Rs.12900 was drawn from the account of S.C. girl Anjali Kumari from Sirsa Branch of S.B.I. now running away

 

Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>

Closure letter – Complaint No : 201920011032606

Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com> 8 October 2020 at 21:29
To: cms.bokanpur@rbi.org.in, pmosb <pmosb@pmo.nic.in>, presidentofindia@rb.nic.in, supremecourt <supremecourt@nic.in>, urgent-action <urgent-action@ohchr.org>
Complaint no – 201920011032606 submitted on 22-June-2020 Aggrieved applicant submitted representation on 03/02/2020 by appearing in person as directed by Lucknow head office of S.B.I. and State Bank of India is procrastinating on the issue. Where is inordinate delay if application/complaint submitted against the inaction of S.B.I. on the representation dated 03/02/2020 of aggrieved girl student on 22/06/2020. I think that more procrastination was made by the Banking ombudsman itself ipso facto from attached documents. Detail representation is attached herewith.
Aggrieved bank account is a student account which is opened for specific purposes and more privileged in comparison to saving account.
Sir section 9 of the The Banking Ombudsman Scheme 2006 deals with the PROCEDURE FOR FILING COMPLAINT and its subsection 3 deals with No complaint to the Banking Ombudsman shall lie unless:-
3(b) the complaint is made not later than one year after the complainant has received the reply of the bank to his representation or, where no reply is received, not later than one year and one month after the date of the representation to the bank;
Hon’ble Sir, you took the aforementioned subsection 3 (b) of section 9 of the The Banking Ombudsman Scheme 2006 to deprive the aggrieved vulnerable student Anjali Kumari of her public assistance provided by the government of India siphoned by the concerned branch staff of the State Bank of India. 
 
13. REJECTION OF THE COMPLAINT The Banking Ombudsman may reject a complaint at any stage if it appears to him that the complaint made is; a. 6not on the grounds of complaint referred to in clause 8; or
b. 7otherwise not in accordance with Sub Clause (3) of clause 9; or
Moreover As per the extant instructions, no relief can be granted to the complainant because of the inordinate delay in reporting the disputed transaction to the bank.
Matter was reported to S.B.I. earlier but written representation by the aggrieved girl itself as 
Aggrieved applicant submitted aforementioned representation on 03/02/2020 and State Bank of India is procrastinating on the issue. Whether S.B.I. will not respond to the aforementioned representation of the aggrieved girl? State Bank of India is a necessary party in the matter, being banking ombudsman, how can you Honourable sir support the illegal and corrupt stand of state bank of India of not responding arbitrarily on the representation dated 03/02/2020. 
Grievance Status for registration number : DEABD/E/2020/54805
Grievance Concerns To
Name Of Complainant-Yogi M. P. Singh
Date of Receipt-28/09/2020
Received By Ministry/Department Financial Services (Banking Division)
Grievance Description-Financial Services (Banking Division) >> Fraud
Department/Bank/Financial Institute : Other / Private Sector Bank.
Officer Name Pankaj Kumar Nayak Officer Designation Banking Ombudsman_Kanpur Grievance Status for registration number : DEABD/E/2020/47052
Grievance Concerns To Name Of Complainant Yogi M. P. Singh Date of Receipt 30/08/2020 Detail of the grievance is attached to this representation.
Complaint no – 201920011032606 submitted on 22-June-2020 by Anjali Kumari before Kanpur Banking Ombudsman be taken into account. Ombudsman may be just and fair in its action and its own reasoned order in the matter.
Grievance Document
Current Status
Under process
Date of Action
29/09/2020
Remarks
कृपया शिकायत की जांच समयबद्ध रूप से करने की व्‍यवस्‍था करें और शिकायत कर्ता को उपयुक्त उत्तर भेजें । और उसके निपटान के तुरंत बाद शिकायतकर्ता को भेजें गए उत्तर को सीपीग्राम्स पोर्टल पर भी अपनी टिप्पणी/ कार्रवाई के साथ अपलोड करें। Kindly arrange to examine and redress the grievance and give appropriate reply to the complainant within a time bound manner. After redressal, a copy of reply given to complainant along with your comments/action may be uploaded on the CPGRAMS portal.

खुदा भी आसमाँ से जब जमी पे देखता होगा |

इस मेरे प्यारे देश को क्या हुआ सोचता होगा||

This is a humble request of your applicant to you Hon’ble Sir that how can it be justified to withhold public services arbitrarily and promote anarchy, lawlessness and chaos arbitrarily by making the mockery of law of land? There is need of the hour to take harsh steps against the wrongdoer to win the confidence of citizenry and strengthen the democratic values for healthy and prosperous democracy. For this, your applicant shall ever pray for you, Hon’ble Sir.

Date-08/10/2020           Yours sincerely

                              Yogi M. P. Singh, Mobile number-7379105911, Mohalla- Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road, District-Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh, Pin code-231001.

5 comments on Rs.12900 was drawn from the account of S.C. girl Anjali Kumari from Sirsa Branch of S.B.I. now running away

  1. Aggrieved applicant submitted aforementioned representation on 03/02/2020 and State Bank of India is procrastinating on the issue. Whether S.B.I. will not respond to the aforementioned representation of the aggrieved girl? State Bank of India is a necessary party in the matter, being banking ombudsman, how can you Honourable sir support the illegal and corrupt stand of state bank of India of not responding arbitrarily on the representation dated 03/02/2020.

  2. Think about the gravity of situation that near about hundred representations have been submitted in the matter concerned with the corruption in the State Bank of India by the Anjali Kumari and public spirited person Yogi M. P. Singh12900 rupees drawn from her account and this money was sent by the government of India as a scholarship to her. It is unfortunate that concerned public functionaries of the Government of India are showing reluctant approach in taking action in this matter concerned with the deep rooted corruption.

  3. Our motive is good governance but good governance cannot be achieved if there is no firm will of the public functionaries if they are corrupt how can we promote good governance in the government machinery? Neither public authority State Bank of India provided information to the information seeker under Right to Information act 2005 nor it took any action and the Representation submitted by the aggrieved girl student on the branch of the State Bank of India concerned.

  4. Whether they will pay heed to such directions undoubtedly not quite obvious from their working styles?
    Kindly arrange to examine and redress the grievance and give appropriate reply to the complainant within a time bound manner. After redressal, a copy of reply given to complainant along with your comments/action may be uploaded on the CPGRAMS portal.

  5. Moreover As per the extant instructions, no relief can be granted to the complainant because of the inordinate delay in reporting the disputed transaction to the bank.
    Here delay is done because fraudulent dealings came into the light when State Bank of India after too much procrastinations provided the passbook to the applicant. Since the matter was concerned with the scholarship so it was obligation of the applicant to inform the government functionaries.

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: