Whether arbitrariness in listing of cases in High court may be allowed? Accountability may be fixed

 on 25/11/2016 Listed service writs(except service writs relating employees
- of High Court and District Judiciary) from 1 January 2001 to 31 December, 2010
            for orders, admission and hearing including bunch cases.
 Wednesday August  2,2017
********************************************************************************
                                                       AT 10.00 A.M.
                    COURT NO.59
                    HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHWANT VARMA
 Fresh and listed; (i) Service writs relating to local bodies including corporati
 -ons and co-operative Societies from1 January 2016;(ii) Listed Service writs (ex
-cept service writs relating employees of High Court and District Judiciary) 
up to 31 December 2000;


Case Status - Allahabad
Pending
Writ - A / 20121 / 2006 [Mirzapur]
Petitioner:
RAJENDRA PRATAP SINGH
Respondent:
STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS
Counsel (Pet.):
P.C. CHAUHAN
Counsel (Res.):
C.S.C.
Category:
Service-Writ Petitions Relating To Secondary Education (non Teaching Staff) (single Bench)-Salary And Allowances
Date of Filing:
10/04/2006
Last Listed on:
25/11/2016 in Court No. 1
Next Listing Date:
To be listed on 02/08/2017
This is not an authentic/certified copy of the information regarding status of a case. Authentic/certified information may be obtained under Chapter VIII Rule 30 of Allahabad High Court Rules. Mistake, if any, may be brought to the notice of OSD(Judicial)(Computer).

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
                              C A U S E   L I S T
        (Published under the authority of the Hon'ble The Chief Justice)
                                     F O R
 ********************************************************************************
                            Wednesday August  2,2017

********************************************************************************
                                                       AT 10.00 A.M.
                    COURT NO.59
                    HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHWANT VARMA
 Fresh and listed; (i) Service writs relating to local bodies including corporati
 -ons and co-operative Societies from1 January 2016;(ii) Listed Service writs (ex
-cept service writs relating employees of High Court and District Judiciary) upt
 o 31 December 2000; (iii) Civil matters of all categories where High Court has g
 -ranted stay of the proceedings before the trial court from the year 2012 onwards
           - for orders, admission and hearing including bunch cases.
                                      For Admission
 Senior Citizen

An appeal under subsection 3  of section of section 19 of Right to Information Act 2005.
To
                                                          Hon'ble chief information commissioner of India
                                                           
                                             The Central Information Commission.
                                                                Second Floor. ‘B Wing,
                                                                August Kranti Bhawan,
                                                                     Bhikaji Cama Place,
                                                                      New Delhi - 110066
Appellant-Mahesh Pratap Singh (Yogi M. P. Singh)
Mohalla-Surekapuram ,Jabalpur Road
District-Mirzapur ,State-Uttar Pradesh , Country-India
                              Versus
Respondents-
1-Registrar (A/C & Exam)/I/C Central Public Information Officer , High court of judicature at Allahabad , Allahabad .
2-Registrar General /First Appellate Authority under Right to Information Act 2005 ,High court of judicature at Allahabad , Allahabad .
Prayer-Information sought by your appellant through R.T.I. communiqué dated-27-11-2016 was not made available by  CPIO/ Registrar (Accounts) High Court OF judicature at Allahabad Mob. Number-8004904900.
With due respect your applicant wants to draw the kind attention of the Hon'ble Sir to the following submissions as follows.
1-It is submitted before the Hon'ble Sir that your appellant through R.T.I. communiqué dated-27-11-2016 sought following point wise information.
Hon’ble Sir, AT 10.00 A.M. date:
                    COURT NO. 1
                    HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SINHA
 Fresh and listed: (i) Service writs relating to educational institutions from 1
 -January 2016; (ii) Listed service writs(except service writs relating employees
- of High Court and District Judiciary) from 1 January 2001 to 31 December, 2010
            for orders, admission and hearing including bunch cases.
                                      For Admission
                             Please provide information point wise as sought by your applicant in regard to following points.
1-Please made available number of cases listed by Registry of High court Allahabad for hearing on 25/11/2016 in Court No. 1 in the High Court of judicature at Allahabad.
2-Please made available number of cases heard by Hon’ble aforesaid court out of aforementioned sought listed cases.
3-Please made available the name and designation of public servant under whose supervision aforementioned sought listed cases were listed for hearing on 25/11/2016 in Court No. 1 in the High Court of judicature at Allahabad.
4-Please made available the basic criteria to list a case before Hon’ble court by the registry of High court of judicature at Allahabad.
5-Please made available the fate of non heard cases by the court in regard to their processing for next listing by the registry of High Court of judicature at Allahabad.
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION 2nd Floor, ‘B’ Wing, August Kranti Bhavan,  Bhikaji Cama Place, NEW DELHI­110 066 TEL: 011­26717355  Appeal No. CIC/CC/A/2014/001147/VS
Appellant: Shri Yogi M.P. Singh,           Mohalla­Surekapuram,     Jabalpur Road,         Distt. Mirzapur, U.P.    Respondent:                    Central Public Information Officer, Allahabad High Court,           Allahabad.                     Date of Hearing:      26.10.2015      
Date of Decision:   4.11.2015
                                 O R D E R
RTI application:
1. The appellant   filed   an   RTI   application   dated   18.3.2014   seeking   information regarding copy of counter affidavit submitted by Director Secondary Education Arth­1 Allahabad.   The PIO responded  on 27.3.2014.     The appellant filed first  appeal  dated 31.3.2014 with the first appellate authority.  The FAA responded on 5.5.2014. The appellant filed second appeal on  24.9.2014 with the Commission.
Hearing:
2.The appellant participated in the hearing through audio.   The respondent did not participate in the hearing. 
3.The appellant referred his RTI application dated 18.3.2014 and reiterated the points mentioned in the RTI  application.  The appellant stated that he wanted to know whether the Director Secondary Education has filed  counter affidavit in writ petition No. 20121 of 2006 or not.  The appellant further stated that if the Director Secondary Education has filed the counter affidavit, then  a copy of counter affidavit should be provided 
Decision:
4.The respondent is directed to provide the appellant, within 30 days of this order, information sought in the  RTI application.  The appeal is disposed of.  Copy of decision be given free of cost to the parties.
                           (Vijai Sharma)                        Chief Information Commissioner   
Authenticated true copy   
                                 (Dhirendra Kumar)            Deputy Secretary and Deputy Registrar  
2-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that Whether independence of judiciary means tyranny and lack of transparency and accountability if not so then why public authority High court of judicature at Allahabad took under teeth the order passed by constitutional functionary central information commission. In ancient India ,Kings used to hang bell at the door of palace so that no justice seeker may be deprived from right to justice but here no justice is available to common citizenry unto death. It seems that honesty has been out of context otherwise no such serious issues concerned with mockery of provisions of constitution may arise before us.
3-It is submitted before the Hon'ble Sir that repeated representations made before the CPIO ,High court of judicature at Allahabad by your applicant but aforesaid direction passed by Hon'ble chief information commissioner of India on 04/11/2015 was not complied by central public information officer of High court of Judicature at Allahabad. Whether it is justified on the part of public authority ,High court of judicature at Allahabad. Hon'ble Sir may be pleased to take a glance of attached documents with this representation.
4-It is submitted before the Hon'ble Sir that whether the act of the central public information officer ,High court of judicature at Allahabad is not lowering the dignity of courts in India. Whether such act on the part CPIO is not tantamount to assault on set high standard norm ,ethical values and impeccable integrity of temple of justice. To whom CPIO wants to shield by not revealing the sought information ? In view of your applicant ,working style in judiciary must be crystal clear instead of such inscrutable  face of sphinx.

8 comments on Whether arbitrariness in listing of cases in High court may be allowed? Accountability may be fixed

  1. Whether the act of the central public information officer ,High court of judicature at Allahabad is not lowering the dignity of courts in India. Whether such act on the part CPIO is not tantamount to assault on set high standard norm ,ethical values and impeccable integrity of temple of justice. To whom CPIO wants to shield by not revealing the sought information ? In view of your applicant ,working style in judiciary must be crystal clear instead of such inscrutable face of sphinx.

  2. Case Status – Allahabad

    Pending
    Writ – A / 20121 / 2006 [Mirzapur]
     
    Petitioner:
    RAJENDRA PRATAP SINGH
    Respondent:
    STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS
    Counsel (Pet.):
    P.C. CHAUHAN
    Counsel (Res.):
    C.S.C.
    Category:
    Service-Writ Petitions Relating To Secondary Education (non Teaching Staff) (single Bench)-Salary And Allowances
    Date of Filing:
    10/04/2006
    Last Listed on:
    25/11/2016 in Court No. 1
    Next Listing Date:
    To be listed on 02/08/2017
    This is not an authentic/certified copy of the information regarding status of a case. Authentic/certified information may be obtained under Chapter VIII Rule 30 of Allahabad High Court Rules. Mistake, if any, may be brought to the notice of OSD(Judicial)(Computer).

  3.  17 
     9  
    Additional (Unlisted) Cause List 
      
     Case Details – WRIA /33193/2017
     Title :SACHIN KUMAR PARASHAR AND 11 OTHERS Vs. STATE OF –
              U.P. AND 5 OTHER
     Petitioner's Counsels -ANURAG SHARMA 
     Respondent's Counsel -C.S.C. 

  4. Undoubtedly to list huge number of cases but not hear even one of them is clear cut cheating with poor litigants. This is reflection of rampant corruption in the temple of court/justice.
    COURT NO. 1
    HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SINHA
    Fresh and listed: (i) Service writs relating to educational institutions from 1
    -January 2016; (ii) Listed service writs(except service writs relating employees
    – of High Court and District Judiciary) from 1 January 2001 to 31 December, 2010
    for orders, admission and hearing including bunch cases.
    For Admission
    Please provide information point wise as sought by your applicant in regard to following points.
    1-Please made available number of cases listed by Registry of High court Allahabad for hearing on 25/11/2016 in Court No. 1 in the High Court of judicature at Allahabad.
    2-Please made available number of cases heard by Hon’ble aforesaid court out of aforementioned sought listed cases.
    3-Please made available the name and designation of public servant under whose supervision aforementioned sought listed cases were listed for hearing on 25/11/2016 in Court No. 1 in the High Court of judicature at Allahabad.
    4-Please made available the basic criteria to list a case before Hon’ble court by the registry of High court of judicature at Allahabad.
    5-Please made available the fate of non heard cases by the court in regard to their processing for next listing by the registry of High Court of judicature at Allahabad.

  5. Here this question arises that if CPIO High court of Judicature at Allahabad was directed to provide information within 30 days, then why did CPIO disobey the order passed by chief information commissioner of India?
    The appellant referred his RTI application dated 18.3.2014 and reiterated the points mentioned in the RTI application. The appellant stated that he wanted to know whether the Director Secondary Education has filed counter affidavit in writ petition No. 20121 of 2006 or not. The appellant further stated that if the Director Secondary Education has filed the counter affidavit, then a copy of counter affidavit should be provided

  6. Where is the honesty in the dealings of the high court of judicature at Allahabad if the counter affidavit of director secondary education was not submitted. Whether influential people in this country is not keeping the directions of courts under their teeth if thought appropriate then followed otherwise overlooked and court proved impotent before such people.

  7. Because of appointment of incompetent people as judge of the various High Court is lowering the standard of judiciary in this country. Think about the gravity of situation that several Chief Justices of India accepted this fact that here judgements are sold but they did not take any solid and strong step in order to curb such practices even at the several instances of time it has been proved that there is rampant corruption in the Judiciary but no solid and strong steps are being taken to curb the corruption in judiciary. Here reader of the judicial member just seated in side of judicial member takes the bribe before the judicial member and judicial member overlooks it.

  8. If the sought information will not be provided by the Central Public Information Officer High court of Judicature at Allahabad, then anarchy will not be created. How the judiciary will check irregularities if its function itself inviting several critics.

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: