Hon’ble Sir. With due respect your applicant wants to draw the kind attention of the Hon’ble Sir to the following submissions as follows.
1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that under section 4 (1)(d)
Every public authority shall—
provide reasons for its administrative or quasi-judicial decisions to affected persons.
Hon’ble Sir B.D.O. Chhanbey Bhola Nath Kannaujia and B.S.A. Mirzapur Dinesh Kumar Yadav didn’t deposit the imposed penalty as imposed under section 20 of Right to Information Act 2005 by U.P.S.I.C. . Whether wrongdoer B.D.O. will deposit Rs. 25 thousand rupees with interest and B.S.A. will deposit Rs. 50 thousand with interest as required by law to the treasury. Hon’ble Sir please take a glance of attached PDF.
2- It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that D.M. Mirzapur requested to commissioner ,Rural development ,Uttar Pradesh , Lucknow through letter 947 dated 13.01.2014 that imposed penalty may be deducted from the salary of aforesaid B.D.O. and may be deposited to treasury and be apprised to section officer PMO, under secretary CMO and personal secretary to chief secretary. Likewise D.M. Mirzapur requested to Director , Basic Education , Uttar Pradesh , Lucknow through letter 948 dated 13.01.2014 that imposed penalty may be deducted from the salary of aforesaid B.S.A. and may be deposited to treasury and be apprised to section officer PMO, under secretary CMO and personal secretary to chief secretary . Please take a glance of attached PDF. Whether complainant will not be made available sought information. In two financial years ,only three penalties have been made by UPSIC and not a coin was recovered by government functionaries still and now indirectly D.M. Mirzapur is overlooking the complainant to whom he has to furnish access to information.
3-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that section 6 of Right to Information Act 2005
Where an application is made to a public authority requesting for an information,—
which is held by another public authority; or
the subject matter of which is more closely connected with the functions of another public authority,
the public authority, to which such application is made, shall transfer the application or such part of it as may be appropriate to that other public authority and inform the applicant immediately about such transfer:
Provided that the transfer of an application pursuant to this sub-section shall be made as soon as practicable but in no case later than five days from the date of receipt of the application.
Whether D.M. Mirzapur don’t want to make available information to your applicant if yes then why? Here it is obvious that sought information is held by Commissioner ,rural development and Director ,basic education so concerned may be directed by the competent authority in order to make available the information as sought by information seeker. Please take a glance of following link-http://yogimpsingh.blogspot.com/2013/12/it-is-unfortunate-that-no-pio-is_22.html
This is humble request of your applicant to direct concerned authority to make available sought information. For this your applicant shall ever pray you Hon’ble Sir.
Yogi M. P. Singh
Mohalla-Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road, District-Mirzapur (U.P.) India.
D.M. Mirzapur cleverly overlooked the information seeker.pdf
8:08 PM (3 minutes ago)
Hi. This is the qmail-send program at mail.allahabadhighcourt.in.
I’m afraid I wasn’t able to deliver your message to the following addresses.
This is a permanent error; I’ve given up. Sorry it didn’t work out.<firstname.lastname@example.org>:
user is over quota