble request of your applicant to you Hon’ble Sir that It can never be justified to overlook the rights of the citizenry by delivering services in an arbitrary manner by floating all set up norms. This is sheer mismanagement which is encouraging wrongdoers to reap the benefit of loopholes in the system and depriving poor citizens of the right to justice. Therefore it is need of the hour to take concrete steps in order to curb grown anarchy in the system. For this, your applicant shall ever pray you, Hon’ble Sir.

Date-08/08/2019                                          Yours sincerely

                            Yogi M. P. Singh Mobile number-7379105911

Mohalla-Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road District-Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh, India.


2 attachments
Fake affidavit of Yogi M. P. Singh submitted by DSO.pdf
540K
Ration card.pdf
243K

3 comments on Whether corrupt staff of government submitted fake affidavit of Yogi M. P. Singh will be punished?

  1. District Supply Officer has only misled the concerned senior rank staffs as aforementioned affidavit is not the affidavit of the applicant Yogi M. P. Singh and the applicant claims that no staff of the district supply office Mirzapur ever met the applicant in any matter.

  2. Whether it is not forgery committed by the district supply officer Mirzapur by submitting the forge affidavit of the public spirited person Yogi M. P. Singh on the Jansunwai portal of the government of Uttar Pradesh.
    465. Punishment for forgery.—Whoever commits forgery shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both.

  3. There is documentary evidence against the staff of the district supply office Mirzapur but it is unfortunate no accountable public functionary is taking action against this staff of the district supply department whether it is justified why our accountable public functionaries are adapting lackadaisical approach in the matter by ignoring the explicit evidence in the matter undoubtedly such behaviour of the public functionaries are only showing the rampant Tyranny and dictatorship in the government machinery such activities must not be promoted by our accountable public functionaries by adopting lackadaisical approach. Undoubtedly the act of the staff of the Civil supplies department at the district level is deplorables and our accountable public functional must take it seriously but it seems that they are colluding with the corrupt department and staffs of the government.

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: