SPIO BTEUP may provide information to Satyam Shukla free of cost without any further delay

 

 

RE: Action against PIO and FAA and sought information free of cost to appellant

Saturday, January 18, 2020

6:40 PM

Subject

RE: Action against PIO and FAA and sought information free of cost to appellant

From

Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M. P. Singh

To

yogimpsingh@outlook.com; presidentofindia@rb.nic.in; secretarybte@gmail.com; sec. sic; supremecourt; pmosb; cmup; csup@up.nic.in; hgovup@up.nic.in

Sent

Saturday, January 18, 2020 6:39 PM

With due respect, I want to intimate the concerned SPIO of the government of Uttar Pradesh who is habitual to not providing sought information under the Right to Information Act 2005 and FAA habitual to not entertaining the appeals submitted under subsection 1 of section 19 Right to Information Act 2005 that my appeal has been received by the state information commission and now he has only two options and select one of them, either provide the sought information to the information seeker or be ready to tell the genuine reason of not providing sought information to Hon’ble Information Commissioner, Government of Uttar Pradesh.

Booking Office

Booking Date

Article Type

Delivery Office

Delivery Date

Tariff

Mirzapur HO

13/01/2020 14:40:54

Speed Post

Gomti Nagar SO

15/01/2020 12:21:09

47.20

Event Details For EU355286235IN

Current Status: Item Delivery Confirmed

Date

Time

Country

Location

Event Type

Mail Category

Next Office

Remarks

15/01/2020

12:21:09

Gomti Nagar SO

Item Delivery Confirmed

15/01/2020

10:34:52

India

Gomti Nagar SO (Beat Number :33)

Item Delivered

Delivered [To SUCHNA(Addressee) ]

15/01/2020

09:25:37

Gomti Nagar SO

Out for Delivery

15/01/2020

09:11:08

Gomti Nagar SO

Item Received

15/01/2020

06:03:22

Lucknow NSH

Item Dispatched

15/01/2020

03:55:17

Lucknow NSH

Item Bagged

15/01/2020

02:28:55

Lucknow NSH

Item Received

14/01/2020

16:14:13

Mail Agency Allahabad RMS

Received at TMO

14/01/2020

15:40:43

Allahabad NSH

Item Dispatched

14/01/2020

15:33:15

Allahabad NSH

Item Bagged

14/01/2020

13:53:17

Allahabad NSH

Item Received

13/01/2020

14:40:54

Mirzapur HO

Item Booked

Pasted from <https://www.indiapost.gov.in/_layouts/15/DOP.Portal.Tracking/TrackConsignment.aspx>

From: Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M. P. Singh

Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2019 12:43 AM

To: presidentofindia@rb.nic.in; secretarybte@gmail.com; sec. sic; supremecourt; pmosb; cmup; csup@up.nic.in; hgovup@up.nic.in

Subject: Action against PIO and FAA and sought information free of cost to appellant

An appeal under subsection 3 of section 19 of the Right to Information Act 2005 as PIO cryptically denied sought information and FAA remained a mute spectator of cryptic denial of sought information ipso facto obvious.

Arbitrary denial of sought information

To

                                      Chief Information Commissioner/

                                          companion commissioners

                                        U.P. Information Commission

                                         7/7A, RTI Bhawan,

                                      Vibhuti Khand, Gomti Nagar

                                      Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh

Prayer- Public information officer BOARD OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION UTTAR PRADESH LUCKNOW / Mr Varun Kumar Yadav designation-Deputy secretary through its communication dated-25/11/2019 seeking more fee Rs.98 which means postal order of Rs.100 in regard to R.T.I. communiqué sent by the applicant received in the office of public authority on 27/09/2019.

Public Information Officer took near about three months in seeking the more fee when the applicant submitted the first appeal under subsection 1 of section 19 of the Right to Information Act 2005 and at this time, to take a decision on the first appeal has also expired. Which means both SPIO and FAA have violated the provisions of the Right to Information Act 2005 and subsequent communication aforementioned is only a cunning trick to make excuses before the commission nothing else.

Hon’ble Sir may be pleased to take a perusal of the following provision i.e. subsection 6 of section 7 of the Right to Information Act 2005.

(6)

Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (5), the person making

request for the information shall be provided the information free of charge where a public authority fails to comply with the time limits specified in sub-section (1).

