R.R.B. did not provide the sought information so appeal filed in CIC India

Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
Online appeal application submitted
1 message
Central Information Commission (CIC) <no-reply@nic.in> 31 October 2019 at 12:25

To: yogimpsingh@gmail.com
Cc: feedback-cic@gov.in

Dear Yogi M P Singh,
Your online appeal is diarised. Details are given below:
1 Diary Number 655480
2 Diary date 31-10-2019
Please logon to : www.cic.gov.in for any further details.
Regards,
Central Information Commission (CIC)

Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
Whether it is not mockery of Right to Information Act 2005 that arbitrary replies are made under it?
1 message
Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com> 1 October 2019 at 23:46

To: pmosb <pmosb@pmo.nic.in>, supremecourt <supremecourt@nic.in>, presidentofindia@rb.nic.in, urgent-action <urgent-action@ohchr.org>, Anjali Anand Srivastava <secy-cic@nic.in>, msrrbbnc@gmail.com, rrbbnc46@gmail.com

An appeal under subsection 3 of section 19 of the Right to Information Act 2005 to seek information from the 
To
                                  Chief Information Commissioner of India
                                The Central Information Commission,
                                            Baba Gangnath Marg, Munirka,
                              New Delhi – 110 067
Appellant Yogi M. P. Singh, Mohalla-Surekapuram
Jabalpur Road, District-Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh, Pin code -231001
                Versus
1-Central Public Information Officer, SUVARNA DESHPANDE DASH
Phone: 080-23334147
2-First Appellate Authority 
B KASIVISWANATHAN
Phone: 080-23330378
Cryptic denial of sought Information was made available by CPIO after 67 days but no violation of provision for F.A.A. & F.A.A. blindly overlooked the arbitrary denial of sought information. 
Sought Information-
1-Matter concerned with railway recruitment Board Allahabad was processed by B. Kasiviswanathan, Chairman, Railway Recruitment board Bangalore in the attached grievance so please provide the reason as required under subsection 1 d of section 4 of R.T.I. Act of 2005. 2-Provide the duration would be taken by Railway recruitment board to refund the excess paid fee of Kuldeep Kumar Chaudhary as promised. 3-Provide posting and designation detail of staff who processed the attached grievance.
Reply of the CPIO –With reference to your RTI application cited above, It is advised that the details sought are grievance which do not come under the definition of information under RTI Act.
Decision of the FAA-With reference to your appeal cited above it is advised that, the initial RTI application dt. 09/06/2019 has been replied by APIO/RRB/Bangalore on 16/08/2019 and stands good. Hence, this appeal is disposed.

Most revered Sir –Your applicant invites the kind attention of Hon’ble Sir with due respect to following submissions as follows.

1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that following is the concerned grievance which is core issue to seek information. 
Grievance Status for registration number : MORLY/E/2019/06094
Grievance Concerns To
Name Of Complainant –Yogi M. P. Singh Date of Receipt –24/04/2019
Received By Ministry/Department –Railways, ( Railway Board)
Grievance Description
An application under article 51 A of the constitution of India for the refund of paid fee as promised by the recruiting agency Railway Recruitment Board Allahabad.
The matter is concerned with the non-refund of the paid fee of the Kuldeep Kumar Chaudhary whose registration number is 1381792722 and roll number is 132017084810275 and receipt of the examination hall is attached to the grievance.
Sir, a message was sent on the e-mail of the aggrieved aspirant Kuldeep Kumar Chaudhary on 01 April 2019 at 46 minutes past 8 O clock in the evening.
Dear Candidate, Your Exam fee refund for CEN 02/2018 initiated by RRBs had failed due to incorrect bank details furnished by you in the application. You were given a one-time opportunity to correct your bank account details immediately through the Update Bank Account link provided on the official websites of RRBs. Detail is attached.
Subsequently, your applicant rectified IFSC code by substituting O by 0 and it is unfortunate that still, you have not refunded the paid fee as promised by the recruiting agency.
Again you may take a glance of the Bank detail as the scanned copy of passbook is attached to the grievance. I expect that no further excuse will be made by the concerned by taking the recourse of which poor aspirant may be deprived of its money which belongs to him.
Again account detail of the applicant is provided herewith so that no more confusion may arise at this juncture. Name of the account holder-KULDIP KUMAR CHAUDHARY Name of Father-RAMBABU CHAUDHARY IFSC Code-BARB0JABMIR and the account number is 10380100025087
Grievance Document  Current Status –Case closed
Date of Action –16/05/2019
Remarks –With reference to the above, it is advised that your “Refund of Examination Fee” on attending CBT for the post of Level -1 of 7th CPC of CEN 02/2018, is under process.
Rating-Poor
Rating Remarks
1-Matter concerned with railway recruitment Board Allahabad was processed by B. Kasiviswanathan, Chairman, Railway Recruitment board Bangalore in the attached grievance so please provide the reason as required under subsection 1 d of section 4 of R.T.I. Act of 2005. 2-Provide the duration would be taken by Railway recruitment board to refund the excess paid fee of Kuldeep Kumar Chaudhary as promised. 3-Provide posting and designation detail of staff who processed the attached grievance.
Officer Concerns To Officer Name –B. Kasiviswanathan Officer Designation –Chairman
Contact Address Railway Recruitment board/bangalore 18,Miller road Bangalore
Email Address rrbbnc@gmail.com Contact Number –08023333453 Reminder(s) / Clarification(s)  Reminder Date
Remarks-14/05/2019
Complaint was received by the concerned on 24/04/2019 but not redressed still which implies that concerned staffs of the public authority have no sympathy with the aggrieved student.Aggrieved student belongs to the oppressed class and those not interested to refund the paid fee committing criminal act of cheating so must be subjected to scrutiny under scheduled caste and scheduled tribes act.
 2-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that following is the online submitted online R.T.I. Communique.
Online RTI Request Form Details
 RTI Request Details :-
RTI Request Registration number
RRBBL/R/2019/80222
Public Authority
RRB (Railway Recruitment Board), Bangalore
Personal Details of RTI Applicant:-
Name
Yogi M P Singh
Gender
Male
Address
Mohalla Surekapuram , Jabalpur Road, District Mirzapur
Pincode
231001
Country
India
State
Uttar Pradesh
Status
Urban
Educational Status
Literate
 
Above Graduate
Phone Number
Details not provided
Mobile Number
+91-7379105911
Email-ID
yogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com
Request Details :-
Citizenship
Indian
Is the Requester Below Poverty Line ?
No
(Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters)
 
Description of Information Sought
 
1-Matter concerned with railway recruitment Board Allahabad was processed by B. Kasiviswanathan, Chairman, Railway Recruitment board Bangalore in the attached grievance so please provide the reason as required under subsection 1 d of section 4 of R.T.I. Act of 2005. 2-Provide the duration would be taken by Railway recruitment board to refund the excess paid fee of Kuldeep Kumar Chaudhary as promised. 3-Provide posting and designation detail of staff who processed the attached grievance.
 
Concerned CPIO
SUVARNA DESHPANDE DASH
Supporting document (only pdf upto 1 MB)
 
 
 3-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that following is the status of the R.T.I. Communique.
Online RTI Status Form
Note:Fields marked with * are Mandatory.
Enter Registration Number
RRBBL/R/2019/80222
Name
Yogi M P Singh
Date of filing
09/06/2019
Public Authority
RRB (Railway Recruitment Board), Bangalore
Status
REQUEST DISPOSED OF
Date of action
16/08/2019
Reply :- With reference to your RTI application cited above, It is advised that the details sought are grievance which do not come under the definition of information under RTI Act.
 
CPIO Details :-
SUVARNA DESHPANDE DASH
Phone: 080-23334147
First Appellate Authority Details :-
B KASIVISWANATHAN
Phone: 080-23330378
Nodal Officer Details :-
 
Telephone Number
08023334147
Email Id
 
 
  4-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that following is first appeal submitted under subsection 1 of section 19 of the Right to Information Act 2005.
Online RTI Appeal Form Details
 
RTI Appeal Details :-
RTI Appeal Registration number
RRBBL/A/2019/60025
Public Authority
RRB (Railway Recruitment Board), Bangalore
Personal Details of Appellant:-
Request Registration Number
RRBBL/R/2019/80222
Request Registration Date
09/06/2019
Name
Yogi M P Singh
Gender
Male
Address
Mohalla Surekapuram , Jabalpur Road, District Mirzapur
Pincode
231001
Country
India
State
Uttar Pradesh
Status
Urban
Educational Status
Literate
 
Above Graduate
Phone Number
Details not provided
Mobile Number
+91-7379105911
Email-ID
yogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com
Appeal Details :-
Citizenship
Indian
Is the Requester Below Poverty Line ?
No
Ground For Appeal
No Response Within the Time Limit
CPIO of Public Authority approached
SUVARNA DESHPANDE DASH
CPIO’s Order/Decision Number
Details not provided
CPIO’s Order/Decision Date
 
(Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters)
 
Prayer or Relief Sought
 
Sir how can it be justified that CPIO violated the provision of Right to Information Act 2005 as under subsection 1 of section 7 of Right to Information Act 2005, he had to make available information within 30 days from the date of the receipt of the R.T.I. Communique. Here CPIO remained failed in complying the provisions of transparency act so action must be taken against him. Information sought must be provided to the appellant as soon as possible.
 
Supporting document (only pdf upto 1 MB)
Supporting document not provided
 
 5-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that following is the status of the aforementioned submitted online appeal.
Online RTI First Appeal Status Form
Note:Fields marked with * are Mandatory.
Enter Registration Number
RRBBL/A/2019/60025
Name
Yogi M P Singh
Date of filing
19/07/2019
Public Authority
RRB (Railway Recruitment Board), Bangalore
Status
APPEAL DISPOSED OF
Date of action
01/10/2019
Reply :- With reference to your appeal cited above it is advised that, the initial RTI application dt. 09/06/2019 has been replied by APIO/RRB/Bangalore on 16/08/2019 and stands good. Hence, this appeal is disposed.
 
Nodal Officer Details :-
 
Telephone Number
08023334147
Email Id
 

This is a humble request of the applicant to you Hon’ble Sir that how can it be justified to withhold public services arbitrarily and promote anarchy, lawlessness, and chaos in an arbitrary manner by making the mockery of law of land? This is need of the hour to take harsh steps against the wrongdoer in order to win the confidence of citizenry and strengthen the democratic values for healthy and prosperous democracy. For this, your applicant shall ever pray you, Hon’ble Sir.                                                         

                                                                                                                             Yours sincerely

Date-01-10-2019              Yogi M. P. Singh, Mobile number-7379105911, Mohalla- Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road, District-Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh, Pin code-231001.

5 comments on R.R.B. did not provide the sought information so appeal filed in CIC India

  1. Reply of the CPIO -With reference to your RTI application cited above, It is advised that the details sought are grievance which do not come under the definition of information under RTI Act.

    Decision of the FAA-With reference to your appeal cited above it is advised that, the initial RTI application dt. 09/06/2019 has been replied by APIO/RRB/Bangalore on 16/08/2019 and stands good. Hence, this appeal is disposed.

  2. Sought information was denied after 67 days from the date of receipt of the R.T.I. Application by the CPIO Railway which is mockery of the provisions of Right to Information Act 2005.
    Cryptic denial of sought Information was made available by CPIO after 67 days but no violation of provision for F.A.A. & F.A.A. blindly overlooked the arbitrary denial of sought information.

  3. Whether such reply in reference of the R.T.I. Communique is justified as it is mockery of the provisions of the right to information Act 2005.
    Reply of the CPIO -With reference to your RTI application cited above, It is advised that the details sought are grievance which do not come under the definition of information under RTI Act.Decision of the FAA-With reference to your appeal cited above it is advised that, the initial RTI application dt. 09/06/2019 has been replied by APIO/RRB/Bangalore on 16/08/2019 and stands good. Hence, this appeal is disposed.

  4. Neither R.B.I. nor state bank of India provided the sought information. We are living in a failed democracy which is failed because of rampant corruption in the government. machinery.

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: