These dishonest people neither want to protect the rights of countrymen nor supporting protection.

What the
baseless allegations are being made against Arvind Kejarival by the leaders of
the opposition parties who only looted the state . This is really a conflict
between honesty and dishonesty. All the public 
spirited individuals must come in favour of Arvind Kejarival as the need
of hour if they want tone up its campaign against corruption. Because of Arvind
Kejarival ,we can raise its voice against grown up anarchy and also against
those who are spending luxurious life at the cost of public exchequer. This is
first time in the history of this country that countrymen have got genuine and
real option against corruption. Now we countrymen should express solidarity
with this messiah who will pull out us from the hell of anarchy  created by anarchists. How much precarious
condition that all wrongs are accepted as right and countrymen are either
misled and if few are raising voice then they are tortured through misusing
powers so that other may not dare to point its finger to the wrong doings of
public functionaries.
जनता दरबार के जरिए अराजकता फैलाने के विपक्ष के आरोप पर केजरीवाल ने कहा कि अगर जनसमस्याएं सुनना अराजकता है, तो फिर लोग लोकतंत्र का मतलब ही भूल गए हैं। लोकतंत्र का मतलब लोगों की भागीदारी सुनिश्चित करना है।
अन्य मुख्यमंत्रियों द्वारा जनता दरबार लगाने के सवाल पर केजरीवाल ने कहा कि यूपी, बिहार समेत तमाम राज्यों में मुख्यमंत्री जनता दरबार लगाते हैं, लेकिन वहां ज्यादा संख्या में लोग नहीं जाते। लोगों को उन पर यकीन नहीं है। वहीं शनिवार को दिल्ली सचिवालय पर उम्मीद से दस गुना ज्यादा लोग पहुंचे।

2 comments on These dishonest people neither want to protect the rights of countrymen nor supporting protection.

  1. Hon'ble friends-Plese take a glance of order of High Court at Allahabad dated 13.4.2006 in writ no.20121 of 2006 delivered by justice Tarun Agrawala as follows- Apparently , the impugned order dated. 1.2.2006 is against the teeth of the direction given by this court in its judgement dated 16.5.2005 . Standing Counsel appearing for respondent no.1 to 4 will file counter affidavit within three weeks explaining as to what the respondent mean by the words "Sadharan Vetanman". List immediately thereafter. Sd/-Tarun Agarwala J. 13.4.2006 Respondents-1-Director secondary education Arth-1 Allahabad 2-Assistant deputy director secondary education working in the of director of secondary education .Allahabad. 3-D.D.R. Mirzapur.4-DIOS Mirzapur. 5-Committee of management R.I.C. Naugaon ,Mirzapur. Here counter affidavit was submitted on behalf of DIOS Mirzapur on behalf of respondent no.2,3,4. But main accused ie respondent no.1 who superseded the judgement of court still did not abide by the order of High Court. Hon'ble friends- Even a common man can understand that order passed in the writ no.20121 of year 2006 is against the impugned order dated 1.2.2006 passed by director education Arth Allahabad. Here this question arises that when counter affidavit was not submitted by director ,then how court will ascertain the role of director if he is found guilty of noncomplying the order whether that will require one more writ so that his accountability may be decided. Why director secondary education Arth Allahabad did not comply the direction of High court at Allahabad? DIOS Mirzapur can submit its own submissions not on behalf of respondent 2 and 3. Respondent 2 and 3 still did not submit any counter submissions. Here petioner is aggrieved with the director as he superseded the direction of High court.

  2. अन्य मुख्यमंत्रियों द्वारा जनता दरबार लगाने के सवाल पर केजरीवाल ने कहा कि यूपी, बिहार समेत तमाम राज्यों में मुख्यमंत्री जनता दरबार लगाते हैं, लेकिन वहां ज्यादा संख्या में लोग नहीं जाते। लोगों को उन पर यकीन नहीं है। वहीं शनिवार को दिल्ली सचिवालय पर उम्मीद से दस गुना ज्यादा लोग पहुंचे।

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: