Please refund the fee taken by University illegally from the student Kuldeep Kumar Chaudhary.

Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
Please refund the fee taken by University illegally from the student Kuldeep Kumar Chaudhary.
1 message
Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com> 1 December 2017 at 13:10
To: vcmgkvp@gmail.com, Registrar MGKVP <registrar.mgkvp@gmail.com>, cmup <cmup@up.nic.in>, pmosb <pmosb@pmo.nic.in>, hgovup@up.nic.in, supremecourt <supremecourt@nic.in>, urgent-action <urgent-action@ohchr.org>, uphrclko <uphrclko@yahoo.co.in>, csup@up.nic.in, presidentofindia@rb.nic.in, lokayukta@hotmail.com

Most revered Sir –Your applicant invites the kind attention of Hon’ble Sir with due respect to following submissions as follows.
It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that 
Lacunae on the part of MGKVP University Varanasi is as follows.
1-After more than two dozen representations and one-year later, they made available information that a private student can’t apply for two subjects of History ipso facto obvious from the following image.
2-If aforementioned norms were set up by University, then why the applicant Kuldeep Kumar Chaudhary belonging to weaker and downtrodden section was allowed to submit form who opted for two subjects of History and requisite fee were charged subsequently by the university administration?
3-Whether the fee taken by staffs of aforementioned university from Kuldeep Kumar Chaudhary belonging to weaker and downtrodden section was not illegal ipso facto obvious from the circumstances that Kuldeep Kumar Chaudhary was not apprised of the facts that a student can’t opt two subjects but from cryptic dealings of the staffs of aforementioned university is quite obvious that entire episode was under their cunning scrutiny and part of their well-planned strategies. 
4-If the two subjects of History are not allowed for private students, then how the admit card can be issued in two subjects of History as done in a cryptic way in the case of Kuldeep Kumar Chaudhary belonging to weaker and downtrodden section and if issued, then obligation of concerned staffs to arrange the facilities in order to conduct the exam.It is unfortunate that more than two dozen representations, couldn’t convince these tyrants to be sympathized with the poor student.
5-Aggrieved student is affirming that no staffs of university ever contacted to him but accountable staffs of aforementioned university falsely misleading the government as part of their practice that they had informed the aggrieved student Kuldeep Kumar Chaudhary. 

This is a humble request of your applicant to you Hon’ble Sir that how can it be justified to withhold public services arbitrarily and promote anarchy, lawlessness, and chaos in an arbitrary manner by making the mockery of law of land? This is need of the hour to take harsh steps against the wrongdoer in order to win the confidence of citizenry and strengthen the democratic values for healthy and prosperous democracy. For this, your applicant shall ever pray you, Hon’ble Sir.                                                          Yours sincerely
                                              Yogi M. P. Singh, Mobile number-7379105911, Mohalla- Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road, District-Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh, Pin code-231001.


2 attachments
Kuldeep Kumar Chaudhary in regard to refund of fee and compensation.pdf
311K
Anarchy in MGKVP University.pdf
1631K
0 0 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
2 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh

4-If the two subjects of History are not allowed for private students, then how the admit card can be issued in two subjects of History as done in a cryptic way in the case of Kuldeep Kumar Chaudhary belonging to weaker and downtrodden section and if issued, then obligation of concerned staffs to arrange the facilities in order to conduct the exam.It is unfortunate that more than two dozen representations, couldn't convince these tyrants to be sympathized with the poor student.
5-Aggrieved student is affirming that no staffs of university ever contacted to him but accountable staffs of aforementioned university falsely misleading the government as part of their practice that they had informed the aggrieved student Kuldeep Kumar Chaudhary.

Arun Pratap Singh
2 years ago

1-After more than two dozen representations and one-year later, they made available information that a private student can't apply for two subjects of History ipso facto obvious from the following image.
2-If aforementioned norms were set up by University, then why the applicant Kuldeep Kumar Chaudhary belonging to weaker and downtrodden section was allowed to submit form who opted for two subjects of History and requisite fee were charged subsequently by the university administration?
3-Whether the fee taken by staffs of aforementioned university from Kuldeep Kumar Chaudhary belonging to weaker and downtrodden section was not illegal ipso facto obvious from the circumstances that Kuldeep Kumar Chaudhary was not apprised of the facts that a student can't opt two subjects but from cryptic dealings of the staffs of aforementioned university is quite obvious that entire episode was under their cunning scrutiny and part of their well-planned strategies.