Think about the gravity of situation that imposed penalties on four erring PIOs couldn’t be recovered

 

 

आवेदन
का विवरण
शिकायत
संख्या
60000190047842
आवेदक कर्ता का
नाम:
Yogi M. P. Singh
आवेदक कर्ता का
मोबाइल न०:
7379105911,
विषय:
If the district magistrate Mirzapur ascertains the recovery of penalties imposed on the following erring PIOs who made the mockery of Right to Information Act 2005 by Honourable state information commission of the government of Uttar Pradesh, then it will cause a surplus of Rs.100000.00 to the public exchequer i.e. government treasury but if he shows the lackadaisical approach, then his actions will only promote the corruption
i.e. lawlessness and anarchy in the government machinery. Ipso facto obvious that District Magistrate Mirzapur is procrastinating on this serious issue of recovery since two years but more surprising is that when applicant itself is making serious efforts since last six months and matter was circulated in the entire local dailies and it was published by them but still concerned did not make serious efforts to recover the penalty from the erring public information officers. Whether it is not a mockery of the provisions of the constitution of India and failure of the democratic set up in this largest democracy in the world. Whether it is not tantamount to put into the specific august act Right to Information Act 2005 into the dustbin.
नियत तिथि:
06 – Jun – 2019
शिकायत की स्थिति:
निस्तारित
रिमाइंडर :
फीडबैक :
दिनांक 15/06/2019को फीडबैक:- श्री मान जी वर्ष तीन माह हो गए और चारो पैनल्टीज़ में एक भी नहीं वसूली गयी क्या प्रदेश की कानून ध्वस्त नहीं हो गयी है जहा देश के लोकसेवक सत्ता को आधी अधूरी सूचना दे कर सत्ता को गुमराह करने का प्रयास करे ऐसे प्रदेश और सत्ता का क्या
भविष्य है
| सिर्फ यह बताया जाय की पेनाल्टीज वसूलने ,में राज्य का कल्याण है या भिन्न भिन्न बहाने बना कर टालने में | राज्य ब्यवस्था विश्वास पर चलता है | क्या वसूली करके प्रार्थी के विश्वास को मजबूत करना चाहते है
| If the feedback is unavailable and no documentary evidence is available then how can
it be accepted verbally that order of the state information commission has been complied with by the concerned staff of the government in accordance with the law of land. Most surprising is that there are three more public information officers who were slapped pecuniary penalties by the state information commission of the government of Uttar Pradesh who are chief development officer, district development officer and Basic Shiksha Adhikari but district magistrate concealing the information in regard to recovery of
imposed penalties from these officers. Whether such practice is not cryptic and full of corruptions which is shielding the wrongdoers from the penal proceedings of the constitutional functionaries.
श्री मान जी अब आप ही बताये रिकवरी आदेश ०३ मार्च२०१७ को पास हुआ और आज तक वसूली संभव नही हो सकी अर्थात लगभग दो वर्ष बीतने को है क्या यह कार्यशैली टाल मटोल नही दर्शाता है
| श्री मान जो कार्यशैली मुख्य राजस्व अधिकारी मिर्ज़ापुर द्वारा अपनाया गया है वह सिर्फ दो
वर्ष से हो रहे टाल मटोल की दिशा में ही एक कदम है | श्री मान जी क्या मुख्य राजस्व अधिकारी मिर्ज़ापुर को इतना भी कानून का ज्ञान नही है की प्रार्थी द्वारा ही योजित शिकायत पर सम्बंधित अधिकारिओं को २५००० रुपये अर्थ दंड से दण्डित किया गया है और हमे तब तक न्याय नही प्राप्त है जब तक मुझे यह सूचित किया जाय की आदेश पत्र अमुक द्वारा माननीय आयुक्त द्वारा जारी आदेश का समादर हो गया है | और महत्वपूर्ण बात यह है की उपरोक्त अधिकारी ने कुछ किया ही नही है सिर्फ प्रार्थी की गुमराह किया जा रहा है जैसा की हमेशा से
होता आया है |श्री मान जी क्या जनसूचना अधिकार के प्रावधानों का उल्लंघन में इन
वर्षो में पर्याप्त बडोत्तरी नही हुई है क्यों की लोगो को विश्वास है की उनके ऊपर यदि दंड आरोपित भी होता है तो वसूली नही होगी |
फीडबैक की स्थिति:
फीडबैक
प्राप्त

 

आवेदन
का संलग्नक

 

अग्रसारित विवरण

 

क्र..
सन्दर्भ
का प्रकार
आदेश
देने वाले अधिकारी
आदेश
दिनांक
अधिकारी
को प्रेषित
आदेश
आख्या
दिनांक
आख्या
स्थिति
1
अंतरित
लोक शिकायत अनुभाग – 2( मुख्यमंत्री कार्यालय )
07 – May – 2019
जिलाधिकारी
मिर्ज़ापुर,
कृपया
शीघ्र नियमानुसार कार्यवाही किये जाने की अपेक्षा की गई है।
15/06/
2019
निस्तारित
2
आख्या
जिलाधिकारी ( )
07 – May – 2019
अपर जिला अधिकारी, (भू०/ रा०)-
मिर्ज़ापुर,राजस्व एवं आपदा विभाग
नियमनुसार
आवश्यक कार्यवाही करें
15/06/
2019
कृपया प्रकरण में सम्बंधित सेआख्या प्राप्त कर निस्तारण हेतु प्रेषित |……………..
निस्तारित

 


Grievance
Status for registration number: GOVUP/E/2019/07883

 

Grievance Concerns To

 

Name Of Complainant –Yogi M. P. Singh Date of Receipt –18/04/2019

 

Received By Ministry/Department –Uttar Pradesh

 

Grievance Description

 

If the district magistrate Mirzapur ascertains the
recovery of penalties imposed on the following erring PIOs who made the mockery
of Right to Information Act 2005 by Honourable state information commission of
government of Uttar Pradesh, then it will cause a surplus of Rs.100000.00 to
the public exchequer i.e. government treasury but if he shows the lackadaisical
approach, then his actions will only promote the corruption i.e. lawlessness
and anarchy in the government machinery. Ipso facto obvious that District
Magistrate Mirzapur is procrastinating on this serious issue of recovery since
two years but more surprising is that when the applicant itself is making serious
efforts for the last six months and matter were circulated in the entire local
dailies and it was published by them but still concerned did not make serious
efforts to recover the penalty from the erring public information officers.
Whether it is not a mockery of the provisions of the constitution of India and
failure of the democratic set up in this largest democracy in the world.
Whether it is not tantamount to put into the specific august act Right to
Information Act 2005 into the dustbin
.

 

Grievance Document

 

Current Status –Case closed, Date of Action –15/06/2019

 

Remarks 
 ,कृपया प्रकरण में सम्बंधित से आख्या प्राप्त कर निस्तारण हेतु प्रेषित |……………………………..

 

Reply Document  Rating

 

Rating Remarks

 

If the feedback is unavailable and no documentary evidence is available then how
can it be accepted verbally that order of the state information commission has
been complied with by the concerned staff of the government in accordance with
law of land. Most surprising is that there are three more public information
officers who were slapped pecuniary penalties by the state information
commission of the government of Uttar Pradesh who is chief development officer,
district development officer and Basic Shiksha Adhikari but district magistrate
concealing the information in regard to the recovery of imposed penalties from
these officers. Whether such practice is not cryptic and full of corruptions
which is shielding the wrongdoers from the penal proceedings of the
constitutional functionaries.

 

Officer Concerns To

 

Officer Name –Shri Arun Kumar Dube

 

Officer Designation –Joint Secretary

 

Contact Address –Chief Minister Secretariat
U.P. Secretariat, Lucknow

 

Email Address Contact Number –05222215127

 

 

0 0 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
3 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Yogi
1 year ago

If the feedback is unavailable and no documentary evidence is available then how can it be accepted verbally that order of the state information commission has been complied with by the concerned staff of the government in accordance with law of land. Most surprising is that there are three more public information officers who were slapped pecuniary penalties by the state information commission of government of Uttar Pradesh who are chief development officer, district development officer and Basic Shiksha Adhikari but district magistrate concealing the information in regard to recovery of imposed penalties from these officers. Whether such practice is not cryptic and full of corruptions which is shielding the wrongdoers from the penal proceedings of the constitutional functionaries.

Preeti Singh
1 year ago

There are four PIOs who were punished by the state information commission but feedback is regarding one public information officer.
फीडबैक :दिनांक 17/06/2019को फीडबैक:- महोदय जॉच आख्‍या संलग्‍न है अत प्रार्थनापत्र निक्षेपित करने का कष्‍ट करें
फीडबैक की स्थिति: जिलाधिकारी द्वारा दिनाक 17/06/2019 को कार्यवाही संतोषजनक श्रेणीकृत कर दी गयी है

Beerbhadra Singh
1 year ago

Undoubtedly this deepa rooted corruption has thrown out August act Right to Information act 2005 into the heap of garbage. through such tricks. If we take the context of the post, we see that matter is concerned with the recovery of the penalty from four erring Public Information officers but if we believe in the credibility of the report then still there are three erring public information officers who have to pay the imposed penalties by the state information commission.