Right to reason is indispensable part of sound judicial system.

FW: Your application for Faculty Program has been rejected

Inbox
x

Sudalai Kumar ss.kumar1987@gmail.com

Jan 30 (2 days ago)

to pbalame
Dear sir,

I don’t know the reason for the rejection of my application. I will have to file rti act 2005 for this reason of rejection. I wanted to know the slected candidates details to know the tranparency.
Best regards
Prof. Sudalai Kumar.
Sent from my Windows Phone

From: noreply@nic.in
Sent: ‎30-‎01-‎2016 03:15 PM
To: ss.kumar1987@gmail.com
Subject: Your application for Faculty Program has been rejected

Dear Sudalai Kumar S

In response to the advertisement for July  2015 session, we have received your application for considering under INSPIRE Faculty Award component of the INSPIRE Program. The applications along with other documents were evaluated by the respective discipline-base expert committee, within the available mechanism of selection process. However, we regret to inform you that your application was not considered for offer of position in this session of INSPIRE Faculty Award.We thank you for showing your interest in this component and wishing you success in your future endeavor.

Reason : NO

Thanks
INSPIRE (DST)
Technology Bhawan
New Mehrauli Road
New Delhi
110016
Phone no -+ 91-1126567373
Even in respect of administrative orders Lord Denning M.R. in 
Breen v. Amalgamated Engineering Union (1971 (1) All E.R. 1148) observed 
“The giving of reasons is one of the fundamentals of good 
administration”. In Alexander Machinery (Dudley) Ltd. v. Crabtree (1974 
LCR 120) it was observed: “Failure to give reasons amounts to denial of 
justice”. Reasons are live links between the mind of the decision taker 
to the controversy in question and the decision or conclusion arrived 
at”. Reasons substitute subjectivity by objectivity. The emphasis on 
recording reasons is that if the decision reveals the “inscrutable face 
of the sphinx”, it can, by its silence, render it virtually impossible 
for the Courts to perform their appellate function or exercise the power 
of judicial review in adjudging the validity of the decision. Right to 
reason is an indispensable part of a sound judicial system, reasons at 
least sufficient to indicate an application of mind to the matter before 
Court. Another rationale is that the affected party can know why the 
decision has gone against him. One of the salutary requirements of 
natural justice is spelling out reasons for the order made, in other 
words, a speaking out. The “inscrutable face of a sphinx” is ordinarily 
incongruous with a judicial or quasi-judicial performance. 

2 comments on Right to reason is indispensable part of sound judicial system.

  1. If judiciary itself not pursuing such idealism, then how can it be expected from other organs of the government?
    “Failure to give reasons amounts to denial of
    justice”. Reasons are live links between the mind of the decision taker
    to the controversy in question and the decision or conclusion arrived
    at”. Reasons substitute subjectivity by objectivity.

  2. Whatever is said by me lordships, is only to show pseudo honestly but their working style itself cryptic and promoting corruption in the society.

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: