Tamil Nadu government is not providing life saving allowance

534 Payment of Subsistence [I981 : T.N. Act 43

Allowance

THE TAMIL NADU PAYMENT OF SUBSISTENCEALLOWANCE ACT, 1981.

3. (1) An employee who is placed under suspension, during the period of such suspension, be entitled to receive payment from the employer as subsistence allowance. An amount equal to fifty percent  of the wages which the employee was drawing immediately before suspension, far the first ninety days reckoned.

Provided further that where the period of suspension exceeds ninety days, but does not exceed one hundred and eighty days, the employee shall be entitled to receive, after the said period of ninety days, a subsistence allowance equal to seventy-five percent of the wages which the employee was drawing immediately before his suspension : Provided further that where the period of suspension exceeds one hundred and eighty day, the employee shall be entitled to receive wages in full which the employee was drawing immediately before his suspension:

Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>

Reg Preliminary inquiry report
1 message

Sudalai Kumar <ss.kumar1987@gmail.com>
20 December 2019 at 11:58To: cgmchennai32@gmail.com, geomine@nic.in, indsec@tn.gov.in
Bcc: yogimpsingh@gmail.com
Dated: 20-12-19

From

Dr. S. Sudalai Kumar  (Chemist, U/S) Plot No 40. DAC Delight

Door no. F8 Venkateshwara Nagar 5th street Pozhichalur Chennai-74

To

The Additional DirectorDepartment of Geology and MiningC, Chennai- 600 032

Sir/Madam,

Sub: Preliminary enquiry conducted for Chemist Dr. S. Sudalai Kumar under suspension for fake grave charges on 19-12-19.

  1. Ref.1. 4552/PM1/2019 dated 22-07-19, 31-10-19 and 16-12-19.

  2. Ref.2. NHRC order 1545/22/13/2019 dated 22-07-19

I am Dr. S. Sudalai Kumar, Chemist attended the preliminary enquiry on 19-12-19 for several fake charges given by group of women staff members Mrs and Ms. Aruna, Kavithas J and G, Priya, Deepa, Jothi, Sumathi, Muthukalyani, Asuvathi, Gowthami etc and everything was recorded by Thiru. M.K.Somasekar, Inquiry officer for the further steps. Somebody took the initiative steps for circulation of my web contents and turned this women group against me for the vengeance and forced them for signing the petition against me to terminate my service on CM cell works related to corruption scam, prostitution and bribery charges against men and women officers in the same department. Therefore, I request you to finalize the final enquiry and take action on the real culprits behind this organization of group against me.                                                                                                                                                                                                Yours Sincerely,

Sudalai Kumar

Dr. Sudalai Kumar, Chennai 74

எண்ணித் துணிக கருமம் துணிந்தபின்
எண்ணுவம் என்பது இழுக்கு.

annexure 1 and 2.pdf
5486K

3 comments on Tamil Nadu government is not providing life saving allowance

  1. THE TAMIL NADU PAYMENT OF SUBSISTENCEALLOWANCE ACT, 1981.

    3. (1) An employee who is placed under suspension, during the period of such suspension, be entitled to receive payment from the employer as subsistence allowance. An amount equal to fifty percent of the wages which the employee was drawing immediately before suspension, far the first ninety days reckoned.
    Here this question arises that why does Tamil Nadu Government not follow its own notification in the case of whistle blower?

  2. How can it be justified that official blower who is raising the matter concerned with the deep rooted corruption is being targeted by the corrupt officers of the Government of Tamilnadu and it is most unfortunate that numerous representations have been submitted before the accountable public functionaries of the Government of India but they are reluctant to take any action in the matter and a whistleblower is being persecuted by the corrupt bureaucrats which is not only undemocratic but a reflection of of demon like behaviour?

  3. Why Tamilnadu government is not pursuing its own notifications only because of corrupt public servants who are seated at the top ranks whether it is justified? Whether government machinery is really gone into the hand of the corrupt public servants and we are being ruled by the corrupt public servants? When it is evident that notification issued by the government is not being followed by the staff of the government then why action is not being taken against touch staff who are overlooking the notifications of the government?

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: