Sarita Devi needs justice and concerned institution may be instrumental in providing her justice.


Sarita Devi needs justice and concerned institution may be instrumental in providing her justice.

  

Add star  

Yogi M. P. Singh

<yogimpsingh@gmail.com>

Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 9:22 PM
To: pmosb <pmosb@pmo.nic.in>, supremecourt <supremecourt@nic.in>, urgent-action <urgent-action@ohchr.org>
Please take action against those who performed their duties negligently, no matter how much they are influential. Hon’ble Sir to spare wrongdoers means throwing away the confidence of  the civil society in the Government machinery.
Hon’ble Sir- With due respect your applicant wants to draw the kind attention of the Hon’ble Sir to the following submissions as follows.
1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir
Sarita Devi waited for nearly an hour as she figured out how to file a protest (Source: PTI)
Written by Mihir Vasavda | Incheon | Posted: October 1, 2014 1:52 am | Updated: October 1, 2014 9:39 am
The difference couldn’t be starker. Barely 15 minutes after Mongolian boxer Tugstsogt Nyambayar was controversially ousted from the men’s bantamweight category, their entire contingent decided to take the International Boxing Association (AIBA) head on.
Like Sarita Devi, Nyambayar lost to a South Korean opponent after a controversial decision. While Nyambayar was the winner, at least according to a large number of those who watched the bout. The judges felt otherwise. They had awarded the bout to Sangmyeong Ham. Immediately, the Mongolian officials swung into action. Their chef de mission, Badmaanyambu Baterdene reached the venue within minutes, took up the issue with the organisers and led the protest.
2-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir
The boxer, who felt she was a victim of a ‘pre-determined’ bout, waited for almost an hour for assistance
While the Mongolian officials were swift to act, the Indian Olympic Association (IOA) office-bearers chose not to involve themselves in Sarita’s case. Sarita did not even have the $500 required to lodge a protest with AIBA. Her husband had to depend on Sarita’s coach Lenin Meitei and an Indian journalist to pay the amount. Whether Government of India lacks fund in order to provided justice to its athletes .
Related
·         3-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir
The boxer, who felt she was a victim of a ‘pre-determined’ bout, waited for almost an hour for assistance as she and her husband Thoiba Singh tried to work out a way to submit an official protest. The coaches, who were busy attending the other boxers whose bouts were lined up, could not tend to their needs. In the end, they had to fend for themselves.
Although senior IOA officials, including secretary general Rajeev Mehta and deputy chef de mission Kuldeep Vats, were present at the venue, none offered assistance. Mehta, instead, asked a couple of journalists and Sarita herself as to why there was a delay in lodging the protest, unaware of the protocols and procedures himself. “Don’t worry, it will be fine,” he then told her. Even Olympic Council of Asia (OCA) secretary general Randhir Singh decided to steer clear from the issue. He and Vats left the venue soon after Sarita’s bout. Ipsofacto obvious that there was sheer mismanagement and accountable officers of sports ministry of Government of India are responsible for it
4-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that
Central Government Act
Article 51A in The Constitution Of India 1949
51A. Fundamental duties It shall be the duty of every citizen of India (a) to abide by the Constitution and respect its ideals and institutions, the national Flag and the National Anthem;
(b) to cherish and follow the noble ideals which inspired our national struggle for freedom;
(c) to uphold and protect the sovereignty, unity and integrity of India;
(d) to defend the country and render national service when called upon to do so;
(e) to promote harmony and the spirit of common brotherhood amongst all the people of India transcending religious, linguistic and regional or sectional diversities; to renounce practices derogatory to the dignity of women;
(f) to value and preserve the rich heritage of our composite culture;
(g) to protect and improve the natural environment including forests, lakes, rivers and wild life, and to have compassion for living creatures;
(h) to develop the scientific temper, humanism and the spirit of inquiry and reform;
(i) to safeguard public property and to abjure violence;
(j) to strive towards excellence in all spheres of individual and collective activity so that the nation constantly rises to higher levels of endeavour and achievement PART V THE UNION CHAPTER I THE EXECUTIVE The President and Vice President
  This is humble request of your applicant to you Hon’ble Sir to take action on the submitted  representation in accordance with the law so that lost confidence of countrymen in the Government machinery may be restored. For this your applicant shall ever pray you Hon’ble Sir. Here role of central Government is under cloud as not taking action against wrongdoers.
        Yours sincerely
      Yogi M. P. Singh
Mohalla-Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road, District-Mirzapur, State-Uttar Pradesh, India

2 comments on Sarita Devi needs justice and concerned institution may be instrumental in providing her justice.

  1. The boxer, who felt she was a victim of a ‘pre-determined’ bout, waited for almost an hour for assistance as she and her husband Thoiba Singh tried to work out a way to submit an official protest. The coaches, who were busy attending the other boxers whose bouts were lined up, could not tend to their needs. In the end, they had to fend for themselves.
    Although senior IOA officials, including secretary general Rajeev Mehta and deputy chef de mission Kuldeep Vats, were present at the venue, none offered assistance. Mehta, instead, asked a couple of journalists and Sarita herself as to why there was a delay in lodging the protest, unaware of the protocols and procedures himself. “Don’t worry, it will be fine,” he then told her. Even Olympic Council of Asia (OCA) secretary general Randhir Singh decided to steer clear from the issue. He and Vats left the venue soon after Sarita’s bout. Ipsofacto obvious that there was sheer mismanagement and accountable officers of sports ministry of Government of India are responsible for it

  2. यहाँ पर गरीब महिलाओं वैसे भी न्याय नहीं मिलता हैं ।महिलाओं का शोषण किस जगह नहीं हो रहा हैं ।नीचे से ऊपर तक सभी इस काम में लगे हुए हैं । सार्वजनिक स0अस्थान पर महिलाओं का शील भंग किया गया किन्तु कोई कार्यवाही नहीं हुई ।

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: