The role of state bank of India is cryptic and corruption orientated.

The role of state bank of India is cryptic and corruption orientated.

  

Add star  

Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh

<yogimpsingh@gmail.com>

Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 2:35 PM
To: “presidentofindia@rb.nic.in” <presidentofindia@rb.nic.in>, pmosb <pmosb@pmo.nic.in>, urgent-action <urgent-action@ohchr.org>, supremecourt <supremecourt@nic.in>, secypg <secypg@nic.in>, “hgovup@up.nic.in” <hgovup@up.nic.in>, cmup <cmup@up.nic.in>, csup <csup@up.nic.in>
When the CRPF web site charged four  times fee from Alok Bhardwaj and two times fee from Mohammed Akaram ,then why concerned  refunded only Rs. 300.00 and when Rs.148.00 will be refunded by them.
09 August 2016
13:37
With due respect your applicant wants to draw the kind attention of the Hon’ble Sir to the following submissions as follows.
1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that Rs.48.00 commission was charged by state bank of India on failed transactions which is sheer illegal and unjustified can’t be pardoned under the law of land.
2-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that if the accountable staffs of state bank of India has fragment of honesty ,then they  must return the commission charged by them on failed transactions. But it seems that we are living in a land where ideals virtues have no place.
3-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that please take a glance of following reply of branch manager Varanasi which shows that concerned even didn’t considered  it appropriate to take the perusal of submitted grievance
FW: PENDING CPGRAM COMPLAINT OF YOGI M P SINGH NO.DEABD/E/2016/08705 DTAED 27.07.2016
    Inbox 

  
 cmadminr2.zovns@sbi.co.in
 <cmadminr2.zovns@sbi.co.in>
Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 1:56 PM
Why is this message in Spam? It’s similar to messages that were detected by our spam filters.
To: yogimpsingh@gmail.com
Cc: customer care <agmcustomer.lholuc@sbi.co.in>
Reply | Reply to all | Forward | Print | Delete | Show original
Dear Sir,
Please go through our earlier mail sent to you on the captioned subject.
In this connection, we have to advise you that the amount Rs.12/- was deducted many time is related your payment made to recruitment of DIC (Recruitment) CRPF for many candidates through INB. The commission charges recovered as per bank’s extant instruction and was debited by the centralized system.  The charges recovered from the account are genuine, hence not eligible for refund. Further, we also advised that Rs.57/- was credited in the account is interest  paid on Savings Bank Account, while you have mentioned as unauthorized debit.
                                                            Thanking you,
                                                             Yours faithfully,
                                                                CM (Adm)
                                                                     RBO-II
                                                                A O Varanasi

Pasted from <http://yogimpsingh.blogspot.in/2016/08/whether-sbi-will-charge-commission-on.html?m=1Page>

4-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that

  
 Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh
 <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 12:57 AM
To: cmadminr2.zovns@sbi.co.in
Cc: customer care <agmcustomer.lholuc@sbi.co.in>
Reply | Reply to all | Forward | Print | Delete | Show original
Hon’ble staff of state bank of India whether you don’t understand the
meaning of following transactions –
01Aug16 (01Aug2016) CREDIT REF NO IG0BWVOND0 AMT REVERSED 100.00 2,477.47
01Aug16 (01Aug2016) CREDIT REF NO IG0BWOUVQ4 AMT REVERSED 100.00 2,577.47
 01Aug16 (01Aug2016) CREDIT REF NO IG0BWOXPD4 AMT REVERSED 100.00 2,677.47
If aforesaid amount can be refunded back into account of your
applicant ,then why not commission? Commission is paid on payment not
for failed transactions.There are four failed transactions ,one still
awaits to be refunded back by CRPF. But you have not refunded the
charged commission on these failed transactions. Next thing don’t
explain credit and debit as your applicant better understands these
definitions. That Rs.56 commission on Rs.50 is the part of rampant
corruption prevailed in all branches of state bank of India which was
not replied by reserve bank of India consequently second appeal under
subsection 3 of section 19 of Right to Information act 2005 has been
filed against CPIO reserve bank of India before CIC.

Pasted from <http://yogimpsingh.blogspot.in/2016/08/whether-sbi-will-charge-commission-on.html?m=1Page>

5-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that

Registration Number : DEABD/E/2016/08705
Name Of Complainant : Yogi M P Singh
Date of Receipt : 27 Jul 2016
Received by : Department of Financial Services (Banking Division)
Forwarded to : SBI LHO LUCKNOW
Contact Address : State Bank of India,New Administrative Bldg. ,
Motimahal Marg , Hazratganj ,
Lucknow (UP)226001
Contact Number : 05222201492
Grievance Description : Sir illegally deducted amount from my account was not refunded still claiming good governance where rights of citizenry no more safe.With due respect your applicant/petitioner wants to draw the kind attention of the Hon’ble Sir to the following submissions as follows. 1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that whether fault on the part of state bank of India can be overlooked ,that it couldn’t secure the transactions of made by its consumer. 2-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that when the payment succeeded ,then more payments could not be done ,it means state bank of India didn’t take precautionary measures during the earlier payments. 3-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that here this question is important that which bank is payee and which bank is acceptor? If both collection and payment was made by state bank of India ,then state bank of India committed serious offence which couldn’t be overlooked. Gmail – My family is on the verge of hunger ,please home ministry_C.R.P.F.pdf 4-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that since the additional deducted amount from the account of your applicant was still not refunded so it is proving nefarious designs concerned public functionaries as more than two dozen letters /representations submitted by your applicant. Gmail – When State Bank of India itself accepted that there is no charges for Merchant Transaction through internet banking from State Bank of India,then who charged Rs.12 on each transaction.pdf 5-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that don’t forget state bank of India charges Rs.57 as commission for the collection of Rs.50 and regulatory authority reserve bank of India is mute spectator of anti-public /citizenry approach of state bank of India and most surprising that reserve bank of India is shielding such ulterior designs by withholding information is lowering the credibility of banking institutions in India. Now a days bank staffs are earning back door income by colluding with administrative staffs of the government of India. Hon’ble Prime Minister of India is not taking seriously such malpractices so morale of wrongdoers is quite high. In the name of taking action ,central bureau of Investigation only sends messages on the mobile numbers of private individuals . This is humble request of your appellant to you Hon’ble Sir that It can never be justified to overlook the rights of citizenry by delivering services in arbitrary manner by floating all set up norms. This is sheer mismanagement which is encouraging wrongdoers to reap benefit of loopholes in system and depriving poor citizens from right to justice. Therefore it is need of hour to take concrete steps in order to curb grown anarchy in the system. For this your appellant shall ever pray you Hon’ble Sir. ‘Yours sincerely Yogi M. P. Singh Mobile number-7379105911 Mohalla-Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road District-Mirzapur , Uttar Pradesh ,India .
Current Status : CASE CLOSED
Date of Action : 08 Aug 2016
Details : COMPLAINANT WAS ADVISED SUITABLY BY THE RM RBO THROUGH AN E-MAIL, COPY ATTACHED

Status as on 08 Aug 2016

Pasted from <http://yogimpsingh.blogspot.in/2016/08/whether-grievance-was-redressed-by-sbi.html>
This is humble request of your applicant to you Hon’ble Sir that It can never be justified to overlook  the rights of citizenry by delivering services in arbitrary manner by floating all set up norms. This is sheer mismanagement which is encouraging wrongdoers to reap benefit of loopholes in system and depriving poor citizens from right to justice. Therefore it is need of hour to take concrete steps in order to curb grown anarchy in the system. For this your applicant shall ever pray you Hon’ble Sir.
                           ‘Yours  sincerely
                            Yogi M. P. Singh Mobile number-7379105911
Mohalla-Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road District-Mirzapur , Uttar Pradesh ,India .

2 comments on The role of state bank of India is cryptic and corruption orientated.

  1. Further, we also advised that Rs.57/- was credited in the account is interest paid on Savings Bank Account, while you have mentioned as unauthorized debit.Whether the state bank staffs justified in misleading concerned and applicant itself. Here topic was concerned with Rs.56 commission charged by S.B.I. on payment of Rs.50 by State Bank of India.

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: