Registration for Uttaranchal was used for Uttar Pradesh but mobile update not allowed as form already filled

Diary No. 20411/SCI/PIL(E)/2018
Application Date 21-04-2018
Received On 02-05-2018
Applicant Name YOGI M P SINGH
Address MOHALLA SUREKAPURAM JABALPUR ROAD DIST MIRZAPUR
State UTTAR PRADESH
Action Taken UNDER PROCESS
Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
CPIO Postal department made the mockery of the Right to Information Act 2005 by denying the sought information.
1 message
Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com> 21 April 2018 at 23:23
To: rtiposts@indiapost.gov.in, Anjali Anand Srivastava <secy-cic@nic.in>, registrar-cic@nic.in, pmosb <pmosb@pmo.nic.in>, presidentofindia@rb.nic.in, supremecourt <supremecourt@nic.in>, urgent-action <urgent-action@ohchr.org>

An appeal under subsection 3 of section 19 of Right to Information Act 2005 is being filed before central information commission as follows-

To

                             Chief information commissioner of India

                                   The Central Information Commission

                                               August Kranti Bhawan,

                                                    Bhikaji Cama Place,

                                                    New Delhi – 110066

Appellant-Yogi M. P. Singh S/O Rajendra Pratap Singh

Mohalla –Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road

District-Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh, India. 
                                                                                                                      versus
Respondents-1-Central Public Information Officer, R. K. Awasthi,
Director Recruitment, Office of the chief postmaster general, U.P. Circle 
Lucknow Pincode-226001.
2- First appellate authority,  Director postal services {HQ}, 
 O/o Post Master General, Lucknow -226001.
Subject- CPIO rejected the R.T. I. Application on the flimsy ground without taking the perusal of attached documents with the R.T.I. application so must be subjected to penal proceedings under section 20 of the Right to Information Act 2005. Such tendency of CPIO must be curbed in order to contain growing corruption in the government machinery under control. 
FAA through its decision in the appeal under subsection 1 of section 19 taken by him on 05-March-2018 only upheld the wrong stand of the central public information officer which explicitly shows that First appellate authority is acting in caucus with CPIO and blindly supporting the unlawful stand taken by the CPIO by making the mockery of the provisions of the Right to Information Act 2005.
With great respect to revered Sir, your applicant invites the kind attention of the Hon’ble Sir to the following submissions as follows.
 1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that the appellant submitted online RTI Application on 02-Dec-2017 which was registered as POSTS/R/2017/56279. For detail, please take a glance at the following. 
Enter Registration Number
POSTS/R/2017/56279
Name
Yogi M P Singh
Date of filing
02/12/2017
Public Authority
Department of Posts
Status
REQUEST DISPOSED OF
Date of action
24/01/2018
Reply :- information is attached herewith.
View Document
Nodal Officer Details :-
Telephone Number
23036550
Email Id
   2-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that following two-point information was sought by the appellant from the central public information officer as follows.
Online RTI Request Form Details 
RTI Request Details :-
RTI Request Registration number
POSTS/R/2017/56279
Public Authority
Department of Posts
Personal Details of RTI Applicant:-
Name
Yogi M P Singh
Gender
Male
Address
Mohalla-Surekapuram , Jabalpur Road , District Mirzapur
Pincode
231001
Country
India
State
Uttar Pradesh
Status
Urban
Educational Status
Literate
Above Graduate
Phone Number
Details not provided
Mobile Number
+91-7379105911
Email-ID
yogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com
Request Details :-
Citizenship
Indian
Is the Requester Below Poverty Line ?
No
(Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters)
Description of Information Sought
1-Please provide detail about the update of website inviting online application for GDS by the department of the post in regard Uttar Pradesh circle. 
2-Fee ID P888FD4B46CF13 Reference number- R6791D1891D8D application not submitted because the update of mobile not allowed as modifications not allowed after successful submission of application.Please make available details of the application submitted against aforementioned Fee ID.
Concerned CPIO
UP, AD(Rectt)
Supporting document (only pdf upto 1 MB)
   3-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that Central Public Information Officer denied the sought information to appellant cryptically through its communication dated 08-Jan-2018. Hon’ble Sir may be pleased to take a glance at the attached document to this representation. 
 4-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that on 14-Jan-2018, the appellant submitted online RTI appeal under subsection 1 of section 19 of the Right to Information Act 2005 which was registered as POSTS/A/2018/60058 on the website of the government of India. The current status is as follows.   
Enter Registration Number
POSTS/A/2018/60058
Name
Yogi M P Singh
Date of filing
14/01/2018
Public Authority
Department of Posts
Status
APPEAL DISPOSED OF
Date of action
07/03/2018
Reply :- Decisions is annexed
View Document
Nodal Officer Details :-
Telephone Number
23036550
Email Id
  5-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that Hon’ble Sir may be pleased to take a glance at the appeal submitted as follows.
Online RTI Appeal Form Details 
RTI Appeal Details :-
RTI Appeal Registration number
POSTS/A/2018/60058
Public Authority
Department of Posts
Personal Details of Appellant:-
Request Registration Number
POSTS/R/2017/56279
Request Registration Date
02/12/2017
Name
Yogi M P Singh
Gender
Male
Address
Mohalla-Surekapuram , Jabalpur Road, District Mirzapur
Pincode
231001
Country
India
State
Uttar Pradesh
Status
Urban
Educational Status
Literate
Above Graduate
Phone Number
Details not provided
Mobile Number
+91-7379105911
Email-ID
yogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com
Appeal Details :-
Citizenship
Indian
Is the Requester Below Poverty Line ?
No
Ground For Appeal
Refused access to Information Requested
CPIO of Public Authority approached
Details not provided
CPIO’s Order/Decision Number
Details not provided
CPIO’s Order/Decision Date
(Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters)
Prayer or Relief Sought
Please take a glance at attached appeal in PDF form under subsection 1 of section 19 of Right to Information Act 2005.
Supporting document (only pdf upto 1 MB)

 6-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that Hon’ble Sir may be pleased to take a glance at the attachment with the aforementioned appeal as follows.  

An appeal under subsection 1 of section 19 of Right to Information Act 2005. 
To 
                                                                                 First appellate authority Director postal services {HQ}, 
                                                                                        O/o Post Master General, Lucknow -226001 
Subject -Rejected the R.T. I. Application on flimsy ground. 
Hon’ble Sir -Your appellant invites the attention of the Hon’ble Sir to the following submissions as follows.
 1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that first, you direct the CPIO to update the status of R.T.I. Application as today’s status is as follows. Enter Registration Number POSTS/R/2017/56279 Name Yogi M P Singh Date of filing 02/12/2017 Public Authority Department of Posts Status REQUEST FORWARDED TO CPIO Date of action 03/12/2017 Nodal Officer Details :- Telephone Number 23036550 Email Idrtiposts@indiapost.gov.in 
Which ipso facto proves that your CPIO has no regard to prescribed duties and provisions of the act as not apprised to National portal dedicated to promotion to august act as not updated by him which was his obligatory duties. 2-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that under point 1 your appellant sought information as follows. 1-Please provide detail about the update of website inviting online application for GDS by the department of the post in regard Uttar Pradesh circle. According to CPIO, Sought information can’t be provided as the question is not clear. Here CPIO cunningly concealed “obviously sought information in public interest” as they didn’t update the website concerned with the inviting application of aspirants by the recruiters quite obvious from fact that those registered one year earlier couldn’t update registration and on the ground of earlier registration but after the submissions of fee update of Mobile number couldn’t be allowed on the ground of fact that they one year earlier had submitted successful application for other states. Thus department amassed huge illegal money in the name of fee for application but actually, the application was not accepted. Whether the behaviours like robber of public staffs can be allowed in this largest democracy in the world? The root cause of not providing sought information is to avoid to be exposed in the public domain in regards to wrong deeds caused amassing huge money illegally. 3-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that under point 2 your appellant sought information as follows. 2-Fee ID P888FD4B46CF13 Reference number- R6791D1891D8D application not submitted because the update of mobile not allowed as modifications not allowed after successful submission of application. Please make available details of the application submitted against aforementioned Fee ID. Hon’ble Sir, CPIO made available information as -No information has been sought. According to incompetent CPIO, your appellant sought to redress of the grievance which is beyond the amenability under the august act. It seems that lenient to its allocated duties, lax and careless CPIO even didn’t think it appropriate to take a perusal of supporting documents with the R.T. I. Application, ipso facto obvious that your appellant sought information regarding the action detail submitted before accountable public functionaries in the department which were annexed with the R.T.I. Application. Since concerned staffs as usual throw the grievances of the common citizenry into the dustbin so CPIO made a childish reply in regard to aforementioned point. Consequently, CPIO made the mockery of provisions of Right to Information Act 2005 so subject to appropriate penal proceedings in accordance with the law. 


4 attachments
CPIO ReplyDocument Postal department.pdf
451K
Fist appeal attachment.pdf
279K
ReplyDocument postal department.pdf
129K
document attached with online RTI Application.pdf
680K
0 0 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
1 Comment
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh

Since concerned staffs as usual throw the grievances of the common citizenry into the dustbin so CPIO made a childish reply in regard to aforementioned point. Consequently, CPIO made the mockery of provisions of Right to Information Act 2005 so subject to appropriate penal proceedings in accordance with the law.