S.B.I. neither delivered D.D. paid to registrar general nor nor refunded back paid amount to account. Anarchy

Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
Corruption can be curbed by taking action against corrupt elements not by demonetization of currencies as such move only cause the death of innocent people because of long queue before the windows of banks.
1 message
Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com> 11 December 2016 at 10:21
To: presidentofindia@rb.nic.in, pmosb <pmosb@pmo.nic.in>, supremecourt <supremecourt@nic.in>, urgent-action <urgent-action@ohchr.org>, secy-cic@nic.in, gm.customer@sbi.co.in, SBI Contact Centre <contactcentre@sbi.co.in>, cmup <cmup@up.nic.in>

Hon’ble Sir state bank of India charges Rs.25 plus service tax per transaction for amount ranges from Rs.1 to Rs.5000 if the mode of payment is demand draft and if through courier ,then it charges Rs.50 plus service tax per transaction.
11 December 2016
08:45
Hon’ble Sir please take a glance of attached documents with this representation in payment receipt concerned with the payment to registrar general high court of judicature at Allahabad ,for payment of R.T.I. Fee  amount Rs.250 through demand draft ,state bank of India charged commission Rs.86.25 while for the same payment ,postal department of government of India charges commission not more than Rs.30 rupees. Whether such fee structure is justified. 
With due respect your applicant wants to draw the kind attention of the Hon’ble Sir to the following submissions as follows.
  1. 1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that S.B.I. Deducted  Rs.413 .80 from the account of your applicant on 07-Dec-2016 arbitrarily without informing your applicant which is tantamount to day light robbery and mockery of good governance Great Modi Sir.
07Dec16 (07Dec2016) TO TRANSFER INB Citrus Payment Solutions 054440200314004IGAAJZGKK3 TRANSFER T 413.80    16,672.94
Account Number- 00000034645721675 Branch- MIRZAPUR CITY
Address- S/O RAJENDRA PRATAP SINGH, JABALPURRAOD
SUREKHAPURAM BASTI, BATHUA ,POST- SANGAMOHAL MIRZAPUR Mirzapur 231001
Account Type- SBCHQGENPUBINDRURALINR
Account Name- Mr. MAHESH PRATAP SINGH
2-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that if S.B.I. is charging commission more than set up norm, then why it levied unjustified and sheer unconstitutional commission on your applicant in the form of  Citrus Payment Solutions 054440200314004IGAAJZGKK3 TRANSFER T 413.80  .
3-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that reserve bank of India is regulatory body of banking institutions in India and your applicant sought information as please provide reason and regulations in regard to disproportionate charging of commission by state bank of India from the poor students in the name of collection of fee as structure is followed.
1-For collection of Rs.50 , service charges levied on poor students  Rs.57 i.e. More than the collection amount.
2-For collection of Rs.100 , service charges levied on poor students   Rs.57  .
3-For collection of Rs.200 , service charges levied on poor students   Rs.57  .
4-For collection of Rs.300 , service charges levied on poor students   Rs.57  .
CPIO , reserve bank of India did not make available any information and during the hearing on 5-Dec-2016 before the information commissioner Majula Parashar .denied the sought information on the ground that sought information is concerned with the state bank of India not reserved bank of India and when your applicant sought transfer of R.T.I. Communique under subsection 3 of section 6 of Right to Information act 2005,she disconnected the phone. Whether such behaviour of public functionaries is not cryptic. 
            This is humble request of your applicant to you Hon’ble Sir that It can never be justified to overlook  the rights of citizenry by delivering services in arbitrary manner by floating all set up norms. This is sheer mismanagement which is encouraging wrongdoers to reap benefit of loopholes in system and depriving poor citizens from right to justice. Therefore it is need of hour to take concrete steps in order to curb grown anarchy in the system. For this your applicant shall ever pray you Hon’ble Sir.
                                                                 Yours  sincerely
                                                     Yogi M. P. Singh Mobile number-7379105911
Mohalla-Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road District-Mirzapur , Uttar Pradesh ,India


2 attachments
RTI Application to High court Allahabad..pdf
271K
State Bank of India1.pdf
153K

Grievance Status

Print || Logout
Status as on 24 Dec 2016

Registration Number : DEABD/E/2016/18972
Name Of Complainant : Yogi M P Singh
Date of Receipt : 24 Dec 2016
Received by : Department of Financial Services (Banking Division)
Forwarded to : State Bank of India
Officer name : Shri Shekhar Srivastava
Officer Designation : General Manager
Contact Address : Corporate Centre, Customer Service Deptt.
State Bank Bhawan, 6th Floor, Madam Cama Road,
Mumbai400021
Contact Number : 02222740460
e-mail : gm.customer@sbi.co.in
Grievance Description : According to receipt of online transaction, state bank of India had to deliver the D.D. At the specified address within five working days but it is unfortunate that they breached the trust of your applicant which not only lowered the dignity of State Bank of India but also caused great damage to your applicant. Sir whether concerned will inform your applicant ,that whether they have delivered the D.D. Or only charges huge commission. If D.D. Was not delivered to Registrar general , High court ,Allahabad ,then why deducted amount was not refunded back to the account of your applicant. With due respect your applicant wants to draw the kind attention of the Hon’ble Sir to the following submissions as follows. 1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that following online transaction was made by your applicant on 27-Nov-2016 as R.T.I. Fee payment through demand draft paid to Registrar General ,High Court, Allahabad, details as R.T.I. Communique and receipt along with the letter of CPIO ,High court of judicature at Allahabad is attached with this representation in PDF form. 27Nov16 (27Nov2016) TO TRANSFER INB To pay R.T.I. Fee ID01807460 TRANSFER TO 98585127319 336.25. 2-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that how can it be legitimate that payment which was to be processed cum delivered within five working days still awaiting delivery. Whether consumer rights of citizenry are safe under the management of such tyrants. Whether such dereliction is not overlooking the basic rights and reflection of sheer insolence of concerned staffs . 3-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that whenever your applicant wanted to know the status of transaction following message display on the screen. Due to some technical problems we are unable to process your request currently. Please try later. This is humble request of your applicant to you Hon’ble Sir that It can never be justified to overlook  the rights of citizenry by delivering services in arbitrary manner by floating all set up norms. This is sheer mismanagement which is encouraging wrongdoers to reap benefit of loopholes in system and depriving poor citizens from right to justice. Therefore it is need of hour to take concrete steps in order to curb grown anarchy in the system. For this your applicant shall ever pray you Hon’ble Sir.                                                                  Yours  sincerely                                                      Yogi M. P. Singh Mobile number-7379105911 Mohalla-Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road District-Mirzapur , Uttar Pradesh ,India .
Date of Action : 24 Dec 2016

2 comments on S.B.I. neither delivered D.D. paid to registrar general nor nor refunded back paid amount to account. Anarchy

  1. According to receipt of online transaction, state bank of India had to deliver the D.D. At the specified address within five working days but it is unfortunate that they breached the trust of your applicant which not only lowered the dignity of State Bank of India but also caused great damage to your applicant. Sir whether concerned will inform your applicant ,that whether they have delivered the D.D. Or only charges huge commission. If D.D. Was not delivered to Registrar general , High court ,Allahabad ,then why deducted amount was not refunded back to the account of your applicant.

  2. It seems that honesty has been out of context and sheer dishonesty causing damage to our system in great intensity.
    Here every where is rampant corruption and every public functionary is busy in setting out his corrupt circle. Mr. Chief Manager S.B.I. when you had already charged commission during each transaction how this huge commission in the name of citrus payment solutions.Undoubtedly we are facing to much precarious situation. Whether our prime minister couldn't curb this anarchy. Why there is sheer arbitrariness in our public offices. It seems that honesty is beyond our reach.

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: