Second appeal submitted beforeClC against CPlO, department of Income Tax, India.

Online appeal application submitted

Inbox
x

Central Information Commission (CIC) no-reply@nic.in via nic.in 

17:48 (3 minutes ago)

to me, feedback-cic

Dear Yogi M P Singh,
Your online appeal is diarised. Details are given below:

1 Diary Number 603842
2 Diary date 22-07-2017

Please logon to : www.cic.gov.in for any further details.
Regards,
Central Information Commission (CIC)

Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
Whether matter concerned with serious allegations of corruption are processed in income tax department so reluctantly and lackadaisical approach is ipso facto obvious.
2 messages
Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com> 7 May 2017 at 16:03

To: Anjali Anand Srivastava <secy-cic@nic.in>, RTI Help-Desk <helprtionline-dopt@nic.in>, pmosb <pmosb@pmo.nic.in>, presidentofindia@rb.nic.in, supremecourt <supremecourt@nic.in>, urgent-action <urgent-action@ohchr.org>

An appeal under subsection 3of section 19 of Right to Information Act 2005.
To
                                  Chief Information Commissioner of India
                                The Central Information Commission,
                                                       August Kranti Bhawan,
                                                               Bhikaji Cama Place,
                                                          New Delhi 110066
Appellant –Yogi M. P. Singh ,Mohalla-Surekapuram
Jabalpur Road ,District-Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh, Pin code -231001
                Versus
1- CPIO, Income Tax Officer.
Ward 3(2). Mirzapur.
2-First appellate authority
Joint Commissioner of Income Tax, Range-III, Mirzapur.
Subject-Processing of first appeal submitted under subsection 1 of section 19 of Right to Information Act 2005 in the department of Income Tax, India in regard to slip culture rampant in India.
1-Focus is incomplete misleading information by CPIO,
2-Processing made by first appellate authority is ultravires to provision of Right to Information Act 2005.
First appellate authority -Deepti Chandola Joint commissioner of Income Tax, range -3 of Mirzapur.  
Slip culture-Popular firms like famous maternity centre, clinics and other famous establishments perform its transactions on slips instead of cash-memo or proper receipt against payments in caucus with government staffs. Thus both colluding with each other, causing huge loss to exchequer in order fill their own pockets.
 With great respect to revered Sir, your applicant invites the kind attention of the Hon’ble Sir to the following submissions as follows.
1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that please take a glance of first appeal under subsection 1 of section 19 of Right to Information Act 2005 dated-30-March-2017 attached with this representation Or by visiting this link-
Status as on 18 Dec 2016
Grievance Status Registration Number- CBODT/E/2016/12369 Name Of Complainant-
Yogi M P SINGH , Date of Receipt- 13 Sep 2016 , Received by – Central Board of Direct Taxes
(Income Tax)
Forwarded to-Commissioner of Income Tax , Officer name-GEET MALA MOHANANEY ,
Officer Designation-
Pr.CIT Contact Address Aayakar Bhawan
38, M.G. Road, Civil Lines, Allahabad 211001
Sought information -1-Please made available details of action taken on aforementioned
grievance by the concerned staffs of public authorities.
Sought information -2-Please made available the maximum duration taken by the department to
redress the grievances by the citizenry.
Sought information -3-Please made available the copy of report which was made available by the Commissioner of Income Tax ALLAHABAD to Central Board of Direct Taxes (Income Tax).
Sought information -4-Please made available name and designation of staff dealing with
aforementioned grievance in the office of income tax department
Aayakar Bhawan 38, M.G. Road, Civil Lines, Allahabad 211001 .

Please made available aforesaid sought information within stipulated time as prescribed under
subsection 1 of section 7 of Right to Information Act 2005
2-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that following incomplete misleading information by CPIO after undue delay made available today as-
                                                         GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
                                           INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, MIRZAPUR
F.No.ITO 3(2)/MZP/RTl/2O16-17/1719                                                    Date : 29.03.2017
From.
CPIO
Income Tax Officer.
Ward 3(2). Mirzapur.
To.
Sri Mahesh Pratap Singh
Yogi M. P. SIngh
MohllaIIa-Surekapuram
Jabalpur, Road. Mirzapur.
Sub: e-RTI application. Registration No.DGICI/R/2016/50525 dt 18.12.2016. under section 6(3) of
RT1 Act. 200$ of Shree Mahesh Pratap Singh, Yogi M.P. Singh. MohaIla-Surekapuram. Jabalpur
Road District- Mirzapur -reply regarding.
Please refer to the above mentioned subject,
In this connection, the information sought by you Is as under:-
1. An enquiry was made by the inspector of this office regarding your grievance. As per report of ITI  of
this office, the Dr. Meena Vishwakarma is regular tax Payer and files her income tax return on regular
basis, According to the doctor, the final bill has not been issued in your case because payment of
Rs. 6,000/- has still not been made.
2. Information sought for is available in public domain.
3. Information sought for does not pertain to this office.
4. information sought for does not pertain to this office,
The above information Is made available to you. If you are not satisfied with the above, you can appeal
to the first appellate authority I.e. Joint Commissioner of Income Tax, Range-III, Mirzapur within 30 days.
                                                                                               Yours faithfully.
                                                                                              Income Tax Officer
                                                                                             Ward-3(2). Mkzapur.
Copy to. The Joint Commissioner of Income tax. RangeIII, MirzapuR for information
                                                                Income Tax Officer
                                                              Ward.3(2). Marzapur.
It is quite obvious that point 2,3 and 4 still untouched through a cryptic dealing not in public interest and interest of this country.
3-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that whether following information can provided by the concerned ministry. If made available information under point 1 may be set as precedent,then there is no need of receipt or cash memo because every patient will be discharged with some dues so no receipt or cash memo will be provided. Such practice will keep the pockets of concerned full but public exchequer will cry.
Hon’ble CPIO may provide following information.
1-Please made available GO/CIRCULAR /ACT , WHICH allows transaction on a slip.
2-Whether Rs.10000.00 is taken on slip without providing any description of charges . Please made available provision of law allows such cryptic dealings.
3-Please made available information when more 5000.00 deposited , then also transaction was made on slip .IT Mirzapur considers it legitimate. Please made available GO/CIRCULAR.
4-When rest of six thousand paid ,then slip was taken and patient was discharged and no receipt was given. Being top monitoring body ,please provide the provision of law which allows such cryptic practice.
5-Matter concerned with Commissioner of Income Tax , Officer name-GEET MALA MOHANANEY but department procrastinated by sending RTI Communique to various public authorities. Please explain the cause of procrastination.
4-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that under point 1 ,it seems that CPIO has written character roll instead of providing sought information. The nursing home executing turnover of millions of rupees in one month, performs its business on slip not cash memo or receipt. Thanks to staffs of income tax of government of India.
5-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that First Appellate Authority, Joint Commissioner of Income Tax, Range-III, Mirzapur
 decided first the venue of hearing camp office , Income Tax building, Allahabad while the matter was subjected to jurisdiction of range -3 Mirzapur as obvious from her letter dated 05-04-2017 attached with documents. This step was arbitrary, reflection of tyranny against law of land. Again aforementioned officer changed venue to Mahanth ka shivala , Mirzapur through its communication dated-11-April-2017. Which shows that not only she was confused but also tried to confuse your appellant? Hon’ble Sir may be pleased to take the perusal of attached documents.
  6-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that undoubtedly your appellant not appeared in person in the hearing but it was not necessary obligation in accordance with the law to appear in person before first appellate authority but she remained failed in touching the points that undue delay in providing sought information and one point misleading and incomplete information was provided by CPIO accepted by her blindly. It was obligation of CPIO and first appellate authority to transfer the rest untouched points to concerned public authority under subsection 3 of section 6 of Right to Information Act 2005.
This is humble request of your applicant to you Hon’ble Sir that It can never be justified to overlook the rights of citizenry by delivering services in arbitrary manner by floating all set up norms. This is sheer mismanagement which is encouraging wrongdoers to reap benefit of loopholes in system and depriving poor citizens from right to justice. Therefore it is need of hour to take concrete steps in order to curb grown anarchy in the system. For this your applicant shall ever pray you Hon’ble Sir.
                                                                 Yours  sincerely
Date-07/05/2017                                      Yogi M. P. Singh Mobile number-7379105911
Mohalla-Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road District-Mirzapur , Uttar Pradesh ,India


2 attachments
Department of income tax is procrastinating instead of providing information.pdf
854K
First appeal before FAA Income Tax..pdf
740K
Anjali Anand Srivastava <secy-cic@nic.in> 8 May 2017 at 12:45

To: Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>

Sir/Madam,
Queries relating to Second Appeal receipt/status of the Appeal/Compliant etc. may be obtained from new CIC Helpline No. 011-26183053.

As our office on e-Court system, you will receive SMS and mail for process/stages of action etc. as and when it completed.

You may also go to our website at www.cic.gov.in and check Appeal and Complaint Status.
PA to Secretary, CIC

[Quoted text hidden]

2 comments on Second appeal submitted beforeClC against CPlO, department of Income Tax, India.

  1. Hon'ble Sir that undoubtedly your appellant not appeared in person in the hearing but it was not necessary obligation in accordance with the law to appear in person before first appellate authority but she remained failed in touching the points that undue delay in providing sought information and one point misleading and incomplete information was provided by CPIO accepted by her blindly. It was obligation of CPIO and first appellate authority to transfer the rest untouched points to concerned public authority under subsection 3 of section 6 of Right to Information Act 2005.

  2. Sought information -1-Please made available details of action taken on aforementioned
    grievance by the concerned staffs of public authorities.
    Sought information -2-Please made available the maximum duration taken by the department to
    redress the grievances by the citizenry.
    Sought information -3-Please made available the copy of report which was made available by the Commissioner of Income Tax ALLAHABAD to Central Board of Direct Taxes (Income Tax).
    Sought information -4-Please made available name and designation of staff dealing with
    aforementioned grievance in the office of income tax department
    Aayakar Bhawan 38, M.G. Road, Civil Lines, Allahabad 211001 .

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: