Sought information was cryptically denied by the CPIO State Bank of India in order conceal wrongdoings.

Preeti Singh <preetisinghgaharwar@gmail.com>
Sought information was cryptically denied by the CPIO State Bank of India in order conceal wrongdoings.
1 message
Preeti Singh <preetisinghgaharwar@gmail.com> 26 April 2019 at 16:46

To:
customercare@sbi.co.in, agmcustomer.lholuc@sbi.co.in,
agmcustomer.lhomum@sbi.co.in, feedback.gesbi@ge.com,
sbi.12731@sbi.co.in, agmr2.zovar@sbi.co.in

An
appeal under subsection 1 of section 19 of Right to Information Act
2005 against the cryptic denial of sought information by central public
information officer / regional manager Office II, State Bank of India,
Zonal Office, Opposite Kachehari, Varanasi PIN Code-221002.
To
                                          First Appellate Authority
                                          General Manager Network III
                                              State Bank of India
                                     Local Head Office, Moti Mahal Marg Lucknow
Subject-Matter
is concerned with the wide spread corruption and serious irregularities
in the bank so central public officer cryptically denied the sought
information to the appellant.
Most revered Sir –Your applicant invites the kind attention of the Hon’ble Sir with due respect to following submissions as follows.


1-It is to be submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that following is the status of the online sought information by your appellant.

Online
RTI Status Form
Note:Fields
marked with
* are Mandatory.
Enter
Registration Number
SBILW/R/2019/50151
Name
Preeti Singh
Date
of filing
06/04/2019
Public
Authority
SBI Lucknow Circle
Status
REQUEST FORWARDED
TO CPIO
Date
of action
09/04/2019
Details of CPIO :- Telephone Number:- , Email Id:-
Nodal Officer Details :-
Telephone
Number
05222295363
Email
Id
Online
RTI Request Form Details
RTI
Request Details :-
RTI
Request Registration number
SBILW/R/2019/50151
Public
Authority
SBI Lucknow Circle
Personal
Details of RTI Applicant:-
Name
Preeti Singh
Gender
Female
Address
C/O Yogi M P Singh
Mohalla Surekapuram , Jabalpur Road, Sangmohal post office
Pincode
231001
Country
India
State
Uttar Pradesh
Status
Urban
Educational
Status
Literate
Phone
Number
Details not
provided
Mobile
Number
+91-9336252631
Email-ID
preetisinghgaharwar[at]gmail[dot]com
Request
Details :-
Citizenship
Indian
Is
the Requester Below Poverty Line ?
No
(Description of
Information sought (upto 500 characters)
Description
of Information Sought
1-Please
provide the additional duration may be taken by the state bank of India to
provide rupay card to the applicant.
2-From
the first page of the attached document, the name of the Husband is Mahesh
Pratap Singh yet you did not mention it in the address caused return back of
rupay card to the sender. Please provide the reason.
3-Please
take the perusal of first and second page, concerned speed post ID was
addressed to Branch Manager, provide the cause to mislead the applicant.
Concerned
CPIO
RM RBO – 2
VARANASI
Supporting document (only pdf upto 1 MB)

2-It is to be submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that under point 1 your appellant sought the following information as follows- 

1-Please
provide the additional duration may be taken by the state bank of India to
provide rupay card to the applicant.

It
is quite obvious that State Bank of India remained failed in order to
provide the Debit as processed after the application dated-06/11/2018 of
the appellant.Moreover there is no fault on the part of the appellant.

3-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that

under point 2 your appellant sought the following information as follows-


2-From
the first page of the attached document, the name of the Husband is Mahesh
Pratap Singh yet you did not mention it in the address caused return back of
rupay card to the sender. Please provide the reason.



4-It
is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that Hon’ble Sir may be pleased to
take a glance of the communication of superintendent of the post
District-Mirzapur as 


























Here
it is quite obvious that Debit card was returned by the department of
the post because concerned did not mention the name of the Husband in
the address which was available in the record of the Bank ipso facto
obvious from the bank detail. Therefore it is obligatory duty of the
State Bank of India to resend the debit card to the appellant.

5-It is to be submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that under point 3 your appellant sought the following information as follows-

3-Please
take the perusal of first and second page, concerned speed post ID was
addressed to Branch Manager, provide the cause to mislead the applicant.
According
to the Superintendent of the post  Division Mirzapur, aforementioned
Post ID was addressed to the branch manager city State Bank of India.
Here it is obvious that his report is more explicit as he is providing
the documentary evidences in regard to his claim.
It
may be asked from the central public information officer where are the
three points information as sought by appellant aforementioned in the
following communication made available by the post man two hours ago.

This
is a humble request of your applicant to you Hon’ble Sir that how can
it be justified to withhold public services arbitrarily and promote
anarchy, lawlessness and chaos in an arbitrary manner by making the
mockery of law of land? There is need of the hour to take harsh steps
against the wrongdoer in order to win the confidence of citizenry and
strengthen the democratic values for healthy and prosperous democracy.
For this, your applicant shall ever pray you, Hon’ble Sir. 
                                                                            Yours sincerely

Date-2604-2019             Preeti Singh C/O Yogi M. P. Singh, Mobile number- 

9336252631, 9794103433,

 Mohalla- Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road, District-Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh, Pin code-231001.

0 0 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
3 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Yogi
1 year ago

1-Please provide the additional duration may be taken by the state bank of India to provide rupay card to the applicant.
2-From the first page of the attached document, the name of the Husband is Mahesh Pratap Singh yet you did not mention it in the address caused return back of rupay card to the sender. Please provide the reason.
3-Please take the perusal of first and second page, concerned speed post ID was addressed to Branch Manager, provide the cause to mislead the applicant.

Arun Pratap Singh
1 year ago

Here this question arises that if everything is OK, then why central public information officer of state bank of India is not providing the sought information to the information seeker? Justice is not only to be delivered but seen to be delivered.
Matter is concerned with the wide spread corruption and serious irregularities in the bank so central public officer cryptically denied the sought information to the appellant.

Beerbhadra Singh
1 year ago

Why Central Public Information Officer is suggesting to the information seeker that you may go to the branch office and provide the address detail and he will provide the rupay card instead of of providing the sought information to the information seeker as required by the Law. Such activities explicitly shows that there is no transparency and accountability in the working of public authority State Bank of India as its Central Public Information Officer is running away from providing information to the information seeker. Whether it is not reflection of the Tyranny in the working of State Bank of India.