SPIO BTEUP may provide information to Satyam Shukla free of cost without any further delay

RE: Action against PIO and FAA and sought information free of cost to appellant

Saturday, January 18, 2020

6:40 PM

With due respect, I want to intimate the concerned SPIO of the government of Uttar Pradesh who is habitual to not providing sought information under the Right to Information Act 2005 and FAA habitual to not entertaining the appeals submitted under subsection 1 of section 19 Right to Information Act 2005 that my appeal has been received by the state information commission and now he has only two options and select one of them, either provide the sought information to the information seeker or be ready to tell the genuine reason of not providing sought information to Hon’ble Information Commissioner, Government of Uttar Pradesh.

Event Details For EU355286235IN

Current Status: Item Delivery Confirmed

Pasted from <https://www.indiapost.gov.in/_layouts/15/DOP.Portal.Tracking/TrackConsignment.aspx>

From: Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M. P. Singh

Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2019 12:43 AM

To: presidentofindia@rb.nic.in; secretarybte@gmail.com; sec. sic; supremecourt; pmosb; cmup; csup@up.nic.in; hgovup@up.nic.in

Subject: Action against PIO and FAA and sought information free of cost to appellant

An appeal under subsection 3 of section 19 of the Right to Information Act 2005 as PIO cryptically denied sought information and FAA remained a mute spectator of cryptic denial of sought information ipso facto obvious.

To

                                      Chief Information Commissioner/

                                          companion commissioners

                                        U.P. Information Commission

                                         7/7A, RTI Bhawan,

                                      Vibhuti Khand, Gomti Nagar

                                      Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh

Prayer- Public information officer BOARD OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION UTTAR PRADESH LUCKNOW / Mr Varun Kumar Yadav designation-Deputy secretary through its communication dated-25/11/2019 seeking more fee Rs.98 which means postal order of Rs.100 in regard to R.T.I. communiqué sent by the applicant received in the office of public authority on 27/09/2019.

Public Information Officer took near about three months in seeking the more fee when the applicant submitted the first appeal under subsection 1 of section 19 of the Right to Information Act 2005 and at this time, to take a decision on the first appeal has also expired. Which means both SPIO and FAA have violated the provisions of the Right to Information Act 2005 and subsequent communication aforementioned is only a cunning trick to make excuses before the commission nothing else.

Hon’ble Sir may be pleased to take a perusal of the following provision i.e. subsection 6 of section 7 of the Right to Information Act 2005.

श्री मान जी तकनीकी शिक्षा बोर्ड के जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा जन सूचना प्रार्थना पत्र दिनांक –२४/०९/२०१९ को दिनांक २७/०९/२०१९ को रिसीव किया गया किन्तु मागी गई सूचना नही सिर्फ अप्राप्त है बल्कि इन ४५ दिनों में जनसूचना अधिकारी महोदय ने यह भी उपयुक्त नही समझा की यह कारण स्पस्ट करे की उनके द्वारा सूचना न प्रदान करने का कारण क्या है | इस तरह से जनसूचना अधिकारी द्वारा जनसूचना अधिकार २००५ के उपधारा १ धारा ७ खुला उल्लंघन किया गया जो की दंडनीय अपराध है जनसूचना प्रावधान के तहत |

Most revered Sir-Public Information Officer and First Appellate Authority made the mockery of the provisions of the Right to Information Act 2005 as first they procrastinated even in responding to the R.T.I. Communique submitted under subsection 1 of section 6 of the Right to Information Act 2005 and first appeal under subsection 1 of section 19 of the Right to Information Act 2005.  Now they are applying the cunning trick to deviate the attention from the real issue that they took under teeth the provisions of the Right to information act 2005 through the aforementioned communication. The matter invites the action under section 20 of the Right to Information Act 2005. Most revered Sir scan copy of the RTI communiqué is attached to the attached e-mail to this representation cum second appeal. Moreover along with the hard copy of this appeal, both the R.T.I. Communique and First appeal will be enclosed.

Following is the confirmation of delivery of the First appeal hard copy sent through speed registered post.

Event Details For EU883247029IN

Current Status: Item Delivery Confirmed

                  With great respect to the Hon’ble Sir. Please ensure the protection of the Right to Information Act 2005 and curb the violation of its provisions. For this appellant shall ever pray you, Hon’ble Sir.

Dated-31/12/2019                               Yours sincerely

                                                       Yogi M. P. Singh an authorized representative of Satyam Shukla to deal with the matter.

          Satyam Shukla S/O Sachchidanand Shukla C/O Yogi M. P. Singh, Mobile number-7379105911, Mohalla- Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road, Lakshmi Narayan Baikunth Mahadev Mandir District-Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh, Pin code-231001. 

Hard copy of first appeal is also available for public view as well as access