Whether central ministry may give itself clean chit in the name of state government

Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
Whether central ministry may give itself clean chit in the name of state government in the matter concerned with serious allegations of corruption. This is only model not entire statistics of corruption.
1 message
Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com> 27 July 2017 at 09:34

To: Anjali Anand Srivastava <secy-cic@nic.in>, kapoor.singh@nic.in, pmosb <pmosb@pmo.nic.in>, supremecourt <supremecourt@nic.in>, urgent-action <urgent-action@ohchr.org>, presidentofindia@rb.nic.in, cmup <cmup@up.nic.in>, “csup@up.nic.in” <csup@up.nic.in>, hgovup@up.nic.in, “sec. sic” <sec.sic@up.nic.in>

An appeal under subsection 3 of section 19 of Right to Information Act 2005 being filed before as follows-
To
                             Chief information commissioner of India
                                   The Central Information Commission
                                               August Kranti Bhawan,
                                                    Bhikaji Cama Place,
                                                    New Delhi – 110066
Appellant-Yogi M. P. Singh S/O Rajendra Pratap Singh
Mohalla –Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road
District-Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh, India .
Respondents-1-P.K. Singh, under secretary to the government of India, central public information officer.
2- First Appellate Authority Details :-Anant PrakashPandey, director to the government of India, First Appellate Authority.
Prayer-CPIO may be directed to provide sought information as matter is concerned with the siphoning of public fund by the staffs meant to weaker section. Those violated the provisions of Right to Information Act 2005 may be subjected to scrutiny under section 20 of Right to Information Act 2005.
Most revered Sir –Your applicant invites the kind attention of Hon’ble Sir with due respect to following submissions as follows.
1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that
Enter Registration Number
MORLD/R/2017/50287
Name
Yogi M P Singh
Date of filing
17/03/2017
Public Authority
Ministry of Rural Development
Status
REQUEST DISPOSED OF
Date of action
12/04/2017
Reply :- Sir,
The Rural Housing Division, Dept./Ministry of Rural Development is implementing Rural Housing Scheme in the country. In view of Govt. commitment to provide Housing for All the erstwhile RH scheme IAY has been restructured into PMAY-G with the approval of Union Govt. and the new scheme came into effect w.e.f. 01st April 2016. The State Govt. is the implementing agency in respect of PMAY-G and the assistance under the scheme is transferred to State nodal account for the further release to the beneficiaries. As such the issues relating to corruption and irregularities are dealt with by the State Govt. However, Framework for Implementation of PMAY-G is available at www.pmayg.nic.in and you may go through it. You may also visit awaassoft.nic.in website for details of funds released and beneficiaries etc.
Accordingly, your RTI application has been forwarded to the State Govt. of Uttar Pradesh vide letter No. K-11018/01/2017-RH dated 10th April 2017 to take necessary action in the matter and copy of the same has been endorsed to you also. You may directly approach the State Govt. concerned for the requisite information.
CPIO Details :-
M Rama Krishna
Phone:
First Appellate Authority Details :-
Rekha Chauhan
Phone: 24360565
Nodal Officer Details :-
Telephone Number
23387591
Email Id
2-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that
Enter Registration Number
MORLD/A/2017/60058
Name
Yogi M P Singh
Date of filing
16/04/2017
Public Authority
Ministry of Rural Development
Status
APPEAL FORWARDED TO CONCERNED FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY
Date of action
25/05/2017
Appellate Authority Details :- Telephone Number:- , Email Id:-
Nodal Officer Details :-
Telephone Number
23387591
Email Id
3-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that following submissions were made before the First Appellate Authority but he didn’t consider it positively.
An appeal under subsection 1 of section 19 of Right to Information Act 2005.  Subject-Denial of sought information by the concerned CPIO in R.T.I. Application registered as MORLD/R/2017/50287 filed on 17/03/2017.
Accordingly, your RTI application has been forwarded to the State Govt. of Uttar Pradesh vide letter No. K-11018/01/2017-RH dated 10th April 2017 to take necessary action in the matter and copy of the same has been endorsed to you also.
Whether information seeker doesn’t know this fact that central sponsored scheme is being implemented by state government but who is monitoring this scheme?
Whether accountability of central staffs can be overlooked in the name of state government is implementing agency. In order to give clean chit to its department how cunningly CPIO included those paragraphs which were not concerned with the sought information.
Form this cryptic reply one thing is clear that once central government provided the public fund to state implementing agency, then its entire responsibilities are over. Whether the staffs of state government are looting this fund or properly using this fund is not subjected to scrutiny of department of central government.
Whether to curb siphoning of public fund meant to weaker and downtrodden section in central sponsored scheme are not the responsibilities of central government as state government with its department is implementing agency.
Please take a model of corruption in the state by taking perusal of attached documents in which report of enquiry carried out by joint team of two district level officers is contained. Even after two years, no recovery was made by D.M. Mirzapur from bunglers moreover your appellant knocked almost every door in order to be instrumental to provide justice to weaker section.
    THEY MUST PROVIDE THE SOGHT INFORMATION AS SOUGHT BY YOUR APPELLANT. POINT WISE TO THE POINT BE MADE AVAILABLE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAW.
Central public information officer of ministry of Rural (Housing Division ) development may be directed to provide following information under subsection 1 of section 6 of Right to Information Act 2005 within stipulated time as prescribed under subsection 1 of section 7 of right to Information Act 2005,
Sought Information 1 –Please made available details in regard to precautions taken by the central ministry in order to curb irregularities and ensure proper implementation of scheme like Indira Avas and others so that siphoning of public fund may be curbed effectively.
Sought Information 2 –Please made available details under which circumstances, government allows multiple unique identities for a citizenry so that its staffs may siphon public fund without informing citizenry concerned as being done quite obvious from attached documents.
Sought Information 3 –Please made available details of rules and regulations which prohibit central staffs or responsible public functionaries of central ministry ensure proper implementation public fund provided by the central government to state government. In case of attached matter no action taken by central ministry. 
Sought Information 4 – Please made available details of provision made by government which allows multiple Indira Avases to single beneficiaries ipso facto obvious from attached documents with R.T.I. Communication.
Sought Information 5 –Please made available details of action if B.D.O. says that such entries are consequent of mistake concerned staffs and same staffs has been scolded /reprimanded but latter he himself pursues same path and inspected those imaginary made Indira Avases and issued rest of fund.
4-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that from the following submissions it is quite obvious that concerned government of Uttar Pradesh doesn’t want to provide sought information because they are sunk in the ocean of corruption from top to bottom. Now it is responsibilities of central ministry to ensure proper implementation of its fund provided to state government.
stated that matter is concerned with ttate.
Important according to our magic sauce.Click to teach Gmail that this conversation is not important.
29 May
to cmup, hgovup, csup, urgent-action
Subject-In regard to compliance of communication dated 08-May-2017 of commissioner, rural development, Uttar Pradesh addressed to chief development officer, Mirzapur.
Most revered Sir –Your applicant invites the kind attention of Hon’ble Sir with due respect to following submissions as follows.
1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that please take a glance of letter No.K-11018/01/2017-RH , Government of India ,Ministry of rural development(Rural housing division) dated-10th-April-2017 addressed to your applicant. According to central government, corruption and irregularities are dealt by government of Uttar Pradesh so your R.T.I. communiqué is being forwarded to state government concerned.  Hon’ble Sir may be pleased to take a glance of first page of attached documents.
2-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that please take a glance of letter No.K-11018/01/2017-RH , Government of India ,Ministry of rural development(Rural housing division) dated-10th-April-2017 addressed to PIO , Department of rural development and Panchayati Raj, state government of Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow. R.T.I. communiqué was despatched /transferred to aforesaid public authority under subsection 3 of section 6 of Right to Information Act 2005. Hon’ble Sir may be pleased to take a glance of second page of attached documents.
3-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that Hon’ble Sir may be pleased to take a glance of communication dated 08-May-2017 of commissioner, rural development, Uttar Pradesh addressed to chief development officer, Mirzapur attached as third page of attached PDF documents with this representation. It is most unfortunate that C.D.O. Mirzapur instead of taking any concrete action only procrastinating in the matter.
                   This is humble request of your applicant to you Hon’ble Sir that how can it be justified to withhold public services arbitrarily and promote anarchy, lawlessness and chaos in arbitrary manner by making mockery of law of land? There is need of hour to take harsh steps against wrongdoer in order to win the confidence of citizenry and strengthen the democratic values for healthy and prosperous democracy. For this your applicant shall ever pray you Hon’ble Sir.
                                                         Yours sincerely
                                              Yogi M. P. Singh, Mobile number-7379105911, Mohalla- Surekapuram , Jabalpur Road, District-Mirzapur , Uttar Pradesh. Pin code-231001.
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
Attachments area
Reply
Reply to all
Forward
Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
23 Jun
to cmup, hgovup, csup, urgent-action
Subject-Huge siphoning of public fund but neither central government nor state government interested to take action against wrongdoers because they don’t want to demoralize such elements.
 Most revered Sir –Your applicant invites the kind attention of Hon’ble Sir with due respect to following submissions as follows.
1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that your applicant sought following information from central ministry under following points as follows- Central public information officer of ministry of Urban development may be directed to provide following information under subsection 1 of section 6 of Right to Information Act 2005 within stipulated time as prescribed under subsection 1 of section 7 of right to Information Act 2005,
Sought Information 1 –Please made available details in regard to precautions taken by the central ministry in order to curb irregularities and ensure proper implementation of scheme like Indira Avas and others so that siphoning of public fund may be curbed effectively.
Sought Information 2 –Please made available details under which circumstances, government allows multiple unique identities for a citizenry so that its staffs may siphon public fund without informing citizenry concerned as being done quite obvious from attached documents.
Sought Information 3 –Please made available details of rules and regulations which prohibit central staffs or public functionaries accountable of central ministry ensure proper implementation public fund provided by the central government to state government. In case of attached matter no action taken by central ministry. 
Sought Information 4 –Please made available details of provision made by government which allows multiple Indira Avases to single beneficiaries ipso facto obvious from attached documents with R.T.I. Communication.
Sought Information 5 –Please made available details of action if B.D.O. says that such entries are consequent of mistake concerned staffs and same staffs has been scolded /reprimanded but latter he himself pursues same path and inspected those imaginary made Indira Avases and issued rest of fund.
2-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that I have already apprised you, Hon’ble Sir in regard to communications made by central government staffs and state government staffs in regard to aforementioned matter concerned with serious allegations of corruption. Please take a perusal of attached documents with this representation.
3- It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that more appendage like order dated 21 May 2017 of the first appellate authority of central government and letter of project director Mirzapur dated 23 May 2017 addressed to B.D.O. Chhanbey Mirzapur is annexed with this representation. It is most unfortunate that the manners in which concerned are overlooking the matter of deep corruption is the reflection of 100 percent tolerance to corruption by public functionaries.                                  
This is a humble request of your applicant to you Hon’ble Sir that how can it be justified to withhold public services arbitrarily and promote anarchy, lawlessness and chaos in an arbitrary manner by making the mockery of law of land? There is need of hour to take harsh steps against the wrongdoer in order to win the confidence of citizenry and strengthen the democratic values for healthy and prosperous democracy. For this, your applicant shall ever pray you, Hon’ble Sir.                                                          Yours sincerely
                                              Yogi M. P. Singh, Mobile number-7379105911, Mohalla- Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road, District-Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh, Pin code-231001.
5-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that it is too much surprising that on one side of screen central ministry claiming three websites launched in order to promote transparency and accountability but on other side of screen bogus feedings on such websites is being overlooked in the cryptic manners.Important according to our magic sauce.Click to teach Gmail that this conversation is not important.
This is humble request of your applicant to you Hon’ble Sir that It can never be justified to overlook the rights of citizenry by delivering services in arbitrary manner by floating all set up norms. This is sheer mismanagement which is encouraging wrongdoers to reap benefit of loopholes in system and depriving poor citizens from right to justice. Therefore it is need of hour to take concrete steps in order to curb grown anarchy in the system. For this your applicant shall ever pray you Hon’ble Sir.
                                          Yours sincerely
                            Yogi M. P. Singh Mobile number-7379105911
Mohalla-Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road District-Mirzapur , Uttar Pradesh ,India.


8 attachments
Mockery of Right to Information Act 2005 by ministry of rural development.pdf
711K
Beneficiary Details Mata Prasad-1.pdf
300K
Beneficiary Details Mata prasad-2.pdf
290K
Beneficiary Details Shivraj Yadav second Indira Avas.pdf
288K
Beneficiary Details Shivraj Yadav.pdf
299K
Beneficiary Details sommari-1.pdf
282K
Beneficiary Details Sommari-2.pdf
297K
Beneficiary Details Sommari-3.pdf
298K

2 comments on Whether central ministry may give itself clean chit in the name of state government

  1. The Rural Housing Division, Dept./Ministry of Rural Development is implementing Rural Housing Scheme in the country. In view of Govt. commitment to provide Housing for All the erstwhile RH scheme IAY has been restructured into PMAY-G with the approval of Union Govt. and the new scheme came into effect w.e.f. 01st April 2016. The State Govt. is the implementing agency in respect of PMAY-G and the assistance under the scheme is transferred to State nodal account for the further release to the beneficiaries. As such the issues relating to corruption and irregularities are dealt with by the State Govt. However, Framework for Implementation of PMAY-G is available at http://www.pmayg.nic.in and you may go through it. You may also visit awaassoft.nic.in website for details of funds released and beneficiaries etc.

  2. Central public information officer of ministry of Urban development may be directed to provide following information under subsection 1 of section 6 of Right to Information Act 2005 within stipulated time as prescribed under subsection 1 of section 7 of right to Information Act 2005,
    Sought Information 1 –Please made available details in regard to precautions taken by the central ministry in order to curb irregularities and ensure proper implementation of scheme like Indira Avas and others so that siphoning of public fund may be curbed effectively.
    Sought Information 2 –Please made available details under which circumstances, government allows multiple unique identities for a citizenry so that its staffs may siphon public fund without informing citizenry concerned as being done quite obvious from attached documents.
    Sought Information 3 –Please made available details of rules and regulations which prohibit central staffs or public functionaries accountable of central ministry ensure proper implementation public fund provided by the central government to state government. In case of attached matter no action taken by central ministry.
    Sought Information 4 –Please made available details of provision made by government which allows multiple Indira Avases to single beneficiaries ipso facto obvious from attached documents with R.T.I. Communication.
    Sought Information 5 –Please made available details of action if B.D.O. says that such entries are consequent of mistake concerned staffs and same staffs has been scolded /reprimanded but latter he himself pursues same path and inspected those imaginary made Indira Avases and issued rest of fund.

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: