Thousands of consumers deprived of the subsidy by Indian Oil Corporation Limited

Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
Thousands of consumers deprived of the subsidy by Indian Oil Corporation Limited and now concerned are escaping from providing the sought information.
1 message
Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com> 27 December 2017 at 01:18
To: Anjali Anand Srivastava <secy-cic@nic.in>, pmosb <pmosb@pmo.nic.in>, supremecourt <supremecourt@nic.in>, urgent-action <urgent-action@ohchr.org>, presidentofindia@rb.nic.in, ASRIVASTAVA@indianoil.in, VERMAAVINASH@indianoil.in, sugam prasad <sugamp@indianoil.in>

An appeal under subsection 3 of section 19 of Right to Information Act 2005.
To
                                 Chief Information Commissioner of India
                               The Central Information Commission,
                                                      August Kranti Bhawan,
                                                              Bhikaji Cama Place,
                                                         New Delhi – 110066
Appellant –Yogi M. P. Singh, Mohalla-Surekapuram
Jabalpur Road, District-Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh, Pin code -231001
                                Versus
1-CPIO, AMIT SRIVASTAVA, Phone: 0522-2305724, ASRIVASTAVA@INDIANOIL.IN, Public Authority Indian Oil Corporation Limited.
2-First appellate authority, A.K. Verma, Phone: 0522-2305707, VERMAAVINASH@INDIANOIL.IN, Public Authority Indian Oil Corporation Limited.
Prayer-CPIO didn’t comply the provisions of Right to  Information Act 2005 and denied the sought information in a cryptic manner. Since the sought information was denied in willful and deliberate manner so pecuniary penalty may be sanctioned on him as prescribed under section 20 of Right to  Information Act 2005 with time-bound compliance of the order so that others may not be promoted to indulge in such unethical and illegal practice which may promote the rampant corruption in the working of public authority Indian Oil Corporation Limited. First appellate authority instead of being instrumental in providing the sought information tried to shield the illegal work of CPIO by shifting the focus on an unproductive issue so that wrongdoing of the staffs concerned may be concealed.Therefore concerned public authority may be directed to take disciplinary action against First appellate authority.
Most revered Sir –Your applicant invites the kind attention of Hon’ble Sir with due respect to following submissions as follows.
1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that an application under subsection 1 of section 19 of Right to Information Act 2005 was submitted as RTI Appeal Registration number-IOCLD/A/2017/60218, Public Authority  Indian Oil Corporation Limited (IOCL) vide details.
2-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that Whether CPIO concerned AMIT SRIVASTAVA, Phone: 0522-2305724 doesn’t understand the contents of R.T.I. Application or such cryptic denial of sought information is his well-planned strategy. Undoubtedly aforementioned CPIO doesn’t want to disclose the information ipso facto obvious from the mysterious dealings of the staffs concerned and dealing strategy of CPIO itself. Whatever supporting document is attached to the R.T.I. Application is attached to this representation for competent authorities to take perusal so that may understand that how the public authority Indian Oil Corporation Limited is concealing the sought information in order to shield wrongdoers.
3-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that  Sought information is as follows-
1-CPIO concerned may provide the name and address of consumers that are deprived of the gas subsidy in the name of Aadhaar card by taking the recourse of attached circular of the ministry of petroleum and natural gas dated- 30-Sept-2016.
2- CPIO concerned may provide the letter number and date of served individual notices to these consumers of remote villages before depriving them of the gas subsidy as required under the circular of petroleum and natural gas attached.
4-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that reply of CPIO is as follows- Such records are not maintained at our office. However individual distributor may have such details at their end. In case you want the details of specific distributor same may be provided.
You Hon’ble Sir may take a glance at contents following submissions of submitted R.T.I. Application online before the CPIO aforementioned and for evidence that supporting document is attached to this representation also. Hon’ble Sir whether the name of the specific distributor is not mentioned in the R.T.I. Application?
5-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that an application under subsection 1 of section 6 of Right to Information Act 2005 for seeking information from Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Government of India.
CPIO, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Government of India may be directed to provide the following sought information within time as prescribed under subsection 1 of section 7 of Right to Information Act 2005.
Sought information is concerned with the only single gas agency as a precedent to the public in regard to deep-rooted corruption, in Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Government of India. Name of gas agency –Vindheshwari Gas service, Bharat Ganj, Post-Rajapur, Manda, District-Allahabad, Uttar Pradesh, India. Whether aforementioned is the name of a distributor or ghost?
6-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that following appeal was submitted by your applicant yesterday i.e. on 27/09/2017. Your applicant requested CPIO may again take the perusal of supporting document. That means he may visit R.T.I. online once again and take a glance at supporting document.  
Enter Registration Number
IOCLD/A/2017/60218
Name
Yogi M P Singh
Date of filing
27/09/2017
7-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that please take a glance at the status of R.T.I.  Application online and view document is attached to this representation.
Enter Registration Number
IOCLD/R/2017/50945
Name
Yogi M P Singh
Date of filing
20/08/2017
Public Authority
Indian Oil Corporation Limited (IOCL)
Status
REQUEST DISPOSED OF
Date of action
22/09/2017
Reply:- REPLY ATTACHED
View Document
CPIO Details:-
AMIT SRIVASTAVA
Phone: 0522-2305724
First Appellate Authority Details:-
A.K. Verma
Phone: 0522-2305707
Nodal Officer Details:-
8-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that please take a glance of the status of R.T.I.  first appeal online.

Enter Registration Number
IOCLD/A/2017/60218
Name
Yogi M P Singh
Date of filing
27/09/2017
Public Authority
Indian Oil Corporation Limited (IOCL)
Status
APPEAL FORWARDED TO CONCERNED FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY
Date of action
28/09/2017
Appellate Authority Details:- Telephone Number:- 0522-2305707, Email Id:- VERMAAVINASH@INDIANOIL.IN
Nodal Officer Details:-
Telephone Number
Email Id
This is a humble request of your applicant to you Hon’ble Sir that how can it be justified to withhold public services arbitrarily and promote anarchy, lawlessness and chaos in an arbitrary manner by making the mockery of law of land? There is need of the hour to take harsh steps against the wrongdoer in order to win the confidence of citizenry and strengthen the democratic values for healthy and prosperous democracy. For this, your applicant shall ever pray you, Hon’ble Sir.                                                          Yours sincerely
Date-27/12/2017              Yogi M. P. Singh, Mobile number-7379105911, Mohalla- Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road, District-Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh, Pin code-231001.


2 attachments
CPIO IOCL attached document with RTI application .pdf
579K
Reply of CPIO IOCL.pdf
399K
0 0 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
2 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh

CPIO didn’t comply the provisions of Right to Information Act 2005 and denied the sought information in a cryptic manner. Since the sought information was denied in willful and deliberate manner so pecuniary penalty may be sanctioned on him as prescribed under section 20 of Right to Information Act 2005 with time-bound compliance of the order so that others may not be promoted to indulge in such unethical and illegal practice which may promote the rampant corruption in the working of public authority Indian Oil Corporation Limited. First appellate authority instead of being instrumental in providing the sought information tried to shield the illegal work of CPIO by shifting the focus on an unproductive issue so that wrongdoing of the staffs concerned may be concealed.Therefore concerned public authority may be directed to take disciplinary action against First appellate authority.

Preeti Singh
2 years ago

Hon’ble Sir that reply of CPIO is as follows- Such records are not maintained at our office. However individual distributor may have such details at their end. In case you want the details of specific distributor same may be provided.
You Hon’ble Sir may take a glance at contents following submissions of submitted R.T.I. Application online before the CPIO aforementioned and for evidence that supporting document is attached to this representation also. Hon’ble Sir whether the name of the specific distributor is not mentioned in the R.T.I. Application?