श्री मान जी तकनीकी शिक्षा बोर्ड के जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा जन सूचना प्रार्थना पत्र दिनांक २४/०९/२०१९ को दिनांक २७/०९/२०१९ को रिसीव किया गया किन्तु मागी गई सूचना नही सिर्फ अप्राप्त है बल्कि इन ४५ दिनों में जनसूचना अधिकारी महोदय ने यह भी उपयुक्त नही समझा की यह कारण स्पस्ट करे की उनके द्वारा सूचना न प्रदान करने का कारण क्या है | इस तरह से जनसूचना अधिकारी द्वारा जनसूचना अधिकार २००५ के उपधारा १ धारा ७ खुला उल्लंघन किया गया जो की दंडनीय अपराध है जनसूचना प्रावधान के तहत |

Most revered Sir-Public Information Officer and First Appellate Authority made the mockery of the provisions of the Right to Information Act 2005 as first they procrastinated even in responding to the R.T.I. Communique submitted under subsection 1 of section 6 of the Right to Information Act 2005 and first appeal under subsection 1 of section 19 of the Right to Information Act 2005.  Now they are applying the cunning trick to deviate the attention from the real issue that they took under teeth the provisions of the Right to information act 2005 through the aforementioned communication. The matter invites the action under section 20 of the Right to Information Act 2005. Most revered Sir scan copy of the RTI communiqué is attached to the attached e-mail to this representation cum second appeal. Moreover along with the hard copy of this appeal, both the R.T.I. Communique and First appeal will be enclosed.

Following is the confirmation of delivery of the First appeal hard copy sent through speed registered post.

Booking Office

Booking Date

Article Type

Delivery Office

Delivery Date

Tariff

Mirzapur HO

18/11/2019 14:19:42

Speed Post

Lucknow GPO

20/11/2019 15:31:26

47.20

Event Details For EU883247029IN

Current Status: Item Delivery Confirmed

Date

Time

Country

Location

Event Type

Mail

Category

Next

Office

Remarks

20/11/2019

15:31:26

Lucknow GPO

Item Delivery

Confirmed

20/11/2019

13:32:23

India

Lucknow GPO (Beat Number :41)

Item Delivered

Delivered

[To: BTE(Addressee) ]

20/11/2019

10:34:16

Lucknow GPO

Out for Delivery

20/11/2019

07:54:48

Lucknow GPO

Item Received

20/11/2019

06:40:28

Lucknow NSH

Item Dispatched

20/11/2019

05:15:18

Lucknow NSH

Item Bagged

20/11/2019

02:37:04

Lucknow NSH

Item Received

19/11/2019

15:57:15

Allahabad NSH

Item Dispatched

19/11/2019

15:38:54

Allahabad NSH

Item Bagged

19/11/2019

12:56:08

Allahabad NSH

Item Received

18/11/2019

18:03:52

Mirzapur HO

Item Dispatched

18/11/2019

17:37:20

Mirzapur HO

Item Bagged

18/11/2019

14:19:42

Mirzapur HO

Item Booked

                  With great respect to the Hon’ble Sir. Please ensure the protection of the Right to Information Act 2005 and curb the violation of its provisions. For this appellant shall ever pray you, Hon’ble Sir.

Dated-31/12/2019                               Yours sincerely

                                                       Yogi M. P. Singh an authorized representative of Satyam Shukla to deal with the matter.

          Satyam Shukla S/O Sachchidanand Shukla C/O Yogi M. P. Singh, Mobile number-7379105911, Mohalla- Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road, Lakshmi Narayan Baikunth Mahadev Mandir District-Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh, Pin code-231001. 

Hard copy of first appeal is also available for public view as well as access

5 comments on SPIO BTEUP may provide information to Satyam Shukla free of cost without any further delay

  1. अब तो नियमानुसार जैसा की धारा ७ की उपधारा ६ कहता है की यदि केन्द्रीय या राज्य सूचना अधिकारी उपधारा १ धारा ७ जन सूचना अधिकार २००५ का उल्लंघन करता है तो उसको प्रार्थी को समस्त सूचनाए मुफ्त में उपलब्ध करनी होगी |धन्यवाद
    Hon’ble Sir may be pleased to take a perusal of the following provision i.e. subsection 6 of section 7 of the Right to Information Act 2005.

    (6)Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (5), the person making

    request for the information shall be provided the information free of charge where a public authority fails to comply with the time limits specified in sub-section (1).

  2. Undoubtedly there must be transparency and accountability in the government offices and especially when they are checking the answer sheets of the students because students do work hard

  3. Undoubtedly Satyam Shukla had to be provided the sought information as concerned with the negligence in checking copy of students which tantamount to play bad game with the future of students.

  4. Undoubtedly it is complete mis management if State Public Information officers are not providing information sought by the information seekers it is mockery of the law of land because it is tantamount to throw The Right to Information act 2005 into dustbin and same thing is performed by the state functionaries in the state as several applications are submitted under RTI act 2005 but not a single information is being provided by the concerned State Public Information officers on flimsy ground. Undoubtedly action must be taken against these Public Information officers but Modi Government and yogi government is not taking any action even those penalties which are imposed on the wrongdoer public information officers are not recovered by the accountable public functionaries in the state.

  5. Since there is no fear of penal action so not frightened PIOs are violating the provisions of the Right to Information Act 2005. Why will they frighten if no action will be taken against them even after the slapping of penalties, imposed penalties are never recovered from the salaries of the wrongdoer public information officers.

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: