The giving of reasons is one of the fundamentals of good administration”

Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh
 <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
Undoubtedly Pramika can be fed at the place of Pramila by the concerned staffs by mistake but when updating request was made why concerned are procrastinating?
Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com> 11 July 2017 at 19:32
To: crmadmin Administrator <help@uidai.gov.in>

be again made is not the solution of grievance through proper redressal mechanism.
2-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that you didn’t provide the reject reason 
which is encroachment of right to reason of aggrieved as under section 4 (1) d of 
Right to Information Act 2005-It shall be obligation of every public authority to 
to provide reason of its decision to parties concerned. 
3-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that please take a glance of historic judgement 
delivered by apex court of India. Accountability must be ensured in order to achieve good 
governance.  
Even in respect of administrative orders Lord Denning M.R. in 
Breen v. Amalgamated Engineering Union (1971 (1) All E.R. 1148) observed 
“The giving of reasons is one of the fundamentals of good 
administration”. In Alexander Machinery (Dudley) Ltd. v. Crabtree (1974 
LCR 120) it was observed: “Failure to give reasons amounts to denial of 
justice”. Reasons are live links between the mind of the decision taker 
to the controversy in question and the decision or conclusion arrived 
at”. Reasons substitute subjectivity by objectivity. The emphasis on 
recording reasons is that if the decision reveals the “inscrutable face 
of the sphinx”, it can, by its silence, render it virtually impossible 
for the Courts to perform their appellate function or exercise the power 
of judicial review in adjudging the validity of the decision. Right to 
reason is an indispensable part of a sound judicial system, reasons at 
least sufficient to indicate an application of mind to the matter before 
Court. Another rationale is that the affected party can know why the 
decision has gone against him. One of the salutary requirements of 
natural justice is spelling out reasons for the order made, in other 
words, a speaking out. The “inscrutable face of a sphinx” is ordinarily 
incongruous with a judicial or quasi-judicial performance.

 This is a humble request of your applicant to you Hon’ble Sir 
that how can it be justified to withhold public services arbitrarily 
and promote anarchy, lawlessness and chaos in an arbitrary 
manner by making the mockery of law of land? There is need 
of hour to take harsh steps against the wrongdoer in order to 
win the confidence of citizenry and strengthen the democratic
 values for healthy and prosperous democracy. For this, your 
applicant shall ever pray you, Hon’ble Sir.                                                       
                                                 Yours sincerely
                Yogi M. P. Singh, Mobile number-7379105911, 
Mohalla- Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road, District-Mirzapur, 
Uttar Pradesh, Pin code-231001.

On 11 July 2017 at 15:11, crmadmin Administrator <help@uidai.gov.in> wrote:

                          

Dear Resident,

Thank you for bringing this matter to our notice.

Your case (20170711012991) has been registered with us. Please find below our response against your query:


Query 1(Subcase Id :2017071101299101)

We have checked the status of your data updation request and as per our records; your data update request has been rejected. Reject Reason:
We advise you to please apply again. Please note that update request should be supported by appropriate documents. For further details about update process you may visit our website http://resident.uidai.net.in/

We appreciate your patience and thank you for contacting us.

Jai Hind

Aadhaar Sampark Kendra
UNIQUE IDENTIFICATION AUTHORITY OF INDIA (UIDAI)

You may also visit UIDAI resident portal at “https://resident.uidai.net.in

——Orignal Message——
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 03:04 AM, <yogimpsingh@gmail.com> Wrote:
Subject: Undoubtedly Pramika can be fed at the place of Pramila by the concerned staffs by mistake but when updating request was made why concerned are procrastinating?

Subject-Incorrect feeding of name in Aadhar card number-833106006512 of Aadhar card holder as her name Pramila (प्रमीला) but in Aadhar card feeding was made Pramika (प्रमिका)incorrectly.
Most revered Sir –Your applicant invites the kind attention of Hon’ble Sir with due respect to following submissions as follows.
1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that please you may take a glance of photo identity card issued by public authority election commission of India for Pramila and application of Pramila for updating the issued Aadhar card as well as Aadhar card issued for her bearing Aadhar number 833106006512 by unique identification authority of India, Government of India attached with this representation.    
2-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that Enrolment ID 2017/79538/72872 date and time as 24/05/2017 & 12:26:16 respectively is in regard to Aadhar number 833106006512 in order to update the Aadhar card. Message displayed on the screen is as No information is available for the entered ID. During earlier communication, they had told that once the Aadhar card made no more new application for enrolment of Aadhar card is invited as at latter stage only updates are made in order to correct to errors. Please take a perusal of attached document with this representation.
3-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that message displayed on the screen as this enrolment has been rejected. Please call 1947 for more information. Undoubtedly concerned aggrieved lady wants to get updated the information fed in the Aadhar card  as earlier feedback is not correct but it is unfortunate that concerned are reluctant enough to cooperate the aggrieved lady.  
              This is a humble request of your applicant to you Hon’ble Sir that how can it be justified to withhold public services arbitrarily and promote anarchy, lawlessness and chaos in an arbitrary manner by making the mockery of law of land? There is need of hour to take harsh steps against the wrongdoer in order to win the confidence of citizenry and strengthen the democratic values for healthy and prosperous democracy. For this, your applicant shall ever pray you, Hon’ble Sir.                                                          Yours sincerely
                                              Yogi M. P. Singh, Mobile number-7379105911, Mohalla- Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road, District-Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh, Pin code-231001.
Sent from Mail for Windows 10


Pramila wife of  Rakesh for Aadhar card updation.pdf
351K

2 comments on The giving of reasons is one of the fundamentals of good administration”

  1. Hon’ble Sir that advice of updating request
    be again made is not the solution of grievance through proper redressal mechanism.Hon’ble Sir that you didn't provide the reject reason
    which is encroachment of right to reason of aggrieved as under section 4 (1) d of
    Right to Information Act 2005-It shall be obligation of every public authority to
    to provide reason of its decision to parties concerned.

  2. Hon’ble Sir that please take a glance of historic judgement
    delivered by apex court of India. Accountability must be ensured in order to achieve good
    governance.
    Even in respect of administrative orders Lord Denning M.R. in
    Breen v. Amalgamated Engineering Union (1971 (1) All E.R. 1148) observed
    "The giving of reasons is one of the fundamentals of good
    administration". In Alexander Machinery (Dudley) Ltd. v. Crabtree (1974
    LCR 120) it was observed: "Failure to give reasons amounts to denial of
    justice". Reasons are live links between the mind of the decision taker
    to the controversy in question and the decision or conclusion arrived
    at". Reasons substitute subjectivity by objectivity. The emphasis on
    recording reasons is that if the decision reveals the "inscrutable face
    of the sphinx", it can, by its silence, render it virtually impossible
    for the Courts to perform their appellate function or exercise the power
    of judicial review in adjudging the validity of the decision. Right to
    reason is an indispensable part of a sound judicial system, reasons at
    least sufficient to indicate an application of mind to the matter before
    Court. Another rationale is that the affected party can know why the
    decision has gone against him. One of the salutary requirements of
    natural justice is spelling out reasons for the order made, in other
    words, a speaking out. The "inscrutable face of a sphinx" is ordinarily
    incongruous with a judicial or quasi-judicial performance.

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: