|Beerbhadra Singh <email@example.com>|
|In the financial year 2018, 729 public information officers were penalized under section 20 of R.T.I. Act 2005 with a pecuniary penalty of Rs.25000 but still not a single of them recovered.
|Beerbhadra Singh <firstname.lastname@example.org>||Sat, Oct 17, 2020, at 2:58 PM|
To: pmosb <email@example.com>, “firstname.lastname@example.org”, email@example.com, supremecourt <firstname.lastname@example.org>, urgent-action <email@example.com>, “firstname.lastname@example.org”, email@example.com, “firstname.lastname@example.org”, email@example.com, “firstname.lastname@example.org”, email@example.com, “firstname.lastname@example.org”, email@example.com, “firstname.lastname@example.org”, email@example.com, Anjali Anand Srivastava <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Hariom ojha not made available information by chief minister office even when concerned with deep irregularity
- Both the central and state government of U.P. are running away from providing information under transparency act
- Information sought from chief minister office regarding irregularity of commissioner housing and development council
- Not a single R.T.I. application submitted successfully on the portal of government of India is reflecting mismanagement