Whether the atrocity on a widow can be tolerated in this largest democracy in the world?

Whether the atrocity on a widow can be tolerated in this largest democracy in the world? Why the concerned accountable public functionaries are tolerating the wrongdoers?
Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
How the human rights are protected in this largest democracy in the world where widow of 64 years old is deprived of the pension of her husband arbitrarily?
Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com> 16 February 2019 at 15:10
To: acc.upbh@epfindia.gov.in, pmosb <pmosb@pmo.nic.in>, ro.varanasi@epfindia.gov.in, supremecourt <supremecourt@nic.in>, presidentofindia@rb.nic.in, cmup <cmup@up.nic.in>, hgovup@up.nic.in, urgent-action <urgent-action@ohchr.org>

श्री मान जी प्रस्तुत इ-मेल पर आप लोगो ने कोई कार्यवाही नही की क्या यही लोकतंत्र है जहा लोकसेवक राजा से भी ज्यादा निरंकुश होता है यह अत्याचार की पराकाष्ठा है |

Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>

Attachments23 Jan 2019, 12:47

to acc.upbhpmosbro.varanasisupremecourtpresidentofindiacmuphgovupurgent-action

A representation under Article 51 A of the constitution of India.
Whether procrastination on the application of pension of the aggrieved widow by the concerned staffs can be allowed as being done by the staffs of the concerned public authority? 
In the communication of public authority A/C No. of aggrieved lady is 35838162874 but actual account number-35838262874 and if A/C no. will be wrong how transaction will reach to its destination. Vide attached documents.
Whether it is not reflection of the insolence that concerned staffs still playing tricky game in issuing pension to the bereaved lady of departed employee? Undoubtedly matter is in the cognizance of the senior rank staffs of the department but still manipulation with the account number is the matter of the great concern.
Whether more than two years delay was not sufficient and did not provide the contentment to the staffs of the public authority otherwise why they again indulged in the same manner as being done earlier?
Justice delayed is justice denied but who cares so in this anarchy. Whether accountability will be fixed of the staff who assured to pay the pension in the month Dec-2018 with arrears but deliberately manipulated the account number of the aggrieved lady to deprive her of the legitimate rights?

On Mon, 12 Nov 2018 at 22:50, Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com> wrote:

An application under article 51 A of the constitution of India in order to seek justice for a senior woman citizen belonging to weaker and downtrodden section.
To
                Hon’ble chief justice of India
                Supreme court of India New Delhi
Subject-Concerned public authority Employees Provident Fund Organization may be directed to provide the pension of the revered old lady without any delay and more procrastination.
Matter of fact is as follows- Prabhavati Devi W/O Ram Nath Village-Adampur Post-Nibi Gaharwar, Police station-Vindhyachal, District-Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh and PIN Code-231303 is now the widow of Late Ram Nath but EPFO is seeking details from Rama Devi W/O Ram Nath Village-Adampur Post-Nibi Gaharwar, Police station-Vindhyachal, District-Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh and PIN Code-231303 ipso facto obvious from the first page of the attached documents. How can vulnerable old lady provide the documents in the name of Rama Devi consequently they arbitrarily withheld the pension being provided for living being of the family? Consequently, poor lady has been sick and the family is on the verge of hunger. Whether justice is available to this poor old lady in this largest democracy in the world?
With due respect, your applicant wants to draw the kind attention of the Hon’ble Sir to the following submissions as follows.
1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that please take a glance at the detail of the Late Ram Nath Village-Adampur Post-Nibi Gaharwar, Police station-Vindhyachal, District-Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh and PIN Code-231303 as follows-
 Details as per Bank A/c No.
PPO No.
Member ID
Pensioner’s Name
Pension Type
UPVNS00012673
UPKNP00011480000005219
RAM NATH
SUPERANNUATION
PPO No.
:
UPVNS00012673
Pensioners’ Name
:
RAM NATH
Date of Birth
:
xx-xxx-1951
Pension Type
:
SUPERANNUATION
The pension has been credited up to DECEMBER ‘2016.
Please submit digital life certificate either through UMANG mobile app/Common Service Center/EPFO field Office/Bank.
You may also submit a physical life certificate if you have submitted the Digital Life Certificate in previous years.
Your pension has been stopped due to Bank account number problem. To restart your pension contact your concerned EPFO field office.
Monthly Pension will be resumed on receipt of life certificate either digitally or manually.
2-It is to be submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that second and third page of the attached PDF document is the bank details of the departed Ram Nath in which balance amount is Rs.11685.69  but can’t be withdrawn by the vulnerable lady as cunning trick has been played by the concerned. One day old lady will also be departed from this mortal world with the desire that one day she will get the pension of her husband.
3-It is to be submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that third, fourth and fifth page of the attached document is the Aadhar Card and Bank pass book issued by the state bank of India. Aadhar Card number of the aggrieved lady is 918182146159 which can be easily perused by the concerned accountable public functionaries. If the name of the wife of late Ram Nath is Prabhavati Devi, not Rama Devi as mentioned by the concerned staff of the government, then how the aggrieved may change her name as sought by the staff of the government.
4-It is to be submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that when there are no other claimants of the pension of the late Ram Nath then why concerned public functionaries are playing the cunning game of changing the name of the wife of the late pensioner and itself playing the game of stumbling block. Whether it is not a conspiracy to deprive the vulnerable old lady of her constitutional and human rights? Where is the social justice in this society and rights of women and children? 
           This is a humble request of your applicant to you Hon’ble Sir that how can it be justified to withhold public services arbitrarily and promote anarchy, lawlessness and chaos in an arbitrary manner by making the mockery of law of land? There is need of the hour to take harsh steps against the wrongdoer in order to win the confidence of citizenry and strengthen the democratic values for healthy and prosperous democracy. For this, your applicant shall ever pray you, Hon’ble Sir.                                                          Yours sincerely
Date-1211-2018              Yogi M. P. Singh, Mobile number-7379105911, 9794103433

 , 9336252631,

 Mohalla- Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road, District-Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh, Pin code-231001.


                 


Pension of Prabhavati Devi.pdf
910K
0 0 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
3 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh

A representation under Article 51 A of the constitution of India.
Whether procrastination on the application of pension of the aggrieved widow by the concerned staffs can be allowed as being done by the staffs of the concerned public authority?
In the communication of public authority A/C No. of aggrieved lady is 35838162874 but actual account number-35838262874 and if A/C no. will be wrong how transaction will reach to its destination. Vide attached documents.

Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M. P. Singh

Undoubtedly there is rampant corruption in the government machinery but it is unfortunate that our responsible public functionaries are not taking any concrete action in order to correct the corruption from the government machinery because most of the political Masters and senior bureaucrats are also indulged in the corrupt activities to increase the back door income other than the emoluments of the salary provided by the government which is sheer unconstitutional. Think about the gravity of situation that concerned widow was not provided half of the pension of her husband because of the rampant corruption in the office of public authority and when representation was made by a public spirited person then they take action. Most surprising thing was that they also procrastinated in the matter even after the representation of public spirited person which was an impatient action on the part of them.

Arun Pratap Singh
1 year ago

Whether more than two years delay was not sufficient and did not provide the contentment to the staffs of the public authority otherwise why they again indulged in the same manner as being done earlier?
Justice delayed is justice denied but who cares so in this anarchy. Whether accountability will be fixed of the staff who assured to pay the pension in the month Dec-2018 with arrears but deliberately manipulated the account number of the aggrieved lady to deprive her of the legitimate rights?