Posts

Excutive engineer denied information to Kamlesh Singh on ground that it concerns SHO anti power theft police station

Executive engineer EDD II violated section 7(1) of RTI Act 2005 and after appeal Provided misleading information

Excutive engineer has provided information concerning the irregularities in department which is right or wrong I have not seen

Executive engineer is procrastinating in providing compensation, to fix accountability information has been sought from him

Executive engineer misled Prime Minister Office by submitting false reports on public grievance portal to conceal corruption

Executive engineer EDD II could not provide information of electricity connection within time, so appeal made against him

It seems department of electricity is not giving compensation to the Dayanand Singh but is giving him alms in burning of wheat crop

Preeti was provided electricity connection and Sunita was denied is the violation of the article 14 of the constitution of India

Information concerning corruption in providing electricity connections by electricity distribution division second must be provided

Hand written amount of Rs.27823 as electricity provided to genuine customer by staff of U.P.P.C.L. Mirzapur whose bill was paid timely