May 28, 2012 Yogi

1 “REPORTABLE” IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 8865 OF 2010 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 6950 OF 2007) Pitambar Singh & Ors. … Appellants Versus State of Bihar & Ors. … Respondents J U D G M E N T V.S. SIRPURKAR, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. A judgment dismissing the Letters Patent Appeal and confirming the order of the Single Judge has fallen for consideration in this appeal. The learned Single Judge of the High Court had dismissed the Writ Petition. By order dated 31.12.1983 passed by the Sub- Divisional Officer…

May 19, 2012 Yogi

Dear friends. I sought information from B.S.A. Mirzapur under subsection 1 of section 6 of R.T.I. Act 2005 concerned with the midday meal plan of state government. B.S.A. did not entertain that RTI communique. Now your friend filed first appeal before D.M. Mirzapur under subsection 1 of section 19 of R.T.I. Act 2005 and PIO of collectorate as appeal was endorsed to him by D.M. Mirzapur directed B.S.A. Mirzapur to made available sought information to your friend. But unfortunately direction was ignored by B.S.A. Mirzapur. Ultimately your friend filed second appeal under subsection 3 of section 19 of R.T.I. Act…

May 19, 2012 Yogi

Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh to secypg, hgovup, csup, acph-rb, ddpg2-arpg, lokayukta, pmosb, cmup Hon’ble Sir. With due respect your applicant wants draw kind attention of Hon’ble Sir towards following submissions as follows. 1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that B.D.O. Chhanbey sent communication dated 4.7.2011 addressed to C.D.O. Mirzapur letter no.271/sthan./RTI/2011-12 containing photo copy two work completion certificate as enclosures. Copies of aforesaid letter and concerned annexures were served to your applicant in order to comply the direction of PMO regarding your applicant’s letter dated 20.2.2011 addressed to Hon’ble Prime Minister of India. 2-It is submitted…

May 19, 2012 Yogi

Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh 7/12/11 to hgovup Hon’ble Sir. This is humble request of your applicant to take a reference of submissions dated02.11.2010 submitted before A.C.J.M. first Mirzapur by your applicant Yogi M.P.Singh as follows and issue appropriate direction in the interest of justice. IN THE COURT OF ADDITIONAL CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE(FIRST)AT DISTRICT COURT DIST-MIRZAPUR(U.P.) CRIMINAL APPAL NO. 2315/07. Complainant is Santosh Dhar Dubey S/O Sri Shiva Nath Dubey Vill+P.O.-Nibi Gaharwar Block-Chhanbey Dist-Mirzapur(U.P.) Versus Yogi M.P. Singh S/O Sri Rajendra Pratap Singh Vill+Post-Nibi Gaharwar Block-Chhanbey Dist-Mirzapur(U.P.) is respondent PRAYER; D.P.R.O. Mirzapur to be summoned in person to…

May 19, 2012 Yogi 1Comment

Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh 7/22/11 to hgovup Hon’ble Sir. I sought following point wise informations under subsection 1 of section 6 of R.T.I. Act 2005. 1- Hon’ble Sir may direct P.I.O. to made available access to information that howmuch time is given to any authority to comply the order of hon’ble court as there has been more than one year since the date 12.6.2008 on which day court issued order to summon original copy of enquiry report and letter of nomination of enquiry officer. 2-To direct P.I.O. to made available access to information whether a bureaucrat can…

May 19, 2012 Yogi 1Comment

Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh 7/30/11 to sec.sic Hon’ble Sir. With due respect your applicnt wants to draw kind attention Hon’ble Sir towards following submissions as follows. 1-D.P.R.O. Mirzapur can only reject an R.T.I. Application under subsection 1 of section 7 & subsection 8 of section 7 R.T.I. Act 2005. Which was not followed by him. 2-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that D.P.R.O. Mirzapur can reject an R.T.I. Application only for any of reasons specified in sections 8 & 9 of R.T.I. Act 2005. Which was not follwed by D.P.R.O. Mirzapur. 3- It is submitted before…

May 19, 2012 Yogi 2Comment

Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh 8/21/11 to hgovup Hon’ble Sir. With due respect your applicant wants to draw kind attention of you Hon’ble Sir towards following submissions as follows. 1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that your applicant submitted an application dated 14.12.2008 to Hon’ble Prime Minister of India as follows. To Hon’ble Prime Minister of India, Dr. Man Mohan Singh, New Delhi Subject- Hon’ble Sir is kindly requested to take a glance of this application and pass an appropriate order as you Hon’ble Sir deem fit. Most Hon’ble Sir. Most rerpectfully I want to draw kind…

May 19, 2012 Yogi 1Comment

Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh 9/1/11 to secypg Hon’ble Sir. With due respect your applicant wants to draw kind attention of Hon’ble Sir towards submissions of aforesaid letter in which your applicant requested to direct Government of Uttar Pradesh to establish rule of law in its administrative function and no one may be allowed to take law under teeth. 1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that B. D. O. Chhanbey Dist-Mirzapur informed your applicant through its letter no. 948/estclerk /R.T.I./2008-09 dated 7.2.2009 that in the gram panchayat-Nibi Gaharwar under N.R.E.G.A. Rs4700.00(four thousand seven hundred only)has been spent…

May 19, 2012 Yogi 1Comment

Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh 10/27/11 to sec.sic Hon’ble Sir. With due respect your applicant wants to draw kind attention of Hon’ble Sir towards points of aforesaid letter which was made available in order to respond appeal under subsection 1 of section 19 of R.T.I. Act 2005 dated 3.7.2011 filed before commissioner vindhyachal division Mirzapur(U.P.) as follows. 1-In this question no photo copy of any letter has been sought so it is not in accordance with the R.T.I. Act 2005. 2Hon’ble Sir. With due respect your applicant wants to draw kind attention of Hon’ble Sir towards points of…

May 19, 2012 Yogi 1Comment

Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M. P. Singh 9/23/11 to s.mishra An appeal under subsection 3 of section 19 of R.T.I. Act 2005. To Hon’ble Chief Information Commissioner/Companion Commissioners, Government of India, New Delhi Subject- Judgement order passed by first appellate authority of Supreme Court of india delivered on 18.7.2011 in appeal No. 222 of 2011 is arbitrary, against the spirit of R.T.I. Act. 2005. Hon’ble Sir. With due respect Your appellant wants to draw the kind attention of Hon’ble Sir towards following submissions as follows. 1- It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that First Appellate authority quoted in its…