SPIO must provide information free of cost now as states section 7(6)

 

 

 

Action against PIO and FAA and sought information free of cost to appellant

Tuesday, December 31, 2019

1:00 AM

Subject Action against PIO and FAA and sought information free of cost to appellant
From Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M. P. Singh
To presidentofindia@rb.nic.in; secretarybte@gmail.com; sec. sic; supremecourt; pmosb; cmup; csup@up.nic.in; hgovup@up.nic.in
Sent Tuesday, December 31, 2019 12:42 AM
Attachments Whether government never checks the breach of provisions of R.T.I. Act 2005 as it seems that August act is thrown into dustbin because of rampant corruption.msg

 

An appeal under subsection 3 of section 19 of the Right to Information Act 2005 as PIO cryptically denied sought information and FAA remained a mute spectator of cryptic denial of sought information ipso facto obvious.

 

To

                                      Chief Information Commissioner/

                                          companion commissioners

                                        U.P. Information Commission

                                         7/7A, RTI Bhawan,

                                      Vibhuti Khand, Gomti Nagar

                                      Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh

 

Prayer- Public information officer BOARD OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION UTTAR PRADESH LUCKNOW / Mr Varun Kumar Yadav designation-Deputy secretary through its communication dated-25/11/2019 seeking more fee Rs.98 which means postal order of Rs.100 in regard to R.T.I. communiqué sent by the applicant received in the office of public authority on 27/09/2019.

Public Information Officer took near about three months in seeking the more fee when the applicant submitted the first appeal under subsection 1 of section 19 of the Right to Information Act 2005 and at this time, to take a decision on the first appeal has also expired. Which means both SPIO and FAA have violated the provisions of the Right to Information Act 2005 and subsequent communication aforementioned is only a cunning trick to make excuses before the commission nothing else.

Hon’ble Sir may be pleased to take a perusal of the following provision i.e. subsection 6 of section 7 of the Right to Information Act 2005.

(6)

Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (5), the person making

request for the information shall be provided the information free of charge where a public authority fails to comply with the time limits specified in sub-section (1).

श्री मान जी तकनीकी शिक्षा बोर्ड के जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा जन सूचना प्रार्थना पत्र दिनांक २४/०९/२०१९ को दिनांक २७/०९/२०१९ को रिसीव किया गया किन्तु मागी गई सूचना नही सिर्फ अप्राप्त है बल्कि इन ४५ दिनों में जनसूचना अधिकारी महोदय ने यह भी उपयुक्त नही समझा की यह कारण स्पस्ट करे की उनके द्वारा सूचना न प्रदान करने का कारण क्या है | इस तरह से जनसूचना अधिकारी द्वारा जनसूचना अधिकार २००५ के उपधारा १ धारा ७ खुला उल्लंघन किया गया जो की दंडनीय अपराध है जनसूचना प्रावधान के तहत |

Most revered Sir-Public Information Officer and First Appellate Authority made the mockery of the provisions of the Right to Information Act 2005 as first they procrastinated even in responding to the R.T.I. Communique submitted under subsection 1 of section 6 of the Right to Information Act 2005 and first appeal under subsection 1 of section 19 of the Right to Information Act 2005.  Now they are applying the cunning trick to deviate the attention from the real issue that they took under teeth the provisions of the Right to information act 2005 through the aforementioned communication. The matter invites the action under section 20 of the Right to Information Act 2005. Most revered Sir scan copy of the RTI communiqué is attached to the attached e-mail to this representation cum second appeal. Moreover along with the hard copy of this appeal, both the R.T.I. Communique and First appeal will be enclosed.

Following is the confirmation of delivery of the First appeal hard copy sent through speed registered post.

Booking Office

Booking Date

Article Type

Delivery Office

Delivery Date

Tariff

Mirzapur HO

18/11/2019 14:19:42

Speed Post

Lucknow GPO

20/11/2019 15:31:26

47.20

Event Details For EU883247029IN

Current Status: Item Delivery Confirmed

Date

Time

Country

Location

Event Type

Mail

Category

Next

Office

Remarks

20/11/2019

15:31:26

Lucknow GPO

Item Delivery

Confirmed

20/11/2019

13:32:23

India

Lucknow GPO (Beat Number :41)

Item Delivered

Delivered

[To: BTE(Addressee) ]

20/11/2019

10:34:16

Lucknow GPO

Out for Delivery

20/11/2019

07:54:48

Lucknow GPO

Item Received

20/11/2019

06:40:28

Lucknow NSH

Item Dispatched

20/11/2019

05:15:18

Lucknow NSH

Item Bagged

20/11/2019

02:37:04

Lucknow NSH

Item Received

19/11/2019

15:57:15

Allahabad NSH

Item Dispatched

19/11/2019

15:38:54

Allahabad NSH

Item Bagged

19/11/2019

12:56:08

Allahabad NSH

Item Received

18/11/2019

18:03:52

Mirzapur HO

Item Dispatched

18/11/2019

17:37:20

Mirzapur HO

Item Bagged

18/11/2019

14:19:42

Mirzapur HO

Item Booked

                  With great respect to the Hon’ble Sir. Please ensure the protection of the Right to Information Act 2005 and curb the violation of its provisions. For this appellant shall ever pray you, Hon’ble Sir.

Dated-31/12/2019                               Yours sincerely

                                                       Yogi M. P. Singh an authorized representative of Satyam Shukla to deal with the matter.

          Satyam Shukla S/O Sachchidanand Shukla C/O Yogi M. P. Singh, Mobile number-7379105911, Mohalla- Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road, Lakshmi Narayan Baikunth Mahadev Mandir District-Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh, Pin code-231001. 

Hard copy of first appeal is also available for public view as well as access

5 1 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
3 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Beerbhadra Singh
Beerbhadra Singh
10 months ago

It is obligatory duty of the concern State Public Information Officer to provide the information to the information seeker under subsection 6 section 7 free of cost as prescribed under aforementioned subsection of the right Information act 2005 but it is quite explicit that they will not provide any information as the corruption is rampant in the department of the Government of state as well as Government of India

Preeti Singh
7 months ago

Because of corruption, they are only procrastinating in the matter instead of providing information to the information seeker. It is quite obvious from the attached pictures,that CIC categorically ordered that provide information to the appellant within 30 days of this order. Here in this case also, concerned SPIO may also provide the information free of cost. It is unfortunate that Uttar Pradesh State Information Commission three times return the matter illegally because of corruption.