When the strikes by advocates are illegal then why judicial process, hijacked by an outfit of lawyers.


In Ex-Capt. Harish Uppal v. Union of India and Another [(2003) 2 SCC 45], the Court (C.B.) held that lawyers have no right to go on strike or give a call for boycott and even they cannot go on a token strike.Why apex court can’t ensure compliance of its own order?

Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh yogimpsingh@gmail.com

12:53 PM (0 minutes ago)

to urgent-actionpmosbsupremecourthgovupsecypgddpg2-arpgcsupcmup
With due respect your applicant wants to draw the attention of the Hon’ble Sir to the following submissions as follows.
 1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that in order pressurize accountable functionaries to restore the age old practice of morning courts ,district bar Mirzapur continued its strike on Friday 2-May-2014 . According to set up strategy ,all the advocates were made not to attend the court proceedings. Poor  litigants were forced to return home hopelessly by paying the fee of advocates and peshi. At 11 O Clock , outfit of advocates as chalked out strategy made circulation in the entire district courts in order to curb judicial proceedings if moving on in any court and keep the fellow advocates aloof from the court proceedings if because of pressure of litigants they want their job to be done. After round patrolling  of each courts ,a meeting was convened in the meeting hall in order to decide the strategy of 3-May . On 6-May ,each advocate will oppose the morning court by using black band. All the members of bar were present in the meeting. Most of the seniors don’t come to court as date is taken by their juniors.https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=423f69194e&view=att&th=145c0300afc7f345&attid=0.2&disp=safe&realattid=1467050619098365952-local1&zw
2-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that here most sufferer is the poor litigants who come from interior corners of the district  at district head quarter and pay the fee to advocates and take the next date from the courts through the advocate.
3-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that In Ex-Capt. Harish Uppal v. Union of India and Another
[(2003) 2 SCC 45], the Court (C.B.) held that lawyers have no right to go on strike or give a call for boycott and even they cannot go on a token strike.  The Court has specifically observed that for just or unjust cause, strike cannot be justified in the present-day situation. Take strike in any field, it can be easily realised that the weapon does more harm than any justice.  Sufferer is the society — public at large.
This is humble request of your applicant to you Hon’ble Sir that this illegal strike must be stopped unconditionally. No work no pay must be applied for judicial members. What is going on in district court is tantamount to anarchy must be put to rest. For this your applicant shall ever pray you Hon’ble Sir.                                           
                              Yours  sincerely.                                                                                         Yogi M. P. Singh
 Moh-Surekapuram , Jabalpur Road Dist-Mirzapur (U.P.)

2 comments on When the strikes by advocates are illegal then why judicial process, hijacked by an outfit of lawyers.

  1. In Ex-Capt. Harish Uppal v. Union of India and Another
    [(2003) 2 SCC 45], the Court (C.B.) held that lawyers have no right to go on strike or give a call for boycott and even they cannot go on a token strike. The Court has specifically observed that for just or unjust cause, strike cannot be justified in the present-day situation. Take strike in any field, it can be easily realised that the weapon does more harm than any justice. Sufferer is the society — public at large.

  2. No one can justify the strikes of advocates. When apex court itself stated in its order that even token strikes by advocates are illegal ,then how can this indefinite call of strike by advocates can be justified.

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: